Author
|
Topic: Ed Haas and the 'conversation in Hebrew' (Read 2506 times)
|
DonnieDarko
Taking a sabbatical
Major General

Offline
Zodiac: 
Posts: 1308
|
 |
Re: Ed Haas and the 'conversation in Hebrew'
on: February 01, 2007, 06:44:36 PM »
Post #59150 Reply to: Proemio, at Post 59140
|
|
That would explain 50,000 word meltdowns instead of a simple explanation - respect for soccer talent... I've never seen anything like it. 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
| |
JamesPaul66
Private First Class
 
Offline
Zodiac: 
Posts: 44
|
 |
Re: Ed Haas and the 'conversation in Hebrew' (in your dreams...)
on: February 02, 2007, 02:03:43 AM »
Post #59214 Reply to: Proemio, at Post 59140
|
|
Soccer involves a lot of getting bumped on the head. That would explain 50,000 word meltdowns instead of a simple explanation - respect for soccer talent... What do you think?  Shit, was that a meltdown? That was some of the most brilliant posts I've ever read. Well, bring on the meltdowns! Planet Quo, stick around. And just ignore whoever you think's a troll.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
| |
JamesPaul66
Private First Class
 
Offline
Zodiac: 
Posts: 44
|
 |
Re: Ed Haas and the 'conversation in Hebrew'
on: February 02, 2007, 02:39:00 AM »
Post #59217 Reply to: DonnieDarko, at Post 59020
|
|
No way! This guy is ABSOLOUTLY hilarious and insane.
PQ is way too coherent to be insane. Length of posts does not automatically signify illogic. Except in debus' case and some others. The most entertaining thread this side of Zion.  Entertaining, absolutely! Who's complaining about lengthy posts? Nobody's forcing you to be here. And there's this thing on your mouse...oh, nevermind.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
| |
Proemio
General
Online
Zodiac: 
Posts: 2570
|
 |
Re: Ed Haas and the 'conversation in Hebrew' (in your dreams...)
on: February 02, 2007, 08:03:10 AM »
Post #59227 Reply to: JamesPaul66, at Post 59214
|
|
Shit, was that a meltdown? That was some of the most brilliant posts I've ever read. Well, bring on the meltdowns! Will you settle for mad genius? I don't know, but if someone would question how I possibly could "highly respect" some controversial figure(s), I would clarify that it is because of the figures' impeccable taste in cuffflinks and nothing else, instead of writing a 'thesis' about the questioner, combined with lengthy point-by-point disapprovals of apparently everything that "highly respected" person(s) stands for. It may be brilliant in style, but not terribly convincing in purpose; unless of course, I missed the purpose. Entertaining? - You bet. Nobody is going to stop it...
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
| |
PlanetQuo
Sergeant
Offline
Zodiac: 
Posts: 116
WWW
|
 |
Re: Ed Haas and the 'conversation in Hebrew'
on: February 02, 2007, 12:17:02 PM »
Post #59244 Reply to: DonnieDarko, at Post 58548
|
|
On 13th December, 2006, PlanetQuo said:I promote Daryl Bradford Smith, Eric Hufschmid and Christopher Bollyn simply on the basis of the quality of the work that they produce, and my website promotes other members of the alternative media besides them. I also have a great deal of respect for Michael Rivero, Dr. Stanley Monteith, Texe Marrs and David Icke. I do not, however, respect or trust Alex Jones nor am I entirely convinced that Ed Haas is the genuine article. On 26th January, 2007, Donnie Dingo said:You reckon David Icke's a man to be respected a great deal? On 1st February, 2007, Donnie Dungo said:It appears i WAS wrong! You actually said "great deal of respect" rather than "respect" when referring to one of the BIGGEST disinfo men out their "David Icke". On 22nd September, 2006, Donnie Lizardo said:I am immensely proud to have finally cracked it both intellectually and emotionally. My heart has linked with my head and I now know EXACTLY who and what I am dealing with. They may well indeed be shape shifting lizards as it is hard to believe they are human. On 27th January, 2006, Donnie Dumbo said:Firstly, he is compromised. He is an establishment man. A media savvy man and ripe for the picking as a "controlled opposition agent". I have no doubt there are compromising piccies of him somewhere on someones computer. Simply watch him speak...his body language. He KNOWS he's lying when he gets to the "Lizards". He KNOWS it. He is totally aware it's a fraud On 1st February, 2007, sbalger said:I would like to point out that it is my humble assumption that planet quo respects david icke because he used to play soccer. You may well be correct there sbalger. He showed great courage in continuing to play the beautiful game despite the onset of arthritis cutting short a promising career. Respect. (  ...I said THAT word again) Then again, your assumption may be wrong. I may respect Icke a great deal because he did such a first-class job when he was the BBC's anchorman for the snooker.  To borrow Donnie Divvo's words:: But you will never know...  On 1st February, 2007, Proemio said:Soccer involves a lot of getting bumped on the head.... So too does entering the ring to try and rescue comrades who have backed themselves into a corner. Consider yourself to have been bumped directly on the head.  If you were to devote as much time to reading what I actually wrote as you do to counting how many words I wrote, you might actually have something constructive to say. But since you prefer to count my words rather than read them, all that can be expected from you is smartass one-liners. On 1st February, 2007, Donnie Shillo said:Still. You can change sides half way through later. Proemio can't though. We know with which side his loyalties lie. Indeed, Proemio first entered the fray A WEEK AGO by asking a question in respect of (  ...I said THAT word again) the timing of the post I made last Friday regarding Debus. Proemio's question was: Doesn't it strike you as somewhat odd, to have this huge effort some 10 day after a 9 posts/day poster has already been sent on 'unpaid leave'.... I have a question too. It is "somewhat odd", is it not, that Proemio - like Donnie Darko - joins the thread SEVEN WEEKS after I had initiated this discussion, and on the tail-end of Donnie Darko's blistering attack on me, he - like Donnie Darko - immediately - like Donnie Darko - begins to sow seeds of doubt regarding my post on Debus? Five and-a-half hours later, Proemio returns to reveal that he is: ....still not into 911 research. I have another question: If Proemio, as he has already unambiguously, categorically, and specifically stated without reservation; "not into 911 research", then, precisely why, I enquire, has he joined this thread? Since this thread is directly rated to 9-11 research, there can be no shadow of doubt whatsoever, that his presence here - like Donnie Darko's - is not with regard to participating in or contributing to the discussion on Ed Haas and the conversation in Hebrew. And since neither indicates even the slightest interest in discussing Ed Haas and the conversation in Hebrew, it is then simple logic decrees that both have joined this thread for other reasons. As I have asked numerous times already during the course of this thread, how much more obvious can it be?  