 Author
|
Topic: Ed Haas and the 'conversation in Hebrew' (Read 2506 times)
|
DonnieDarko
Taking a sabbatical
Major General
Offline
Zodiac: 
Posts: 1308
|
 |
Re: Ed Haas and the 'conversation in Hebrew'
on: February 06, 2007, 06:44:03 AM »
Post #59734 Reply to: Fugazi, at Post 59732
|
|
"a bit of "porn"" is not the issue here. It's "a bit of "porn"" that I didn't order and neither has the unsuspecting person who chooses to read my blog as it has no place within my blog. Some people may argue that I should simply remove it and to that I say I choose not to. What the hell are you talking about? There is no "porn" in your web site? The screen shots simply show the "anonamous" logo that comes when using it. Are you worried about the pics I have put up? I will pull them down immediately if thats what you mean? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
| |
DonnieDarko
Taking a sabbatical
Major General
Offline
Zodiac:
Posts: 1308
|
|
Re: Ed Haas and the 'conversation in Hebrew'
on: February 06, 2007, 06:48:34 AM »
Post #59735 Reply to: Fugazi, at Post 59732
|
|
There is some irony however in some of the advertising in the bottom right half of your screen.   I will have a good read after dinner. Will get back.  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
| |
Proemio
General
Online
Zodiac:
Posts: 2570
|
|
Re: Ed Haas and the 'conversation in Hebrew'
on: February 06, 2007, 08:34:09 AM »
Post #59739 Reply to: Guest at Post 59700
|
|
... but I'm not much of a 'joiner'. Besides, I'm not a fan of dictatorships...even so-called 'benevolent' ones...  If you are referring to me, I have you know that I'm just a 'smurf with an attitude'. The antithesis of "follow me"...It's obvious that anyone trying to promote me as their 'dear leader' would be summarily shot...
Suit yourself. Being on-line just makes easier to follow the conversation; to not miss stuff. I wasn't aware that joining meant "joining"...  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
| |
|
rHastaPh3d
Guest
|
|
Re: Ed Haas and the \'conversation in Hebrew\'
on: February 06, 2007, 09:03:10 AM »
Post #59741 Reply to: Guest at Post 59700
|
|
Thanks for the compliment and the kind-of invite, but I\'m not much of a \'joiner\'. Besides, I\'m not a fan of dictatorships...even so-called \'benevolent\' ones... yo stfu dominiqizzle - how you really feel? show us thiznat benevizzles spirit once again mah nizzle!   |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
| |
Proemio
General
Online
Zodiac:
Posts: 2570
|
|
Re: Ed Haas and the 'conversation in Hebrew'
on: February 06, 2007, 09:05:02 AM »
Post #59742 Reply to: Fugazi, at Post 59699
|
|
Now I resent your "tone" to my simple enquire which is, what is going on here? I have not only been insulted, and lucky for you there were no children present, but have also been branded a liar. Lets look at your initial comment: Evidently someone at "anonymouse" or running this forum doesn't think it "Looks good". Thats why they have just been busted for linking the blog link I posted to Porn Spam. Well, did'nt take long to work this set-up out. This is how they tried to set Daryl Bradford Smith up as well. Simple inquiry? Seems you had 'a message' to give, no? Next (after my reaction: "The inference doesn't add up to months (a year?) of precedences - 0 occurrences AFAIK.": Very strange don't you think? Why would this forum use anonymouse? Maybe you could give us some clues Proemio since your the one who codes the site. Now ( after a link to The Answer) you insist on putting me center stage: In the meantime I would appreciate some answers as you are the person who codes the site. This is potentialy damaging to anyone who posts links on this forum ... In two experiments I got no porn - ain't that strange... If you indeed got porn, I apologize for accusing you of lying on that account. Anonymouse may be a problem, as you say; so I encourage you to discuss it with the owner, as I suggested previously by linking to the controlling authority. There is a simple work-around as explained earlier. A little effort can help protect this site and any feelings... |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
| |
|
Turan
Guest
|
|
Re: Ed Haas and the 'conversation in Hebrew'
on: February 06, 2007, 11:25:48 AM »
Post #59746 Reply to: Proemio, at Post 59739
|
|
If you are referring to me
Not at all. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
| |
|
NOLAJBS
|
|
Re: Ed Haas and the 'conversation in Hebrew'
on: February 06, 2007, 12:59:45 PM »
Post #59753 Reply to: PlanetQuo, at Post 53759
|
|
This entire thread has lost it's course.
Moderate it (do your job) - censorship and anti-Free-Speech to some, even a 'benevolent' dictorship.
Unmoderated and you get this - a whole lot of gnashing of teeth.
