Crimes of Zion Exposed

Crimes of Zion: "He has both O'Connell and my home addresses. They're different."

PlanetQuo: Untrue. I do not have Brendon O'Connell a.k.a. Brendon Lee O'Connell's home address. O'Connell has stated on several occasions that he lives in Esperance, western Australia, but I could find no listing in the Australian Whitepages for anyone with the surname of O'Connell and the initials B or B L who resides in Esperance or in Scarborough, Perth.

O'Connell has also stated that he lives in Perth, and the only listings for anyone with the surname of O'Connell and the initial B resident in the Perth area are this listing and this one, and since there are clear discrepancies in O'Connell's statements vis a vis his precise location, I have used his IP address to determine his whereabouts. O'Connell's IP address traces back to a suburb of Perth. This suburb of Perth, western Australia, is also the precise geographical location to where Jamie Linton's a.k.a. Crimes of Zion IP address also emanates from.

Indeed, Crimes of Zion is far better placed to know O'Connell's physical address than I am, since Crimes of Zion claims to have a friend named Gary who is an Australian Federal Police agent with "security clearance" and who, according to Crimes of Zion, can track people down. Don't accept Jim Kerr's word though - accept Jamie Linton's. It was, after all, Jamie Linton who spoke them.

And if what Crimes of Zion boasts of is true, then Crimes of Zion and his friend in the Australian Federal Police will be prime suspects should anyone of my Australian associates or contacts ever have their actual physical addresses published on any Internet forums or websites, have their actual physical address used to fraudulently open Internet connection accounts under a false name, or suddenly start receiving unwarranted police attention, then Jamie and Gary will be the first to come under suspicion.

As for me having Crimes of Zion's home address, this is also untrue. Crimes of Zion has made two entirely contradictory statements regarding his physical address. On 14th February, he stated that his house number comprised of two digits but has recently changed his mind. Apparently, his house number has three digits, and if so, then Crimes of Zion lied when he said that his house number comprises of two-digits. How can I possibly be certain of Crimes of Zion's exact physical address when he evidently isn't certain himself?

Crimes of Zion: "He has both our IP's, and they're different."

PlanetQuo: What does this prove? It proves nothing other than that whoever connects to the Internet from close to the Mount Lawley suburb of the western Australian city of Perth under the names of Jamie Linton and Brendon O'Connell, does so via two separate connections. Several of my real-life friends all have access to two separate Internet connections. Each has an Internet connection at home, and each has an Internet connection located in their own private office, or at their emloyer's place of work. Using a laptop computer, each of my friends are able to access the Internet via two different IP addresses.

Since all of my friends live and work in the English city of Sheffield, all of the IP addresses that my friends use to connect to the Internet will ultimately trace back to Sheffield. It is therefore entirely possible for Jamie Linton to connect to the Internet via either of the two address in Fifth Avenue, Mount Lawley, Perth that he has stated on two separate occasions to be his actual physical address, and from another connection elsewhere in the Mount Lawley area, or any other suburb of Perth.

The fact is, Jamie Linton and Brendon O'Connell's IP addresses emanate from precisely the same geographical location. Linton and O'Connell therefore live in the same suburb of the same city in western Australia. An inconvenient fact for Jamie Linton, but a fact nonetheless.

Crimes of Zion: "He has both our landline numbers, and they're different. And no, I didn't lie when I said I don't have a landline, because I don't. Not a landline telephone, only a mobile. They activated my landline account when I set up my internet account. You can ring it all day long, you'll only get whatever tone comes through when there's no phone on the end of it."

PlanetQuo: Another false statement. I do not have O'Connell's landline number as I explained in the opening paragraphs, and even if I did have O'Connell's telephone number, how would Linton know? I do not recall us ever having a conversation where O'Connell's phone number was discussed nor have I ever made any public statements in respect of O'Connell's landline telephone number other than what has been stated on this particular page. I do not know O'Connell's landline telephone number because I could find no listing in the Australian Whitepages for a B O'Connell or a BL O'Connell.

Linton stated on 14th February that he doesn't have a landline. A landline and a landline telephone are two entirely distinct things. Since Linton has previously stated that he has spoken with his "good friend" Nina on the telephone, and unless Linton used someone else's landline/mobile telephone to call her, the conversations that he has held with her could only have been conducted via his mobile phone. Linton therefore must have dollars to burn if he can afford to be making long-distance calls from Australia to America on his mobile phone. It would save Mr. C.O. Zion an awful lot of Shekels if he were to use a landline telephone instead, don't you think?

