
|
Page last updated at 15:00 on 28th June 2007
"Lastly, I've never lied about a thing on this forum, not here, and not anywhere else, as far as I can honestly remember. If there are mistakes I can be called out on, show them to me. But I've lied about not one thing to the anti-Zionist community."
Jamie Linton Wake Up From Your Slumber - 24th May, 2007 ![]() Jamie Linton - also known as: Crimes of Zion Infensus Mentis Fester Quo Vadius Donnie Darko True Believer Brendon Lee O'Connell Brendon O'Connell ![]()
Jamie Linton - Wake Up From Your Slumber - 7th June, 2007
Brendon O'Connell - NOLAJBS - 10th April, 2007
|





|
PlanetSmear Strikes Back
"Secondly, I didn't write out in the NOLAJBS forum my own address in a way that could lead to anyone finding me. I revealed the city, suburb and street name. PlanetClouseau P.I. published the exact street number, my landline phone number that's used for my internet connection, and my IP details. And a big photo, but that was already public via my myspace profile, albeit in a much more innocuous context. Thanks a lot, dipshit."
Fucking Lowlife
"I deliberately didn't provide the actual number of my address, Queero. Scroll up: I revealed my address as "Fifth Ave, Mt Lawley". I'm not fucking stupid. You not only published my exact location on Fifth Ave, but you published on your site my IP address and my landline phone number, which, fortunately, is only used for my internet connection. That's about as low as it gets, you little cunt."
More on the PlanetQuo Smear Campaign
"Look at how he's stalked out my private details and published my IP address and my physical home address on his site."
"By the way, for the record: I don't have a landline telephone, only a mobile, like I said; but I do have an account with AAPT for my internet connection"
|










|
Title That hitpiece on me is lame. It hinges entirely on me being Donnie Darko, True Believer, Fester, Quo Vadius, and Brendan O'Connell, who I'm obviously not. And he knows this. Let me tell you why. 1. He has both O'Connell and my home addresses. They're different. 2. He has both our IP's, and they're different. 3. He has both our landline numbers, and they're different. And no, I didn't lie when I said I don't have a landline, because I don't. Not a landline telephone, only a mobile. They activated my landline account when I set up my internet account. You can ring it all day long, you'll only get whatever tone comes through when there's no phone on the end of it. 4. Brendon O'Connell reported me to the cops, and provided evidence of it by way of a link to a screenshot of the letter he got back from them, or the Ombudsman, whatever. I think it's pretty obvious that I'm not interested in reporting myself to the police, even for the sake of playing mindfuck games with Quo's head. 5. It's just obvious. He knows I'm not DD or QV or Fester, because we're totally different with regard to both our writing styles and our position on Smith and just about everything else. That's why you'll see no attempt at trying to prove it in the hitpiece. He just says it's so, and expects you to believe it. Well it isn't the case. So is Quo a liar, or just stupid? I don't believe it's the latter, so I'll stick with what I've said all along, which is that he's a liar. I've got a webcam right here to comfort anyone I care enough about, if they're stupid enough to fall for any of it. I'm James Linton; one address, one "phone" number, one physical body, and one IP address, and I'm not in the habit of reporting myself to the authoritahs. One thing you might notice in the hitpiece is that I stated my house number to be a two digit number. That's not true, there's three digits to it (as PlanetClouseau P.I has been kind enough to plaster all over his site for you). The reason for that, is because I didn't want anyone to know my address. Pretty understandable, I would've thought. But Quo asserts that because I'm actually Donnie Darko, I revealed my own address, which I then had to (as Infensus Mentis) refute, by saying that it only had two digits, not three, and therefore must be wrong. If you believe Quo, I had a very long, stupid argument with myself on the NOLAJBS forum, for no good reason, and reported myself to the police therein. It doesn't make sense, because it's bullshit. And very obvious bullshit, at that. You might also notice that although Quo has stated on this forum that he published "the whole she-bang" with regard to our email correspondence, all his myspace correspondence to me is missing. Only mine is there; you won't see what he wrote to me on myspace, i.e. that which I'm responding to in the emails. And I know why; it's because he's embarrassed about certain things he said. He was all happy and appreciative of the "friend" requests he got after meeting me, and he's probably a bit too shy to show that email in particular, not with all those exclamation marks. Also, seeing as he insists we were never "friends", he'd be loathe to produce anything in which he's being all happy and "friendly", calling me things like "bud" and being decidedly friendli-istic. But look at one of the only little pieces of Quo's writing you can see in our myspace correspondence on that page. This is what he says:
I guess he let that through because it wasn't as sucky and as "friendy" as the rest. Before you admonish me, qrswave, I hear you. It's the last I have to say on the matter. Crimes of Zion - Wake Up From Your Slumber -3rd June, 2007 |