So, what is the solution?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
| |
|
Turan
Guest
|
|
Re: Ed Haas and the 'conversation in Hebrew'
on: February 06, 2007, 01:09:57 PM »
Post #59754 Reply to: DonnieDarko, at Post 59727
|
|
Hooly Dooly! I just looked at the "latest posts" and you have 13! in a row on the same thread. 13! That HAS to be a record! And your posts are not simple one liners either. Lotsa smileys and extravagant language. Well, I think it's official: PlanetQuo is nuts. Intelligent, to a degree, but nuts. Shill? Maybe, maybe not, IMO he's certainly an 'unintentional' foil, regardless. The rabbis smileth upon him I am sure. This thread is like a 20-car accident on the other side of the freeway, I just. can't. look. away. Psych students and scholars should be alerted to point their browsers to this thread. Some way-out and hilarious stuff here. Not that I've had time to read even 1/10 of it - too boring and not my profession. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
| |
|
Turan
Guest
|
|
Re: Ed Haas and the 'conversation in Hebrew'
on: February 06, 2007, 01:15:57 PM »
Post #59756 Reply to: NOLAJBS, at Post 59753
|
|
Moderate it (do your job) - censorship and anti-Free-Speech to some, even a 'benevolent' dictorship.
You compliment yourself in so saying, LOL. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
| |
|
NOLAJBS
|
|
Re: Ed Haas and the 'conversation in Hebrew'
on: February 06, 2007, 02:24:50 PM »
Post #59762 Reply to: Guest at Post 59756
|
|
Cheers Turan (have another),
That's the trouble with these pesky message boards ... "darned if you do, darned if you don't". Someone always, happens each and every time, throws him(her)self into the machinery and spills tons of bloody chaff in to the fields. What a mess! We could very easily (s)elect a few Moderators from our pool of loyal members, but that might tempt some (no, seriously) to go on a shooting spree and pick off some questionable and shadowy suspects, which will drive away Leaderless Resistance recruits and we may eventually find ourselves with an entire forum comprised of Schizophrenic userHandles. Can't have that.
Your cross between Larry Wall and Guido van Rossum,
NOLAJBS
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
| |
Proemio
General
Online
Zodiac:
Posts: 2570
|
|
Re: Ed Haas and the 'conversation in Hebrew'
on: February 06, 2007, 03:29:27 PM »
Post #59765 Reply to: Guest at Post 59754
|
|
This thread is like a 20-car accident on the other side of the freeway, I just. can't. look. away. What if I could make a case that the thread never really deviated from the topic? Psych students and scholars should be alerted to point their browsers to this thread. Some way-out and hilarious stuff here. Not that I've had time to read even 1/10 of it - too boring and not my profession. Would you still feel so "Comfortably Numb"? ©1980, Pink Floyd
The thread subject says "Ed Haas and the 'conversation in Hebrew'" (X). The question up for discussion is: How can we determine anything about X, when all we can do is evaluate the credibility of the source or sources involved, possible motives and how all this fits into the current time frame. Until post 26, that discussion revolved around the credibility of entities "out there", and ever since, they revolve around the same issues defining entities "in here" - good old credibility. Every single post/opinion is weighed against that credibility - or should be. Neither those "out there" nor those "in here" can escape it or should get a free pass, especially since we can't possibly know for sure "who is who" (and what). Someone from "out there" may in fact be "in here" and vice versa. How you determine all that is up for discussion - perfectly within thread context. My contribution (often with examples) to determine this fundamental part to every discussion: Weigh the combined effect of "Form, Method, Substance, Behavior" - or character for short. Else we are stuck - like the suck-puppets in the galleries - to evaluate a message by who screams loudest, who uses more appropriate smileys, who can afford faster CPUs - all stuff of zero consequence "when brain meets thought". Messenger over message - the great curse... Something like learning, getting informed is what most are here for, or at least pretend to be. How can anyone do that, when they risk to be constantly lead around by the nose, just as in the controlled media, where most recognize the trap, but for some reason think it stops after turning off the tube. It is in my view the most important topic; for otherwise it becomes simply the old bovine question of which wannabe 'dear leader' to mindlessly follow... the antithesis of free men - worse than slaves, because the condition is voluntary, akin to Noahites... |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
| |
carcdr
Gunnery Sergeant
Offline
Zodiac:
Posts: 147
|
|
Re: Ed Haas and the 'conversation in Hebrew'
on: February 06, 2007, 05:02:21 PM »
Post #59767 Reply to: Fugazi, at Post 59732
|
|
The first time I followed a link from this forum - automatically via anonymouse - I got the porn advertisement. I quickly determined that this was due to anonymouse, it was an advertisement pop-up window from anonymouse, along with a small banner on the side that says something to the effect of "if you want to use anonymouse without pop-up advertisements, follow this link". I didn't follow the link on the presumption that it is like many other software products that give you a free version of the product with advertisement pop-ups, or give you the option to lance the ads by buying ($'s) the "pro" version of the product.
The ads on anonymouse have to be "pop-ups" (or "overlays") because they cannot modify the target website to "insert" their advertisements.