Crimes of Zion: "Brendon O'Connell reported me to the cops, and provided evidence of it by way of a link to a screenshot of the letter he got back from them, or the Ombudsman, whatever. I think it's pretty obvious that I'm not interested in reporting myself to the police, even for the sake of playing mindfuck games with Quo's head."

Yet another false statement. O'Connell reported James Linton to David Johnston, Senator for western Australia and the Minister for Justice and Customs. Here is a copy of the letter that O'Connell says he received the Senator's office. Note that the letter does not come from either the Australian police, or from 'the Ombudsman', or from "whatever", and that the only relevance of the police vis a vis Linton's statement is that his friend and neighbour, Gary, is an Australian Federal Police agent; that Linton has had "some bad experiences" with the Australian police; and that he has nightmares about the police - "literally."

It does seem logical though, that Australian criminals would live in fear of being investigated by the Australian police, and it is also logical that an Australian Zionist should be in awe of a British anti-Zionist. Linton bears all the traits of a Zionist operative, and this should come as no surprise since all the evidence indicates that he is part of the criminal Zionist network.

Jamie Linton a.k.a. Crimes of Zion is someone who, according to Daryl Bradford Smith and Eric Hufschmid, is to be considered part of the criminal Zionist network. Smith and Hufschmid's supporters need not all rush at once to investigate this criminal Zionist network member though - I've already saved them the effort, time and trouble. And who might you have investigated with "no blind obedience" and "no exceptions" lately? Where exactly, may I peruse the reports of your investigations of the criminal Zionist network based on due diligence and meticulous research, you hypocrites?

"Unless the person who is ostensibly using the Po and Debus handles is deliberately being sloppy with Debus' writing to throw people off, it aint the same dude. I don't think it's logical to deduce that they're the same person on the basis of their writing style."

Crimes of Zion - 1st May, 2007

Crimes of Zion: "It's just obvious. He knows I'm not DD or QV or Fester, because we're totally different with regard to both our writing styles and our position on Smith and just about everything else. That's why you'll see no attempt at trying to prove it in the hitpiece. He just says it's so, and expects you to believe it."

PlanetQuo: Do I really? Since I've already stated that I believe Donnie Darko, Quo Vadius and Fester to be pseudonyms used by Jamie Linton, and since I've also stated on several occasions that I believe Jamie Linton and Brendon O'Connell to be one and the same, it is disingenuous for Linton to claim that I "know" he is not "DD or QV or Fester."

Linton informs us that he cannot be O'Connell since both are "totally different" in respect of writing styles. This is a rather weak premise, and once again, Linton demonstrates his disingenuousness. It would be a relatively straightforward exercise for an intelligent, skilled writer of Crimes of Zion's stature to write articles in the style of a "fucking idiot." Take a look at the writing style that Linton adopted in this Alien abduction forum:

No wonder Linton had to return to PlanetQuo: Lies and Deceit to change the title of his blog entry from PlanetClouseau PI: Idiot Savant to PlanetClouseau P.I. Debunked. Idiot.

For Brendon O'Connell, me having had my left forearm severed in an accident almost 20 years ago is something considered worthy of mentioning on a regular basis. Jamie Linton a.k.a. Crimes Of Zion also considers my physical disability to be an issue worthy of frequent mention, and I leave it to you, dear reader, to deduce why me having my left forearm missing should be of any relevance in the first place nevermind be an issue to which Linton/O'Connell feel compelled to make continual reference to.

I would sooner suffer the physical disability I have successfully lived with for almost two decades than be afflicted with the common psychological impairments that the immature James Linton/Brendon O'Connell evidently suffer from. At the time of my life-changing accident, Linton/O'Connell would've been young teenage boys whose balls would only recently have dropped, and it is a teenage mindset in which Linton/O'Connell appear to be stuck. In any case, their puerile insults are water off a duck's back. Sticks and stones.

As for O'Connell's and Linton's positions on Daryl Bradford Smith, are they really that different? More to the point, is the modus operandi of Linton or O'Connell any different at all? The more one scrutinises Jamie Linton and Brendon O'Connell, the more remarkable and obvious their common characteristics become. O'Connell drew first blood by starting the now infamous NOLAJBS fight, and Linton repeated the exact same tactic when he too drew first blood on Wake Up From Your Slumber. Linton and O'Connell also refer to me as a "little fuck."