On 9th January, 2007, Donnie Dunceo said:I am new to the machinations of jewdom. I always considered them bit players till the last 2 years because they tend to change there names...  Yet he stated just over FOUR MONTHS AGO that: After 2 years of long and bitter struggle I have finally arrived. Since Mr. Fibbo is evidently confused about precisely when his great awakening and subsequent enlightenment occurred, he needs to clarify exactly when he "finally arrived" at his discovery of a "Jewish plot" which has been formulated by a "Judaic death cult", who, he tells us, he finds "hard" to believe are human and "may well indeed be shape shifting Lizards."  Donnie Liaro needs to explain why, when he speaks of shape-shifting Lizards, who he contends may actually be members of a "Judaic death cult"; he believes that he feels that he can present himself as a staunch critic of David Icke - the man who is Donnie Lizardo says is " compromised" - a " controlled opposition agent", who knows he is lying when he gets to the shape shifting lizards - the man who is "totally aware" it's a fraud - a con man - a man so " blatantly full of it" - an " OBVIOUS" " disinfo artist" - one of the "BIGGEST" disinfo men" - the "WORST disinfo agent around" - an " EASILY identifiable DISINFO agent" - a man who 'I' have 'lobbed' "into the mix" - one of my "associates", to whom I "attest" my "love." A man who is " ABSOLOUTLY (sic)" emphatic when he says that when he means Lizards he means Lizards yet is emphatically challenged in his beliefs by Donnie Disinfo, who would have us believe that Icke's shape-shifting Lizards may be clandenstine members of a "Judaic death cult." Donnie Dorko also needs to explain how his awakening and ensuing enlightenment, whenever it may have taken place - and I'm not 100% certain that it actually has - was brought-about by a book which was written by a clinical psychologist and addresses the subject of pedophiles, rapists, and other sex offenders, and from which Donnie Dungo stumbled upon a "Jewish plot" that nobody else who read the book managed to discover. And Donnie Trollo finally needs to explain why he is posting here with such regularity on a thread titled Ed Haas and the conversation in Hebrew when he has absolutely nothing to say on that particular issue. On 1st February, 2007, Donnie Diablo said:I've never seen anything like it. I offer Mr. Darkhorse my deepest gratitude in respect of (  ...I said THAT word again) his accolade.  On 1st February, 2007, JamesPaul66 said:That was some of the most brilliant posts I've ever read. Thank you kindly my good man. It's nice to be appreciated. Can I buy you a drink?  PQ is way too coherent to be insane. I think I do okay for someone Donnie Drunko proclaims to be a retarded, moronic, "COMPLETELY" insane, alcoholic. Who's complaining about lengthy posts? Donnie Whingeo and Protestmio are. And I in turn am complaining most vociferously about neither of them being the slightest bit interested in discussing Ed Haas and the conversation in Hebrew. Planet Quo, stick around You bet! Contrary to his delusion, "the Master" has not 'sent me packing', "running for the door" so that I can return to "the valley of the peasants."
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: February 02, 2007, 01:00:26 PM by PlanetQuo »
|
Logged
|
"Warning: Smith is convinced NOLAJBS.net is another Zionist group"
Daryl Bradford Smith
|
|
| |
PlanetQuo
Sergeant
Offline
Zodiac: 
Posts: 116
WWW
|
 |
Re: Ed Haas and the 'conversation in Hebrew'
on: February 02, 2007, 12:40:59 PM »
Post #59246 Reply to: Proemio, at Post 59227
|
|
I don't know, but if someone would question how I possibly could "highly respect" some controversial figure(s), I would clarify that it is because of the figures' impeccable taste in cuffflinks and nothing else, instead of writing a 'thesis' about the questioner, combined with lengthy point-by-point disapprovals of apparently everything that "highly respected" person(s) stands for. It may be brilliant in style, but not terribly convincing in purpose; unless of course, I missed the purpose. You did indeed miss the point Mr. Pro-Darko. And the point is: this thread is about Ed Haas and the conversation in Hebrew not David Icke's apparent "impeccable taste in cuffflinks." And how do you know so much about the man-in-question's taste in cufflinks? 'Cufflinks', by the way, is spelt with two 'f's. I see that you too have the same irritating and deceitful habit of quoting people as having said things that they did not say. I have never stated here or anywhere else that the man of whose work and dress sense you and your side-kick evidently know so much about is "highly respected." Do not try this again. Your deception will not go unnoticed. Thank you for your kind remarks in saying that my trilogy of posts that you mislabel as a 'thesis' are "brilliant in style." I won't be buying you a drink though. The purpose of my trilogy was not to convince you of anything. We already know exactly where you stand. The purpose of my posts were to convince the many people who I know to be observering this thread that this forum, as Daryl Bradford Smith said two months ago, has been infiltrated by Zionist deceivers. And to that end, I have succeeded. Perhaps you should consider writing a thesis to convince them that this "mad genius" got it all wrong. Entertaining? - You bet. Nobody is going to stop it... It is you, my dear chap, who is providing the entertainment - it is you who is providing an unintended source of great amusement to many people, Prollie.  ...and you can't blame Donnie Laurelo for getting you into yet another fine mess. Maybe you just grab a parachute and bail-out.
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: February 02, 2007, 01:02:27 PM by PlanetQuo »
|
Logged
|
"Warning: Smith is convinced NOLAJBS.net is another Zionist group"
Daryl Bradford Smith
|
|
| |
NewMath
Lieutenant Colonel
   