![]() Nina over at MySpace. Give Nina a...give Nina a buzz. Go over there to Nina's space, it's Nina S, and tell her we want you as a radio host. We wanna...I'm gonna talk to her about maybe getting rehearsed and doing some interviews with some young people and campuses and college students, and she's...she's...a brave, hard-working, well-educated student aged...university age...gal who has an incredible grasp of...of...em...of this deception that we've all been living under for so many years. And she's got a wit...and a...and an insight that's well beyond her years. Wonderful, wonderful hard-worker, and we're hoping to put some...some audio files out from Nina if she's gonna have the time because she's a very busy person, but give her little site....a little...her MySpace site a look, and send her a message tell her Daryl Said hi. Daryl Bradford Smith - September, 2006 |










|
MESSAGE SENT THROUGH YOUR WEBSITE
This form was submitted: Mar 28 2007 / 22:59:33
by a visitor with this IP Address: xx.xx.xx.xx userid = QuoDotNet
Name = Scott Email = judasmclean@hotmail.com Message = Regarding your recent NOLAJBS article, you seem to associate pretty closely with Infensus Mentis who promotes a whole load of deceptive bullshit on his myspace such as Press for truth, 911TruthNY, "Illuminazi" Prison Planet, Infowars etc. I recently commented him about it after he sent a deceptive bulletin about PNAC (the exact words escape me) I responded that it was a Zionist plan for domination of the Middle East. He responded "PNAC is about AMERICAN imperialism via Zionism" I asked what American imperialism is and I claimed it is non-existent (certainly to anyone who knows about the structure of Zionist power in America). To which he responded with a picture of a child with his brain hanging out telling me to tell that to the dead child. That is blatant emotional manipulation disinfo. This is not an attack at you, I agree with a lot of your stuff but I'd take a closer look at who hangs about you before making people guilty by association. Which leads me onto my next point. Everyone is slandering Opposing Digits for no other reason than Daryl going off them one day and claiming that they're Satanists. I think OD has raised valid points about Daryl which he has failed to respond to. Unless I've missed something I can't see any valid reason to slander them. Perhaps you could clarify?
Thanks
Scott
|