Quo Vadius has recently become a prolific poster at Liberty Forum in much the same way that Crimes of Zion has recently become such a prolific poster at Wake Up From Your Slumber. Quo Vadius last posted on this particular thread on 25th May before suddenly quitting posting on Liberty Forum, only to once again reinvent himself and return on 9th June as Quo Vadis.

Quo Vadis has already confirmed that he is Brendon O'Connell. Having received an e-mail from one James Townley of Chillingham, New South Wales, O'Connell used the excuse of a "lost password", which, incidentally, but not coincidentally, was the very same excuse that the entity known as Fester - instigator of the Daryl Bradford Smith Indicted post on Wake Up From Your Slumber - used in an admission to Crimes of Zion after Poseidon exposed him as being the person who was operating the Lotus pseudonym.

I invite you, dear reader, to compare how the entities that are Brendon O'Connell who lives in Esperance and Perth, and Brendon Lee O'Connell who resides in Perth, fused to become the infamous Donnie Darko, who, like Crimes of Zion, introduced himself in a most hostile, abusive, insulting, disparaging, arrogant fashion. My self-proclaimed "good friend" has behaved in exactly the same manner as my sworn enemy did.

Ally these facts to the fact that Jamie Linton has also been very busy recently attempting to reinvent himself. First we have the reinvention of the Mark Dice-respecting, Alex Jones-promoting Infensus Mentis as the Mark Glenn-promoting Crimes of Zion. From Infenus Mentis the Alex Jones promoter to Infensus Mentis the 'anti-Zionist'. From "9-11 was an inside job" to "9-11 was an inside-out job" to "9-11 was an Israeli job" we go. Round and round a carousel of lies and deception we are spun.

Quite how someone who purports themselves to be an exposer of Zionist crimes expects to be taken seriously while they are promoting Terrorstorm is beyond my logic, since Terrorstorm completely ignores the King David hotel bombing, the Lavon Affair and a host of other incidences of Zionist terrorism - 9-11 in particular. Terrorstorm makes no reference whatsoever to the five dancing Israelis arrested on 9-11, which should come as no great surprise since Alex Jones is on the record as saying that he has "done the research" and concludes that "Israel could not carry out thse attacks." How can someone who professes themselves to be an 'anti-Zionist' use someone who covers-up Zionist crimes as a source of 'truth' and expect to be credible?

But who, except Crimes of Zion himself, has ever said that Crimes of Zion had credibility?

As far as I am aware, Smith has only ever once publicly mentioned PlanetQuo by name - on 21st March, I believe. He hasn't mentioned my name since.

Suzette? Yes....in consecutive rants that were broadcast by Daryl Bradford Smith within days of each other.

I challenge anyone to sift through the comments that Crimes of Zion posted on the Daryl Bradford Smith Indicted thread and find a post where Crimes Of Zion criticises Daryl Bradford Smith in any meaningful way. Crimes of Zion's position on Smith is adequately demonstrated by the absence of any constructive criticism, and although the post was an "indictment" of Daryl Bradford Smith, Crimes of Zion, with the assistance of his good friend - who he proclaims as kosher - his associate and his posting-partner, Nina a.k.a. A Possum Princess a.k.a Eireann Goddess - phoney forum Queen extraordinaire - switched it to an indictment of PlanetQuo. Still the attacks continue unabated.

Go figure.

It is no coincidence that these two blog entries on Wake Up From Your Slumber were critical of Daryl Bradford Smith and Eric Hufschmid. Nor is it coincidental that this blog entry also attracted Daryl Bradford Smith and Crimes of Zion's mutual "wonderful, wonderful" friend and "totally innocent" associate. Crimes of Zion and A Possum Princess came to Smith's rescue long before he made his rallying call.

Go figure.

Prior to Crimes of Zion's reinvention of himself as an 'anti-Zionist', he was, in his Infensus Mentis incarnation, a strong supporter and promoter of Alex Jones, a promoter of a variety of other deceivers, and a promoter of Zionist protectors, and Infensus Mentis a.k.a. Crimes of Zion should be incurring the wrath of the The French Connection for his promotion of Poseidon yet he is not. Smith and Hufschmid's silence on Crimes of Zion speaks volumes - it tells us all we need to know about the hypocrisy of Smith and Hufschmid.

