In response to:


Dick Turdpan replied:


And when he doesn't get an apology from those he has perceived to have wronged him, he cries like an infant whose mother has just removed her tit from his gob.

One word sums you up Shitbucket - PATHETIC.

Yep, they fit you to a t.

You keep on knitting together two stories, in an attempt to come up with a pretzel.
Pretzel: the introduction of disinfo, straight lie or smear, camouflaged in a word salad.

Story One:
Donnie paraphrased your 'thing' with Ike in various posts as either "admire", "respect". When you protested, he realized that you actually said "a great deal of respect". He subsequently used the correct quote, which 'appears' to reflect something substantially 'higher' than mere respect.

Story Two:
Observing the back-and-forth, I commented with the following paragraph here.
I don't know, but if someone would question how I possibly could "highly respect" some controversial figure(s), I would clarify that it is because of the figures' impeccable taste in cuffflinks and nothing else, instead of writing a 'thesis' about the questioner, combined with lengthy point-by-point disapprovals of apparently everything that "highly respected" person(s) stands for. It may be brilliant in style, but not terribly convincing in purpose; unless of course, I missed the purpose.

someone - someone is not you; it's Donnie at most, or anyone else in a similar sitution.

I obviously 'quote' the questioner (Donnie et al) not the one questioned (you).
Donnie could protest a misquote, by pretending the paragraph was NOT a parody - you can't.

Since you know all this, your points 1-7 "fit you to a t", especially 6, playing the eternal victim of a 'crime' that does not exist...

First of all, thank you for the courteous and civil manner in which you address the points I raised.


I do not doubt your sincerity, but I'm sure you'll agree that when communicating via the Internet, it is next to impossible to determine exactly who is who. People can say they come from any part of the world, and unless one possesses the technical ability and tools to trace the source of a communication, one cannot ever be certain as to the authenticity of those with whom one is communicating.

E-mail addresses can easily be forged so to disguise the sender's identity. Spoofing is not difficult, if one knows how.

You say that you know Donnie Darko well, but only by correspondence via e-mail. I'm sure you'll agree that communication and interaction that takes place in real-life offers much more reliable methods of acquainting oneself with another. I'm also sure you will see why Darko is under suspicion, not only by myself, but by dozens of others outwith this forum. Posting under a male pseudonym while stating in one's profile that 'he' is a actually a 'she', is not an effective way to persuade others of one's genuineness.

Numerous observers of this thread have made the same observations about your two friends as I have. We see many common traits, characteristics, traits, and mannerisms between the two. It will take some convincing that these two are not one and the same. Some will never be convinced. Both are abrasive. Both are aggressive. Both enjoy getting in people's faces. Both entered this thread and immediately began to launch verbal assaults on me. And that one enters the thread as the other leaves is highly suspect. That the successor picks-up where his/her predecessor left off, serves only to strengthen the depth of suspicion. Both clearly came looking for a fight.

That the former named associate attempts to link me with pedophilia is reprehensible and despicable. She did this not once, but twice. And in doing so, she has made an enemy for life. While the friends you choose is entirely your own private business, you will, however, realise that people often judge others by the company they keep.


I don't believe that I did misinterpret you. It is clear that Alex Jones retains support within this forum. I never said that it was unanimous. I was demonstrating that Alex Jones has not been discredited by this forum! If there are people here who still actively support and promote him, then it is evident that Jones has not been yet discredited! He has to you and I, and to anyone else who can see through his lies, deception, and obfuscation, but obviously not with those who still promote him.

The links that I speak of may not be of any importance to you, but they are to me and a lot of other interested parties. We believe these websites to be deceptive. In my previous response, I drew attention to the external websites that are promoted by this forum. None of these sites are exposing Israel's involvement in 9-11. On the contrary, they are concealing it, and sending people in the wrong direction. What both myself and those with whom I have discussed this issue find most strange, is why a forum that considers itself to be 'anti-Zionist' chooses to link to websites which do not attach any blame to Israel for the 9-11 attacks.