Offline
Zodiac: 
Posts: 970
|
 |
Re: Ed Haas and the 'conversation in Hebrew'
on: February 02, 2007, 02:39:08 PM »
Post #59259 Reply to: PlanetQuo, at Post 59246
|
|
Donnie Dimbo Donnie Dildo Divvie Dorko Dorkie Dicko Donkey Dippo Doggie Barko Donner Kebabo Dunnie Dumpo Tinnie Drunko Diggie Dingo Donnie Lizardo Donnie Turdo Donnie Ickeo Donnie Divvo Donnie Shillo Donnie Disinfo Donnie Trollo Donnie Drunko Donnie Whingeo Donnie Laurelo
i think your crush on donnie is kinda cute 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
| |
Proemio
General
Online
Zodiac: 
Posts: 2570
|
 |
Re: Ed Haas and the 'conversation in Hebrew'
on: February 02, 2007, 03:00:59 PM »
Post #59261 Reply to: PlanetQuo, at Post 59246
|
|
You did indeed miss the point Mr. Pro-Darko. Wow - another "you are either with us or against us" special - thank G-d... . Of course And the point is: this thread is about Ed Haas and the conversation in Hebrew not David Icke's apparent "impeccable taste in cuffflinks." And how do you know so much about the man-in-question's taste in cufflinks? 'Cufflinks', by the way, is spelt with two 'f's. After a database full off rants about this poster or that, all we know is that you agree with essentially nothing the man represents, but "highly respect" him all the same. Since only you know why, cufflinks was as good an object as any to illustrate the 'seriousness' of the situation. Perhaps "dick" would have made the point more obvious to you. As to the spell-oups; you can find many more significant failings in the 'punctuation field' - how well do you write in your third language? I see that you too have the same irritating and deceitful habit of quoting people as having said things that they did not say. I have never stated here or anywhere else that the man of whose work and dress sense you and your side-kick evidently know so much about is "highly respected." Do not try this again. Your deception will not go unnoticed. I'm banking on it not to go unnoticed... The block of text immediately above is a called a quote. The block of text you are referring to as a deception is called a parody, since it clearly states "If I... ("I" would be me). I don't know, but if someone would question how I possibly could "highly respect" some controversial figure(s), I would clarify that it is because of the figures' impeccable taste in cuffflinks and nothing else, instead of writing a 'thesis' about the questioner, combined with lengthy point-by-point disapprovals of apparently everything that "highly respected" person(s) stands for. It may be brilliant in style, but not terribly convincing in purpose; unless of course, I missed the purpose. Initially a parody of the situation, but now, you can count it as a parody of yourself; whatever inspires you more. The purpose of my trilogy was not to convince you of anything. We already know exactly where you stand. Son-of-a-gun, what rare wisdom - who'da thunk. Who's we! I asked your word-starved buddy (debus) the same thing - he never answered - imagine... The purpose of my posts were to convince the many people who I know to be observering this thread that this forum, as Daryl Bradford Smith said two months ago, has been infiltrated by Zionist deceivers. And to that end, I have succeeded. Gee, I didn't know that. Here I thought our little knitting-circle was immune from the rabbis' little helpers. Of course DBS is/was right. Note, that he pointed it out to the unaware looking at his site, not to the members already here - take an educated, perfectly spelled guess as to why. One day, maybe it will work, but so far Mystica tried, Debus tried, many others as well. They are on leave, and I'm still here, as thoroughly exposed and discredited as ever. What makes you guys think even longer pretzels will succeed? Maybe you just grab a parachute and bail-out. Evidently, that "parachute diversion" crashing has the lot of you pissed...
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
| |
JamesPaul66
Private First Class
 