Go figure.

On the face of it, only an idiot would dare make a statement such as this with a history such as this, but Crimes Of Zion is no idiot. Au contraire, un personne deficiente de savant, perhaps, but blessed with intelligence nonetheless. 'Idiot savant' is a term that Crimes of Zion used on a previous occasion - at 19:32 on Thursday, 17th May, 2007 to be precise......

The 'IDF summer camp' "allegation" to which Crimes of Zion refers seems more of an admission than an "allegation", and certainly not a statement that one would expect to be heard from a friend and associate of Daryl Bradford Smith. Likewise, no self-respecting, anti-Zionist would be seen dead wearing a t-shirt with the logo of the Israel Defence Forces printed on the front. Regardless of her rationale for publicly displaying herself wearing a t-shirt with the IDF logo on the front, Crimes Of Zion's "good friend" disgraces herself, and Crimes Of Zion disgraces himself for attempting to defend the indefensible and then boasting of how he "debunked" the "allegation."

No genuine anti-Zionist that I know of would contemplate even touching the Talmud nevermind allow themselves to be photographed grinning broadly while apparently eating a copy of the Satanic bible. I know I certainly wouldn't, and neither would my friends Michael or Suzette. Remember, it is a "good friend" and associate of the 'anti-Zionist' Crimes Of Zion who features in these photographs - not any good friend or associate of the anti-Zionist PlanetQuo.

Osama Bradford Smith has, according to the "good friend" and associate of Smith's friend and associate, proclaimed me to be an "idiot savant." Crimes Of Zion assures us that Smith's psychoanalytical assessment of PanetQuo is "firsthand information" that Crimes Of Zion was privy to "from "well before" I made public the reasons for terminating my support for and promotion of Daryl Bradford Smith. And since Crimes of Zion is on the record as stating that he has "seen a screenshot" of the remarks Daryl Bradford Smith has allegedly made in respect of myself, Crimes Of Zion's revelation raises several questions that need to be addressed.

Jamie Linton is invited to post answers to the following questions on the PlanetQuo: Lies and Deceit blogspot that he created on 6th June.

Question one: The obvious question. Since the central tenet of the 'case' that Crimes of Zion has presented on Wake Up From Your Slumber and PlanetQuo: Lies and Deceit is that he was a "good friend" of mine who was "betrayed", I must enquire as to what Crimes of Zion's reasons might be for not sharing with me, the "firsthand information" that he claims to have been in possession of "well before" I publicly disclosed any information pertinent to my decision to no longer support or promote Daryl Bradford Smith. One would have expected such a "good friend" to have warned me that someone who I was supporting and promoting, and held in high regard, was bad-mouthing me in private while praising me in public. That my "good friend" failed to alert me to Smith's treachery should tell you all you need to know about my "good friend."

Question two: The six million dollar question. How did Linton acquire the "firsthand information" that he claims to be in possession of? That Linton himself defines this information as "firsthand" suggests this information came directly from Daryl Bradford Smith. If so, then Daryl Bradford Smith would need to explain why he is participating in online conversations with an individual who, by Smith's very own decree, is to be considered part of the Zionist network.

If, on the other hand, Crimes of Zion, did not receive this "firsthand information" direct from Daryl Bradford Smith, then from whom did he receive it? Who, do you think, might have been best-placed to know Daryl Bradford Smith's true opinion of PlanetQuo? To whom might Smith have expressed the opinion that I am an "idiot savant"? Who has his ear? With whom does he hold regular telephone conversations?

Since I have found no evidence of Daryl Bradford Smith having ever publicly made the remarks that Crimes Of Zion has attributed to him, I can therefore but assume that Smith's remarks were made during the course of an online conversation. And if Daryl Bradford Smith did actually refer to me as an "idiot savant" in an online conversation, then I must assume that these remarks were made via an instant messenger programme such as Yahoo, MSN or ICQ, since his friend and phone-pal Nina tells us that Daryl cannot network via SKYPE due to him connecting to the Internet from his dilapidated farmhouse in America...oops...sorry...France...via a 56k dial-up.