Since the first time I used anonymouse, I have received different advertisements (non-porn) and I'm not sure that the porn ones have repeated (yet). It wouldn't surprise me if anonymouse uses cookies so that the advertisements would cycle to different ads when the same person accesses anonymouse.
It wouldn't surprise me if Proemio first accessed anonymouse so long ago that either, he's forgotten what the first ad is, or the ad cycle has changed, or anonymouse wasn't offering ads vs. $'s at the time.
FYI - I have also found that anonymouse cannot deal with large downloads (e.g. some youtubes) and gives you a "no cheese for you" message when it fails to find a site.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
| |
Proemio
General
Online
Zodiac:
Posts: 2570
|
|
Re: Ed Haas and the 'conversation in Hebrew'
on: February 06, 2007, 07:38:58 PM »
Post #59792 Reply to: PlanetQuo, at Post 59711
|
|
Where would NOLAJBS be without its' resident technical support manager? The creator of this forum.
So please spare me the bullshit about how smart and clever you are in 'sussing' the enemy 'infiltrators' within and 'banishing' them. You remain here because of who you are and what you do - not because you are an accomplished detector and exposer of 'little helpers'. You are here because of your importance to this forum. This forum could not function without you. You, in a peculiar way, are NOLAJBS. Peculiar indeed. It may come as a complete shock to you, but nolajbs.net was here long before me, and will be just fine after I have gone. My main intention was always openly displayed: "to give pretzel makers an indigestion", that you seem to have come down with a belly ache is the unfortunate consequence. You have my consent to attempt smearing me all you like, but trying to disparage the forum through me is dumb - really - tho your cheering section is likely to go delirious on the shear 'cunning'. 'Seriousness'? Are you trying to take the piss? A former IDF veteran stumbles across a conspiracy in a cemetery where he overhears three men say: "The Americans will learn what it is to live with terrorists after the planes hit the twins in September."
Some obscure writer, author and former military man, Ed Haas, claims that this IDF veteran, after having dilly-dallied for over six years, finally decides to 'go public', and approaches Ed Haas with his story. Haas' story is then IMMEDIATELY picked-up by well-known Zionist-denier and protector - Alex 'Israel could not carry-out these attacks' Jones - and within days Jones has Haas on his show thus promoting this tall-tale of a consipracy in a cemetery even further afield.
Israel had foreknowledge of 9-11, that we know as a verifiable fact, and Haas and Jones have embarked upon a damage-limitation exercise. The rabbis not only are behind 911, they also are in the process of trying to light the big match, and you DEMAND we obsess about a "he said, she said" situation? Or, which wannabe 'dear leader' should the sheep follow to TheTrueTruth to - where? It's an unresolvable diversion, while the chicken get twirled with ever greater insane intensity. It's also no different than discussing 'targeted' FAKOG (fast acting knock-out gas) in an airliner. You confirm this "unresolvability" by your own 'speculations' as to the motives of the various characters involved. That's all there is, another round of speculation about something unsubstantiated and making no difference whatsoever as to "who dunnit" - for that, there is more than enough to call a Grand Jury and worm up the gallows. You MUST know all that, or your self-assessed 'stature' is grossly overhyped... So, which is it: "rabbis' little helper" or "as dumb as vain"? I'm against you. Period. I know... |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
| |
DonnieDarko
Taking a sabbatical
Major General
Offline
Zodiac:
Posts: 1308
|
|
Re: Ed Haas and the 'conversation in Hebrew'
on: February 06, 2007, 07:53:58 PM »
Post #59798 Reply to: NOLAJBS, at Post 59753
|
|
This entire thread has lost it's course.
Moderate it (do your job) - censorship and anti-Free-Speech to some, even a 'benevolent' dictorship.
Unmoderated and you get this - a whole lot of gnashing of teeth.
So, what is the solution? Hell, all I wanted to know is why a kick ass "Zionist Disinfo Spotter" would have a "great deal of respect" for 2 of the more obvious willing/unwilling disinfo people we face. David Icke & Stan Monteith? Icke is self evident. Monteith is an excellent speaker on Cecil Rhodes and the Round Table Groups but REFUSES to use the term "zionist" or "jews". He will however use the terms Luciferian, OTO, Theosophical Society, Satanists, Lucius Trust, etc... adinfunatim... I admit to some strong language but I was shocked by the 2 seemingly incongruous p.o.v. The "rant" is quite simply amazing. The best I've seen. I say we have been visited by one Mr David Icke. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
| |
DonnieDarko
Taking a sabbatical
Major General
Offline
Zodiac:
Posts: 1308
|
|
Re: Ed Haas and the 'conversation in Hebrew'
on: February 06, 2007, 07:55:58 PM »
Post #59800 Reply to: Proemio, at Post 59792
|
|
Sighhhhhh...  Everyone needs a dose of "Desperate Housewives" every now and then.  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
| |
|
|