Offline
Zodiac: 
Posts: 44
|
 |
Re: Ed Haas and the 'conversation in Hebrew'
on: February 03, 2007, 03:05:23 AM »
Post #59316 Reply to: PlanetQuo, at Post 59244
|
|
Can I buy you a drink?  Sure, but I have to warn you, when I drink, I start talking about "jewish conspiracies."
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
| |
DonnieDarko
Taking a sabbatical
Major General

Offline
Zodiac: 
Posts: 1308
|
 |
Re: Ed Haas and the 'conversation in Hebrew'
on: February 03, 2007, 05:36:09 AM »
Post #59319 Reply to: NewMath, at Post 59259
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
| |
DonnieDarko
Taking a sabbatical
Major General

Offline
Zodiac: 
Posts: 1308
|
 |
Re: Ed Haas and the 'conversation in Hebrew'
on: February 03, 2007, 05:41:27 AM »
Post #59320 Reply to: PlanetQuo, at Post 59244
|
|
On 1st February, 2007, JamesPaul66 said:That was some of the most brilliant posts I've ever read. PLANET QUEER said:Thank you kindly my good man. It's nice to be appreciated. Can I buy you a drink? You two be careful. Wear two condoms. Plenty of lube and start slow.  This is what a homo said to me after he came out of his anesthetic after having his anus dilated to remove the dildo and light globe.  True story. 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
| |
DonnieDarko
Taking a sabbatical
Major General

Offline
Zodiac: 
Posts: 1308
|
 |
Re: Ed Haas and the 'conversation in Hebrew'
on: February 03, 2007, 05:48:33 AM »
Post #59321 Reply to: Proemio, at Post 59227
|
|
Will you settle for mad genius? Maybe it's Dr Who? The TARDIS is in for repairs and he's moonlighting on the forums? I don't know, but if someone would question how I possibly could "highly respect" some controversial figure(s), I would clarify that it is because of the figures' impeccable taste in cuffflinks and nothing else, instead of writing a 'thesis' about the questioner, combined with lengthy point-by-point disapprovals of apparently everything that "highly respected" person(s) stands for. It may be brilliant in style, but not terribly convincing in purpose; unless of course, I missed the purpose. It's a fairly simple question.  Entertaining? - You bet. Nobody is going to stop it... Yeh...but sometimes it's like laughing at someone who just slipped on a banana peel. :-)
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
| |
DonnieDarko
Taking a sabbatical
Major General