So that the authenticity of the claim that Crimes Of Zion makes can be ascertained, I hereby challenge Jamie Linton to publish in PlanetQuo: Lies and Deceit, the screenshot that he claims to have seen wherein Smith refers to me as an "idiot savant." For the record, PlanetQuo does not believe that Daryl Bradford Smith has ever made such remarks, and until if and when Crimes of Zion furbishes evidence to the contrary, the allegation that he has made against Smith will remain yet another of his lies and deceptions - the product of Jamie Linton's warped and perverted mind.

Only Daryl Bradford Smith, Crimes of Zion, or Nina a.k.a. A Possum Princess know the truth of the matter, but since it is Crimes of Zion who has publicly stated that he has "seen a screenshot" of Daryl Bradford Smith referring to me as an "idiot savant", then the onus lies entirely with Crimes of Zion to supply the evidence that would substantiate his claim. Crimes of Zion has, of course, placed himself in quite a dilemma. If he does publish the screenshot that he claims to have seen, he confirms that either himself or his "good friend" and associate Nina have been having online conversations with Daryl Bradford Smith. But if he fails to provide evidence of his claim, he stands accused of lies, deception and slander. His mistake - his predicament.

Regardless of which option Jamie Linton chooses, he cannot ever escape the fact that the "conclusive evidence" of me being "a liar" - of which he has continually boasted about on Wake Up From Your Slumber for the last month - is false, and that his claim of me being his "good friend" is now completely discredited. And since Crimes of Zion did not share with me the "firsthand information" he was privy to, the credibility of the 'case' against me upon which "good friend" claim is entirely based has now collapsed in tatters.

Crimes of Zion, as I have repeatedly stated was never any friend of mine. Indeed, the only people who have stated Jamie Linton to be a "good friend" of mine are Jamie Linton himself and his alter-ego, Brendon O'Connell. Linton lied when he stated that I had "publicly declared" him as a "good friend" on the NOLAJBS forum, and it is most telling indeed that in the recent comments that he has posted on Wake Up From Your Slumber, Crimes of Zion no longer refers to me as his "good friend." I have already provided proof positive that I have never publicly declared Jamie Linton as a "good friend" and remain content to let the evidence speak for itself.

Crime of Zion's claim of "outing" me as "a liar" pre-dates the creation of his PlanetQuo: Lies and Deceit blogspot. The allegation of me being "a liar" was first made on 17th May on Wake Up From Your Slumber, and it is by the claims Linton made just under a month ago that his "outing" of me as "a liar" are to be judged. Linton has stated numerous times on Wake Up From Your Slumber and elsewhere that he has "conclusively proven" that I am "a liar." His "conclusive" 'evidence' is based entirely on the following three sentences that I wrote to in an e-mail that was sent to him on 24th April:

"I give you my word that any information that you give me regarding Nina aka 'A Possum Princess' will not be published on any of my websites or shared with Eric Hufschmid. Nina is under investigation. I am interested solely in her relationships with Daryl Bradford Smith and Joe Molero and Madthumbs."

Since none of the information that Crimes of Zion relayed to me from his "good friend", associate and posting-partner, Nina, was published on any of my websites or shared with the webmaster of the French Connection prior to Crime of Zion's opening volley of attacks of 17th May, how, then, can I have possibly broken my word? And while I did disclose that particular information to Suzette for the sole purpose of exposing Nina a.k.a A Possum Princess a.k.a. Eireann Goddess on 4th May, I did not give Crimes of Zion my word that I would not disclose any information that he gave me to Suzette. The information that Crimes of Zion relayed to me on Nina's behalf was published on PlanetQuo.Net AFTER Crimes on Zion began attacking me on 17th May. A compilation of the e-mail correspondence that Infensus Mentis and I shared prior to his reinvention as Crimes of Zion can be perused here.

Since Crimes of Zion's cohort Nina had already told him on 25th April to "....divulge whatever you wish...", the case that Crimes of Zion has presented against me has no basis. Crimes of Zion has yet to fully explain how he comes to perceive me sharing information which Nina had already permitted to be shared contsitutes an act of "betrayal" on my part. He will, of course, keep referring back to our 'friendship' like a worn stylus that has become stuck in the groove, but as I have already stated on numerous occasions, Jamie Linton was never any friend of mine. I choose my friends carefully. Linton was never anything other than an online contact who initiated contact with me in mid-January, and with whom I terminated communication with towards the end of April.