First of all, I would never advocate that my opponents be silenced. Challenged, yes. Censored or silenced, never. No true libertarian would ever advocate that his opponents be silenced.

I stated in this thread that I have a great deal of respect for four men. I am then immediately challenged by your friend Darko, subjected to a volley of insults and abuse, and have my character attacked because he objects to two of these men. Promeio joins the thread within a matter of hours of Darko's attacks, and he too challenges me. Not only does he challenge me on the same point as Darko, he casts aspersions over the timing of one of my posts. Your other associate, Turdpan, follows suit. I was more than challenged...I was fucking savaged. And all because this trio objected to me respecting a former BBC sports presenter.

Meanwhile, I discover that Darko believes in shape-shifting lizards. I discover that Madthumbs can openly promote the former Coventry City goalkeeper without Darko uttering as much as a syllable of condemnation. The blatant hypocrisy and double-standards on display here is truly nauseating. I discover that Lucidthots initiates a thread in which he/she states that 9-11 was not the work of the Zionist state of Israel and the murdering scumpigs that are the Mossad. No, according to Lucidthots, 9-11 was the work of the Bush Administration, the CIA, the FBI, and the NSA, and carried-out the behest of unnamed "International Bankers."

Lucidthots is perfectly entitled to believe what he chooses to regardless of how wrong he may be. I have no problem with that. I do, however, have a huge with the double-standards exist on NOLAJBS that permit Lucidthots to initiate a thread, not have that thread disrupted, hijacked, and turned into a war-zone, be subjected to personal abuse, insults, and character assassination, while the thread I initiated was destroyed. Darko, Promeio, and Turdpan have all stated that they have no interest in the discussion on Ed Haas and the conversation in Hebrew yet each persists in posting on this thread.

I got challenged and savaged for my beliefs, Lucidthots didn't for his. That was my point.


I agree that the destruction of this thread is a real loss. Debus wasn't a problem. He was there for the taking via intelligent argument. He argued his case, I argued mine. He lost. End of story. And just as the thread is returned to the topic under discussion, up pops Darko to spoil it, aided and abetted by Promeio. These two are the ones who killed this thread. I will leave the reader to draw their own conclusions as to what motives Darko and Promeio harboured.

I disagree about the personality clashes. As far as I am concerned, Darko and Promeio had no personalities to clash with. Miss Darko had an obsession with Lizards and a former BBC sports commentator, the General has a fixation with pretzels, poultry, and Rabbis. But of the two, Donnie darling was by far the most fun. Promeio I found to be dull, boring, and o far up his own arse that he can see what he ate for breakfast this morning. This guy is the human equivalent of Mogadon.


As you have already seen, I can shit-fling as good as any of the top shit-flingers on NOLAJBS. So bad has been the turd-tossing, that the walls of this forum need to be hosed, scrubbed, and disinfected. However, I did not join this forum to participate in a kak-slinging competition. I joined to take part in intelligent discussion and debate. My enemies seek to close this thread, but I will fight tooth-and-nail to keep it going. What happens next depends largely upon what moves my enemies make. All their moves are covered. I can keep this up indefinitely, but it would be in the best interests of NOLAJBS for me not to.

I end by once again thanking you for your courteousness and civility.

Where exactly, in the quoted thread, are shape-shifting lizards mentioned?  I took a quick browse and don't see mention of it.

Can someone tell me why NONADS likes to pretend it's members are in the military by titling them with shit like "Lance Corporal" and "General"? Is it just another game like Dungeons and Dragons that nerds like to play, or what? If so, how many hit points would Dummy Draggo have left by now? Surely he/she's in the red.

No.

The first of those two questions was actually quite sincere, I don't get it.

The shape-shifting lizards that you somehow didn't see are mentioned in the third paragraph from the bottom.

Brenda O'Connell's precise words were: