 Author
|
Topic: Ed Haas and the 'conversation in Hebrew' (Read 2506 times)
|
|
InfensusMentis
Guest
|
 |
Re: Ed Haas and the 'conversation in Hebrew'
on: February 03, 2007, 11:21:49 AM »
Post #59346 Reply to: Proemio, at Post 59329
|
|
PlanetQuo. What can I say.. That was one of the most satisfying, masterful, eloquent, entertaining deconstructions of a person that I've ever seen. True to your word, you made Donnie Dipshit pay. Bravo, my good man, Bravo. And all Proemio and Rodin can do is whinge that the posts are too long? What the fuck? I find that disappointing. And that's not all we're getting from Poofmio, either; he seems to be more than willing to align himself with Donnie Disinfo, which to me, speaks volumes about his purpose here.
Donnie, Donnie, Donnie. How can you show your face here now? How do you do it? You're still clinging desperately to this "you said you respect David Icke, uh-huk, uh-huk" bullshit. Man, he just disgraced you. You have been humiliated, and you don't seem to even be aware of it.
Moreover, the very thing you accuse him of is that which you are more than guilty of yourself. PlanetQuo has just proven to us conclusively that you actually believe the lizard wank that makes "respecting" David Icke such a ridiculous notion to you. What the fuck? Which one is it?
Donnie Zio, I suggest you take whatever little remaining sense of self esteem and worthiness you have left and bow out now, sunshine. You're gone. You lost. Your cover was blown. You're a shill, and a bad, dumb one.
Don't embarrass Australia any more than you already have.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
| |
NewMath
Lieutenant Colonel
Offline
Zodiac: 
Posts: 970
|
|
Re: Ed Haas and the 'conversation in Hebrew'
on: February 03, 2007, 01:10:09 PM »
Post #59355 Reply to: Guest at Post 59346
|
|
infensusmentis. if youre going to log in as a guest and comment, at least change your posting style a little bit. i figured out who you were in about two seconds, and im not even very good at that sort of thing.
and before you and planetquo row off into the sunset, singing 'kum-ba-yah' and sharing a milkshake, you should read the thread again. quo resurrected this dormant thread by posting a magnum opus directed at a six week old post, kinda like daffy duck yelling "aaaand STAY out!" to someone who has already left...then has the nerve to question the motives of others who arrived late to the thread. he mentions david icke, then when questioned about it, demands that others stay on topic, rather than answer the questions, or even stay on topic himself.
planetquo should hold himself to the same standard he sets for others.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
| |
Infensus Mentis
Private
Offline
Zodiac:
Posts: 37
WWW
|
|
Re: Ed Haas and the 'conversation in Hebrew'
on: February 03, 2007, 01:59:54 PM »
Post #59358 Reply to: NewMath, at Post 59355
|
|
I just finished reading the fucking thing, in it's entirety, I'm not reading it again. That'd just be silly. And I don't look at the dates, no. It's more fun to imagine it as an argument happening in real time. I don't give a fuck if you know who I am, in fact it's kinda flattering if you do. I am, after all, a bit of a celebrity over at myspace.  But I don't think you do, because you seem to be implying that I've been here before, and I haven't. So you're right, you're not very good at that kind of thing. What, do you think I'm PlanetQuo logging in as a guest to congratulate himself? "Bravo man, bravo". |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Regardless of what I just said, I'm right and you're wrong.
|
|
| |
Infensus Mentis
Private
Offline
Zodiac:
Posts: 37
WWW
|
|
Re: Ed Haas and the 'conversation in Hebrew'
on: February 03, 2007, 02:05:43 PM »
Post #59359 Reply to: Infensus Mentis, at Post 59358
|
|
Ah, I see what you mean now. One's got a picture and one hasn't, so I logged in as a guest. I forgot I was a member, that's why. I sign up for all sorts of different shit that I never use.
But I think if I was trying to conceal my identity, I might've used a different name, don't you think?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Regardless of what I just said, I'm right and you're wrong.
|
|
| |
DonnieDarko
Taking a sabbatical
Major General
Offline
Zodiac:
Posts: 1308
|
|
Re: Ed Haas and the 'conversation in Hebrew'
on: February 03, 2007, 07:10:50 PM »
Post #59375 Reply to: Guest at Post 59346
|
|
Just For The Record:
With regards my..."sometimes I wonder if they are lizards" comment.
This was in the context of realizing the full depth to the 3000 year old conspiracy to enslave the human race. It seemed simply unbelievable that some one could continue annoying the rest of mankind for so long.