I assure you, dear reader, that never would I contemplate forming a friendship with someone so abnormal to the point of being capable of raping my family, and that is something upon which I give you my word.

And if anyone should wonder why I flagged Crimes of Zion as a suspected enemy infiltrator during the early stages of our 'friendship', my reasoning should now be self-evident. Indeed, crystal should be opaque by comparison.

While the emotionally-disturbed Crimes of Zion has yet to state exactly where he stands in respect of Daryl Bradford Smith, we know exactly where Daryl Bradford Smith stands in respect of the criminal Zionist network to which he makes frequent reference.

Since Crimes of Zion promotes Mark Glenn, Crimes of Zion should, by Daryl Bradford Smith and Eric Hufschmid's very own definition, be considered a Zionist criminal operating within a network of other criminal Zionists, and if Mark Glenn were to continue promoting Crimes of Zion, I would begin to harbour very serious reservations about Mark Glenn. Mark Glenn is strongly advised to ceasing promoting Crimes of Zion.

Crimes of Zion: "That's why you'll see no attempt at trying to prove it in the hitpiece. He just says it's so, and expects you to believe it."

PlanetQuo: On the contrary, I have made a great effort and gone to considerable lengths to support what I say with evidence, and the body of evidence that I have assembled is the result of many, many, many hours of laborious and meticulous research. I back-up what I say with facts, and am perfectly content to lay my research out in front of the reader and let them reach their own conclusion. I don't expect anyone to believe what I say, I would, however, fully expect any truthseeker of a diligent disposition to examine the facts that I present. I am more than happy to let the evidence speak for itself for it is upon this evidence that one of us will fall - and it won't be PlanetQuo who eventually collapses in a heap of discredit. Crime of Zion's days are numbered.

Crimes of Zion: "Well it isn't the case. So is Quo a liar, or just stupid? I don't believe it's the latter, so I'll stick with what I've said all along, which is that he's a liar. I've got a webcam right here to comfort anyone I care enough about, if they're stupid enough to fall for any of it. I'm James Linton; one address, one "phone" number, one physical body, and one IP address, and I'm not in the habit of reporting myself to the authoritahs."

PlanetQuo: So it's all just a huge 'coincidence' that Jamie Linton and Brendon O'Connell 'just happen' to live in the same suburb of the same city in the same region of Australia, and both entities 'just happen' to end-up doing battle with the same bloke in Sheffield, England in Internet forums? What is the probability of such an occurrence? What would be the odds of such a 'coincidence'? Millions-to-one at least, I reckon.

Linton's case against me being a liar, as he has alleged on numerous occasions, hinges exclusively on his claim that I was his "good friend" and that I "betrayed" him. As I have already stated, Jamie Linton was never any "good friend" of mine. He is my sworn enemy. He always was and always will be. He and his "good friend" Nina tried to set me up but failed miserably. Linton had been under suspicion as an enemy infiltrator for months. I played along with him. He was outsmarted, outmanoeuvred and finally exposed for who and what he is, and he doesn't like it. Too bad for him - he ought to have carefully considered the consequences of declaring war on me before launching an all-out nuclear attack. Crimes of Zion WILL be repaid in kind for this outrage.

So, Linton has a webcam that he will use to "comfort" those he "cares enough about." It stands to reason that he hasn't webcammed with Nina yet, since she is "just a piss in the sea." One does wonder why Daryl Bradford Smith's favourite "wonderful, wonderful" gal bothers at all with Linton given that he thinks so little of her. Don't forget folks that when Linton was made aware that Nina was going to be exposeded, his response was:

"But ultimately, I don't care. Go ahead and expose her, "make her pay" etc etc. Heh heh. But don't be breaking your promise to me."

Linton was concerned only with holding me to my 'promise'. He evidently cares not for this "totally innocent" "little girl" who is now his "good friend." Go figure - it isn't too difficult to figure out.

Linton proclaims anyone who believes my version of events to be "stupid." This is a measure of his arrogance. I make no such judgment, I am content to let the evidence do all the talking. Perhaps the dozens of "stupid" people with whom I am acquainted might care to request a webcam session with Jamie Linton to "comfort" themselves. I would, however, urge my female friends, acquaintances, associates, contacts and supporters to exercise great caution - Linton has a webcam fetish, and may invite you to indulge him in his sexual fantasies. I would, however, certainly not wish my Mum - or anyone else's mother for that matter - to contact Linton under any circumstances whatsoever. This guy is evidently a seriously emotionally disturbed individual who urgently needs professional help and psychiatric counselling.