Offline
Zodiac: 
Posts: 1308
|
 |
Re: Ed Haas and the 'conversation in Hebrew'
on: February 03, 2007, 05:52:17 AM »
Post #59322 Reply to: PlanetQuo, at Post 59244
|
|
On 1st February, 2007, Donnie Shillo said:Still. You can change sides half way through later. P.Q Wrote:Proemio can't though. We know with which side his loyalties lie.
Hey PROEMIO! Which Rabbi you workin with? Should we push for higher wages? Hell...i just did two 12 hour shifts... removal company  . Cant dem Rabbi's pay better? Damn jews!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
| |
DonnieDarko
Taking a sabbatical
Major General

Offline
Zodiac: 
Posts: 1308
|
 |
Re: Ed Haas and the 'conversation in Hebrew'
on: February 03, 2007, 05:58:41 AM »
Post #59323 Reply to: PlanetQuo, at Post 59246
|
|
The purpose of my trilogy was not to convince you of anything. We already know exactly where you stand. The purpose of my posts were to convince the many people who I know to be observering this thread that this forum, as Daryl Bradford Smith said two months ago, has been infiltrated by Zionist deceivers. And to that end, I have succeeded. Perhaps you should consider writing a thesis to convince them that this "mad genius" got it all wrong. Do you find it ironic that the man who DBS laughs loudest at, as OBVIOUS disinfo is Icke? Also Makow? And do you know that Makow and Icke have teamed up? So, with that in mind...you must surely be able to see the incredible irony in your choice of giving a... "great deal of respect"? Please tell me you see the irony? Pretty please? Here, i'll ask again...I do not promote Icke's theories about shape-shifting, blood-drinking Reptilians from the fourth dimension. I do not believe in aliens or UFOs - I never have. I do not share his interpretation of who the Illuminati may be. I definitely do not concur with his views on the Vatican, and, I can assure you, Doggie Barko, that I most certainly am not in accord with his contention that Zionists are not responsible for the slaughter of almost 3,000 people. Thats %99 of Icke. You're saying you disagree with practically EVERYTHING Icke stands for and THEN you lob into the mix that you "respect" him. The other %1 btw is underground cities. Is this what you agree with?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
| |
Proemio
General
Online
Zodiac: 
Posts: 2570
|
 |
Re: Ed Haas and the 'conversation in Hebrew'
on: February 03, 2007, 07:58:25 AM »
Post #59329 Reply to: PlanetQuo, at Post 59244
|
|
For some obscure reason I missed these 6 cuddly references to me; all in one post, no flag - nothing.  You know them by form, by method, by substance (rather lack of) and by character (rather lack of) - Proemio
Proemio can't though. We know with which side his loyalties lie. Indeed, Proemio first entered the fray A WEEK AGO by asking a question in respect of (  ...I said THAT word again) the timing of the post I made last Friday regarding Debus. Proemio's question was: I have a question too. It is "somewhat odd", is it not, that Proemio - like Donnie Darko - joins the thread SEVEN WEEKS after I had initiated this discussion, and on the tail-end of Donnie Darko's blistering attack on me, he - like Donnie Darko - immediately - like Donnie Darko - begins to sow seeds of doubt regarding my post on Debus? Five and-a-half hours later, Proemio returns to reveal that he is: I have another question: If Proemio, as he has already unambiguously, categorically, and specifically stated without reservation; "not into 911 research", then, precisely why, I enquire, has he joined this thread? Since this thread is directly rated to 9-11 research, there can be no shadow of doubt whatsoever, that his presence here - like Donnie Darko's - is not with regard to participating in or contributing to the discussion on Ed Haas and the conversation in Hebrew. And since neither indicates even the slightest interest in discussing Ed Haas and the conversation in Hebrew, it is then simple logic decrees that both have joined this thread for other reasons. As I have asked numerous times already during the course of this thread, how much more obvious can it be?  Let's see if you are capable of any independent, original and highly demanding thought. I have stated again and again, that I am not interested in the 9/11 demolition discussions. That I consider such discussions (demolition in particular) a waste of time at best, a deliberate diversion at worst. I have also stated - just as often - that I am very, very interested in giving pretzel makers an acute case of indigestion, no matter what, no matter where. Now if you rub that independent brain cell of yours together - try in the manner of one-hand-clapping - you will perhaps, maybe, eventually be capable of discerning through that fog, WHY I commented on this thread, WHEN and about WHAT I did comment. Let me give you a subtle hint: I joined this thread the moment you used the already noted absence of your fellow pretzel maker, to buy yourself some credibility by trashing that already trashed trash. It evidently almost worked - almost... Does that answer your 'cunningly', in smear disguised inquiry?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
| |
|
|