In this context it is clear that I was wondering about the "lizard" mentality of these people. That is..."cold hearts"...etc...[insert metaphor]
I dignify P.Q's half assed post with a reply just in case any 14 year olds log on and get sucked in by P.Q's cunning ruse.
Wait a minute...O.K: I ADMIT IT. I am a "Zionist Shill". P.Q has outted me. Boy am I "embarrassed". There, i've answered your question. Now answer mine in less than 20,000 words and 400 references and footnotes...
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
| |
DonnieDarko
Taking a sabbatical
Major General
Offline
Zodiac:
Posts: 1308
|
|
Re: Ed Haas and the 'conversation in Hebrew'
on: February 03, 2007, 07:16:33 PM »
Post #59376 Reply to: PlanetQuo, at Post 59246
|
|
2 Simple Questions For You Planet Quo:Question 1.You said...The purpose of my trilogy was not to convince you of anything. We already know exactly where you stand. The purpose of my posts were to convince the many people who I know to be observering this thread that this forum, as Daryl Bradford Smith said two months ago, has been infiltrated by Zionist deceivers. And to that end, I have succeeded. Perhaps you should consider writing a thesis to convince them that this "mad genius" got it all wrong. I replied...Do you find it ironic that the man who DBS laughs loudest at, as OBVIOUS disinfo is Icke? Also Makow? And do you know that Makow and Icke have teamed up?
So, with that in mind...you must surely be able to see the incredible irony in your choice of giving a..."great deal of respect"?
Please tell me you see the irony? Can you tell the other forum members how it is you have a..."great deal of respect" for the man DBS laughs loudest at?
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: February 06, 2007, 03:43:03 AM by DonnieDarko »
|
Logged
|
|
|
| |
DonnieDarko
Taking a sabbatical
Major General
Offline
Zodiac:
Posts: 1308
|
|
Re: Ed Haas and the 'conversation in Hebrew'
on: February 03, 2007, 07:24:09 PM »
Post #59377 Reply to: DonnieDarko, at Post 59376
|
|
Question 2.You said...I do not promote Icke's theories about shape-shifting, blood-drinking Reptilians from the fourth dimension. I do not believe in aliens or UFOs - I never have. I do not share his interpretation of who the Illuminati may be. I definitely do not concur with his views on the Vatican, and, I can assure you, Doggie Barko, that I most certainly am not in accord with his contention that Zionists are not responsible for the slaughter of almost 3,000 people. I replied...Thats %99 of Icke. You're saying you disagree with practically EVERYTHING Icke stands for and THEN you lob into the mix that you "respect" him.
The other %1 btw is underground cities. Is this what you agree with? Again. What do you "respect" about this man?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
| |
Fugazi
Private First Class
Offline
Zodiac:
Posts: 41
|
|
Re: Ed Haas and the 'conversation in Hebrew'
on: February 04, 2007, 09:29:40 PM »
Post #59544 Reply to: DonnieDarko, at Post 59377
|
|
Why would Alex Jones promote someone who claims he has evidence of an Israeli connection to 9/11? Hasn't Jones "done the research" and concluded that there is no Israeli connection? Given the amount of evidence already in the public domain to link Israel to the attacks why would anybody entertain Ed Haas and his Israeli source anyway?, unless the whole story is designed to implode at some future date in some attempt to discredit researchers who are a little too much on the ball.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
| |
DonnieDarko
Taking a sabbatical
Major General
Offline
Zodiac:
Posts: 1308
|
|
Re: Ed Haas and the 'conversation in Hebrew'
on: February 04, 2007, 10:00:15 PM »
Post #59554 Reply to: Fugazi, at Post 59544
|
|
Sounds possible. To be honest I dont know much about it. However, now that you mention it and with the fact that PLANET QUO cannot explain his ridiculous love of certain people...maybe thats why PLANET QUO was here bringing it up? In the end who gives a shit. Israeli, British and American Intelligence (various other 'un named' alphabet agencies also) pulled it off. It's all "gravy". We await the next "performance" in Iran. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
| |
Proemio
General
Online
Zodiac:
Posts: 2570
|
|
Re: Ed Haas and the 'conversation in Hebrew'
on: February 04, 2007, 10:31:37 PM »
Post #59559 Reply to: Fugazi, at Post 59544
|
|