"One address, one "phone" number, one physical body, and one IP address", Linton informs us, but it simply isn't true. His very own statements decree that he has two addresses. One with a two-digit house number, the other with a three-digit number. So unless the apparently rolling-in-money James Linton owns two properties in the rather expensive Perth suburb of Jewtown....oops....sorry....Mount Lawley, then he is, by his own testimony, a proven liar.

One IP address - that 'coincidentally' emanates from the exact same geographical location as Brendon O'Connell's.

Crimes of Zion: "One thing you might notice in the hitpiece is that I stated my house number to be a two digit number. That's not true, there's three digits to it (as PlanetClouseau P.I has been kind enough to plaster all over his site for you). The reason for that, is because I didn't want anyone to know my address. Pretty understandable, I would've thought. But Quo asserts that because I'm actually Donnie Darko, I revealed my own address, which I then had to (as Infensus Mentis) refute, by saying that it only had two digits, not three, and therefore must be wrong. If you believe Quo, I had a very long, stupid argument with myself on the NOLAJBS forum, for no good reason, and reported myself to the police therein. It doesn't make sense, because it's bullshit. And very obvious bullshit, at that."

Linton specifically stated on the NOLAJBS forum on 14th February, that his house number has two digits. He is now telling us that this statement is "not true." In other words, he lied - plain and simple. He presented information to a public forum that he knew to be false. That is a fact. A verifiable fact. A documented fact. A proven fact.

Crimes of Zion insults our intelligence when he tells us that he, of his own freewill, published details of his physical address because he "didn't want anyone to know his address." What kind of absurd statement is this? This statement is more absurd than Linton's 'technical lie' howler.

Publishing all the details of his physical address, minus the actual house number, in a Zionist-controlled forum is akin to walking around Mount Lawley wearing a t-shirt with *ami* *into* printed on the front while hoping nobody ever deduces your name.

Publishing all of one's physical address in a public forum minus the house number, and not expecting anyone to be smart enough to search the Australian Whitepages, is stretching the imagination somewhat. Brendon O'Connell was the first to deduce James Linton's exact whereabouts, and O'Connell was also the first person to publicly disclose what Linton says is his true address. Brendon O'Connell was the person who supposedly reported James Linton to the Minister of Justice, and Brendon O'Connell was the first person to attack me on NOLAJBS. Jamie Linton was the first to attack me on Wake Up From Your Slumber, and Brendon O'Connell just happens to live in the exact same suburb of the same city in western Australia.

To believe what Crimes of Zion would like you to believe means placing great faith in coincidence theory since there are just too many 'coincidences' that connect James Linton and Brendon O'Connell. Others can believe whatever they like, but I'm having none of it. Jamie Linton and Brendon O'Connell are one and the same. End of story.

Crimes of Zion: "You might also notice that although Quo has stated on this forum that he published "the whole she-bang" with regard to our email correspondence, all his myspace correspondence to me is missing. Only mine is there; you won't see what he wrote to me on myspace, i.e. that which I'm responding to in the emails. And I know why; it's because he's embarrassed about certain things he said. He was all happy and appreciative of the "friend" requests he got after meeting me, and he's probably a bit too shy to show that email in particular, not with all those exclamation marks. Also, seeing as he insists we were never "friends", he'd be loathe to produce anything in which he's being all happy and "friendly", calling me things like "bud" and being decidedly friendli-istic. But look at one of the only little pieces of Quo's writing you can see in our myspace correspondence on that page. This is what he says:

Thanks for helping me expose these bastards. You're a star.

Regards

Jim"

Should Crimes of Zion wish to present information extracted from our MySpace interactions, then he is free to do so. He need not seek my permission, or ask that I give my word that he refrain from publishing details of our correspondence on his blog, or any other websites, or share it with Eric Hufschmid. Crimes of Zion can post what he likes, where he likes. I care not. Should Crimes of Zion wish to take screenshots of the messages he received from me, and upload them to a server, as I have done with the messages that he sent me, then he is invited to go straight ahead and do it.