.|
From: <planetquo@hotmail.co.uk>
To: <judasmclean@hotmail.com> Subject: NOLAJBS >Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2007 01:17:10 +0100 Hello Scott,
Thank you for your e-mail.
Infensus Mentis is an Australian bloke, who, like yourself, is a MySpace friend. He joined NOLAJBS a few weeks after I did and ended-up becoming embroiled in the fighting that took place. It was through our experience of NOLAJBS that we began communicating with one another. Prior to that, we had never spoken.
I share your disapproval of some of the information that Infensus has posted on his MySpace profile. Indeed, I have already discussed this with him. I have advised him that it would be smart to cease promoting Alex Jones and all the other disinformation artists but he declined to heed my advice. In the end, it is his profile, and he is free to maintain it as he likes.
To say that I "associate pretty closely" with Infensus is wide-of-the-mark. I don't. The only people listed as friends on my MySpace profile with whom I maintain any close association with are Fugazi, Michael and Eric Hufschmid. I rarely speak with anyone else. To be honest Scott, I have neither the time nor the inclination to 'hang-out' on MySpace. My first priorities are PlanetQuo.Com and PlanetQuo.Net. I see MySpace as just another outlet for my message.
I have not read the bulletin by Infensus that you refer to therefore can offer no comment on its content. You would, however, have been correct in your analysis regarding the Zionist plan for domination of the Middle East, and, ultimately, the entire planet. I would also agree that Infensus' pictorial response is an inappropriate method of addressing the objections you raised.
With regard to emotional manipulation, my own personal view is that no form of manipulation - emotional or otherwise - can be successful unless the person being manipulated agrees to be manipulated. A manipulator cannot manipulate without the victim's consent. The ploy only works if one allows it to.
Which people am I making guilty by association, Scott? Are you referring to NOLAJBS or Opposing Digits? If it is the former, then I would strongly refute the charge. The NOLAJBS forum makes itself guilty. I'm just the researcher who is drawing attention to the fact that they promote deceptive 9-11 websites and link to Christian Zionist religious groups while trying to portray themselves as anti-Zionist.
If your comments were made with regard to Opposing Digits, I would again strongly disagree with you. PlanetQuo has no opinion on the dispute that exists between Daryl Bradford Smith and Opposing Digits. I really don't care if Daryl thinks that Madthumbs is a Satanist, or if Madthumbs thinks that Daryl is a crypto-Christian. I have expressed no opinion on that particular issue nor will I. As I say, I don't care.
To the best of my knowledge, Smith has said very little in public with regard to Opposing Digits. Madthumbs, on the other hand, has had an awful lot to say about Daryl. Regardless of who might be right and who might be wrong, there can be no doubt whatsoever that Madthumbs is the one with the bee in his bonnet since it is he who is doing all the attacking.
You say that "everyone is slandering Opposing Digits for no other reason than Daryl going off them one day and claiming that they're Satanists." I have to admit that I was unaware that so many people are attacking Opposing Digits. Being attacked is all part and parcel of the information war. One is going to be attacked regardless of whatever viewpoint one is expressing. That is the nature of the beast. A thick skin and lots of self-belief are required to insulate oneself from the inevitable attacks! Madthumbs has attacked Smith on a regular basis, and when one attacks others, one will in turn be attacked. That's the rules of engagement.
The only issue that I have with Opposing Digits concerns Debus - a self-admitted Zionist shill - who Smith exposed last December. Debus and I locked horns on the NOLAJBS forum but rather than do battle there, he swanned-off to Opposing Digits and attacked me from there! This is what he said about me. Debus appears to be held in high esteem by Madthumbs. I find that rather strange given Debus' confession. Don't you? Debus will figure prominently in part two of my NOLAJBS expose, and I will be drawing people's attention to some of the posts that he has made on Opposing Digits.
Until now, I have made no public statements concerning any aspect of Opposing Digits. Indeed, the only reference that I have ever made to that forum was in part one of my NOLAJBS expose. This is what I wrote:
"Smith tells of how the previous forum that he was involved with - Opposing Digits - suckered him in. Daryl obviously made an error of judgment in getting involved with OD, and he erred again in promoting NOLAJBS. But to his credit he did forewarn of Zionist deception in the NOLAJBS forum."
I have merely repeated what Smith said during his broadcast of December 5th. And since his association with Opposing Digits ended in animosity, common logic decrees that Smith made an error of judgment! Think about it, Scott!! This is not an attack on Opposing Digits, it is a public criticism of Daryl Bradford Smith. I am stating unequivocally that Daryl exercised bad judgment with regard to Opposing Digits and NOLAJBS. Do the subsequent events that have unfolded since not bear witness to what I am saying here? I doubt very much if Daryl will involve himself with another forum ever again. Twice bitten, once shy! My experience at NOLAJBS has soured my perception of forums too. Never again.
I trust that what I have stated in this correspondence has provided you with the clarification you seek. I also trust that you will see that I have not slandered Opposing Digits. I didn't even criticise them! I will conclude by asking you to clarify which people you feel that I am making guilty by association. Opposing Digits or NOLAJBS?
Regards
Jim |



|
"Keep your friends close, and your enemies closer" |