Why would Alex Jones promote someone who claims he has evidence of an Israeli connection to 9/11? Hasn't Jones "done the research" and concluded that there is no Israeli connection? Given the amount of evidence already in the public domain to link Israel to the attacks why would anybody entertain Ed Haas and his Israeli source anyway?, unless the whole story is designed to implode at some future date in some attempt to discredit researchers who are a little too much on the ball. Very likely - playing the percentages - and consider this... The story went from Arabs did it -> the Government let it happen -> the Government did it -> Zionist in the Government did it -> 'Israelis' did it. Each step in response to the evolving narrative on the Net. Looks to me, someone is trying desperately to stay in front of that narrative - to lead - except that they are constantly a day late and a shekel short... And for some reason, the very same people also don't seem to appreciate the idea of this. Ever since that was put up, this small place has earned the attention of ever more ' sophisticated, complex beings with no time to waste on the unworthy', but with plenty of time to write ever longer pretzels when people don't swallow the offerings. Fun stuff in tragic times... |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
| |
DonnieDarko
Taking a sabbatical
Major General
Offline
Zodiac:
Posts: 1308
|
|
Re: Ed Haas and the 'conversation in Hebrew'
on: February 04, 2007, 11:23:27 PM »
Post #59571 Reply to: Proemio, at Post 59559
|
|
And for some reason, the very same people also don't seem to appreciate the idea of this. Ever since that was put up, this small place has earned the attention of ever more 'sophisticated, complex beings with no time to waste on the unworthy', but with plenty of time to write ever longer pretzels when people don't swallow the offerings. Yay, indeed the tone was of salt beef sandwiches. He does seem to have gone away. Poor bastard. I was just getting to like his smiley collection. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
| |
JamesPaul66
Private First Class
Offline
Zodiac:
Posts: 44
|
|
Re: Ed Haas and the 'conversation in Hebrew'
on: February 05, 2007, 01:46:45 AM »
Post #59587 Reply to: NewMath, at Post 59355
|
|
and before you and planetquo row off into the sunset, singing 'kum-ba-yah' and sharing a milkshake, you should read the thread again. quo resurrected this dormant thread by posting a magnum opus directed at a six week old post, kinda like daffy duck yelling "aaaand STAY out!" to someone who has already left. And DD didn’t ignore Quo and promptly got his ass kicked too. I would have gladly waited up to 12 weeks for that. ...then has the nerve to question the motives of others who arrived late to the thread. he mentions david icke, then when questioned about it, demands that others stay on topic, rather than answer the questions, or even stay on topic himself. I think your take on it is a little confused. It was DD who said he believed in shape shifting a few weeks before and then goes into someone about Icke. Not to mention DD realized the jewish conspiracy from a child molestation book and was called out already on LF. planetquo should hold himself to the same standard he sets for others.
Yes, we should all hold ourselves to DD's standard. He has so much credibility. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
| |
NewMath
Lieutenant Colonel
Offline
Zodiac:
Posts: 970
|
|
Re: Ed Haas and the 'conversation in Hebrew'
on: February 05, 2007, 01:58:31 AM »
Post #59588 Reply to: JamesPaul66, at Post 59587
|
|
youre wrong.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
| |
DonnieDarko
Taking a sabbatical
Major General
Offline
Zodiac:
Posts: 1308
|
|
Re: Ed Haas and the 'conversation in Hebrew'
on: February 05, 2007, 04:55:37 AM »
Post #59593 Reply to: JamesPaul66, at Post 59587
|
|
And DD didn’t ignore Quo and promptly got his ass kicked too.
I would have gladly waited up to 12 weeks for that.  I think your take on it is a little confused. It was DD who said he believed in shape shifting a few weeks before and then goes into someone about Icke. Not to mention DD realized the jewish conspiracy from a child molestation book and was called out already on LF. I have answered what I thought to be PLAINLY obvious and a "off the cuff one liner" about "lizards" in a previous post at the top of this page. As in ... "maybe they are lizards because they are such cold hearted bastards".If you cant see what is plainly going on - on this thread, then your own credibility is threatened. You will not last long here. P.Q made clear what a kick ass "Zionist Disinfo Spotter" he was. He then went on to state he " greatly respected" 2 of the worst. You can grasp why that is important to bring up dont you? Or are you one of his sock puppets? To say P.Q "kicked my ass" when he has plainly made a fool of himself is either a commentary on your inability to read and comprehend or else you are swapping long kisses in the rain with him. All are outed in the end. Tread carefully. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
| |
DonnieDarko
Taking a sabbatical
Major General
Offline
Zodiac:
Posts: 1308
|
|
Re: Ed Haas and the 'conversation in Hebrew'
on: February 05, 2007, 05:00:15 AM »
Post #59594 Reply to: JamesPaul66, at Post 59587
|
|
I would have gladly waited up to 12 weeks for that. Obviously we've met before? Have I humiliated you on L.F or something? I am beginning to find you quite repulsive. Be a man and get it off your chest. Looking at what you have wrote in defense of a lunatic has said volumes of your intentions here. The "eyes" are watching. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
| |
|
|
