I did see your winky face, but didn't necessarily take that to mean you were just cracking wise. At least SOMEONE else here has a sense of humour...

Maybe it's time you adopted a 'sig line'...

I agree wholeheartedly with that MO... unless you're just reduced to doing that because you're lacking in bandwidth.

I'm blessed with all the technological whizzbang - I just dislike distraction...

How utterly gay. Have you finished licking his arsehole out, Turan? Donnie Dorko's "honest and forthright" as hell, is he? He's spent the last 98 posts taking the piss out of Quo for saying he has a great deal of respect for Icke when he himself is all the way down with the lizard theory. Don't you think that's a bit disingenuous? And don't try and wriggle out of that Donnie, you little pillow-biter. It sounds lame, we have it in writing.

Donnie Disinfo is the most embarrassingly pathetic imbecile I've ever observed, and you just devoted a whole paragraph to kissing his little bum-bum. Donnie's whole argument hinges on the fact that Quo said he respects Icke, he's got nothing else. He's a broken fucking record.

Never mind why Quo respects Icke, you've got more explaining to do over how you can respect Dicko here.

Awww, you sought me out on myspasm. And you think I look like a "Tuff-guy", that's cute..

I think I may have struck a raw nerve there, with the Turan/Dicko romance. Such vitriol. I think you leeerve him.

No, I've read all the posts. I'm almost embarrassed to admit it though, they're so fucking long. Much ado about fuck all, really, this thread. And you're right, I'm just here to sling shit, it's fun. Look how upset little ponces like you get.

I really don't see why you're waiting with baited breath to hear the breaking news on why Quo respects Icke. How silly. He could say anything he likes, and the arse would fall out of your and Danny Dipshit's argument. I'll tell you what makes Icke "respectable": he was humiliated by Wogan on national television and didn't let it destroy him. He's a bit like Danny Dipshit in that respect; he seems to be able to withstand incredible amounts of shame without it bothering him.

Donnie says: "There is no "porn" in your web site? The screen shots simply show the "anonamous" logo that comes when using it.". I’m aware that my actual website contains on porn. I was referring to the link I posted and where the unsuspecting person who clicks onto it is taken. I would have thought the point was obvious since it is the LINK I was addressing, not my actual site. Others, too, have been experiencing the same thing (#59876). I contacted anonymouse (which is the responsibility of the administrator and not me or any other member), but have had only one reply requesting that I send the link in question onto them, which I did. I still await a reply. You said in a previous post "Thank God for DBS". With this in mind can you tell me why you are taking this matter so lightly considering that this "phenomena" regarding "linking to porn-sites" was actually used in an attempt to discredit DBS, not to mention the damage it did to Judicial inc. Whatever one's opinions are of Judicial inc, they did not ask nor deserve what occurred with them and if we are truly proponents of 'Free Speech' the matter ought to be addressed and not simply brushed aside as trivial. You seem to address with great zeal relatively trivial things, such as Icke, (whom I, too, respect on the principle of 'Free Speech' and his stance on it) yet brush aside what is potentially a dangerous and damaging "phenomena" that could, in fact, be used against anyone of us here, including yourself or do you think my attitude still "sucks" and that I'm behaving like a “primma donna”? You will note, too, that I use quotation marks in text that you ACTUALY wrote and not what I IMAGINED you wrote, ie. I never wrote "double agent" and yet you IMAGINE that I did (Post #59731). Who's confused here?