In the absence of 'For Your Eyes Only - Not For Distribution Or Republication' appearing in big, bold letters at the head of any e-mail that I release, the recipient is free to redistribute and republish as he or she pleases. That is how I operate, and all of my genuine friends would already know this. Jamie Linton, however, would not have known this since he was never any friend of mine, nevermind a "good friend" as he has falsely stated on numerous occasions. Jamie Linton was never more than someone with whom I had a brief series of Internet-based interactions.

If Crimes of Zion chooses to continue wasting his time attempting to convince others that I was a "good friend" of his, then that is his business. As I say, I care not. I would be most amused indeed to see our discussions on Israel and 9-11 appear in the public domain, and I would be creased-up with laughter to witness Crimes of Zion make any further attempt to persuade observers of his comments that we had a 'friendship', and that me using the term 'bud' to address him somehow provides concrete, incontrovertible evidence of Jamie Linton being a "good friend" of mine. I could use the laugh. I often refer to other males as 'bud', but only via the Internet. I don't in real-life interactions though. Indeed, I use no American terminology in my everyday, real-life interactions. Why would a proud Scotsman wish to speak like an American? Nae chance Pal....peepil fae Glesga dinnae talk yon wey. Away n bile yer heid ya bampot thit ye urr.

My oh my....George Orwell...eat your heart out. Crimes of Zion has metamorphosed from my "good friend" to my big brother. Here is the full text of the particular MySpace message that Crimes of Zion edited:

Look at the front page of I Am The Witness!!!!

Another Zionist group exposed.

NOLAJBS is a Zionist operation. Over the course of the next few days or so, I will write a report of how this rat's nest was discovered and exposed. I will post a notice when the report is ready to be published on the front page of PlanetQuo.Com.

Thanks for helping me expose these bastards. You're a star.

Regards

Jim

Thank you indeed Jamie Linton! Thank you for helping me expose two of the bastards to whom I refer - yourself and Nina....snicker...snicker...cheers.

Unfortunately for Junkie Linton, he cannot quite make the transition from the drug-crazed Infensus Mentis to the Nina-crazed Crimes of Zion, and is trapped somewhere between two different personas. His reinvention has gone badly wrong. He cannot conceal who and what he really is, try as hard as he may. I simply won't allow it. What Linton has said about NOLAJBS in the past does not sit comfortably at all with the views of his "good friend" associate, and posting-partner - the "wonderful, wonderful" "little girl", the "totally innocent" A Possum Princess.

Crimes of Zion's associate, of whom he speaks so highly, is also a friend and associate of Joe Molero, owner of the NOLAJBS forum. Nina is also a friend and associate of Daryl Bradford Smith - someone who the voice of The French Connection speaks very highly of. Daryl Bradford Smith is inextricably connected to Crimes of Zion via their common friend and associate, Nina. What strange bedfellows. It should now be a tad obvious why Smith did not refer to Nina by name during his broadcast of 2nd June, even though everyone who is clued-up knows that the mystery woman whom Smith dare not mention is Nina.

It was Daryl Bradford Smith who spoke of a "great expose" of NOLAJBS by a guy named PlanetQuo, and it was Daryl Bradford Smith who introduced the NOLAJBS forum to his listeners in the first place. It was on the front page of Daryl Bradford Smith's website that two hyperlinks were placed pointing to my expose of NOLAJBS, and it was Crimes of Zion's "good friend" and associate who contacted Daryl Bradford Smith on behalf of Joe Molero, owner of the NOLAJBS forum, and persuaded Smith to have those two hyperlinks removed from the front page of The French Connection.

Now you know why Crimes of Zion edited the MySpace message that he cites in support of his case, and now you know why I went to the trouble of saving, and taking screenshots of EVERY piece of MySpace correspondence that ever took place between us. The whole shebang - from day one to the day I binned this Zionist clown. Everything. I have a comprehensive record of EVERY single piece of correspondence that he sent. E-mails, MySpace messages, and, of course, the chat logs of our few, irregular and brief MSN messenger conversations.

I have no recorded telephone calls to share because no telephone conversations ever took place between us. My "good friend" Crimes of Zion never asked me for my landline or my mobile telephone number - not that they would ever have been given. My "former ally" didn't even ask to be added to my list SKYPE of contacts. I did, however, ask him if he used SKYPE, but he told me that he had uninstalled the SKYPE software from his laptop. My "good friend" in Jew Central, Perth, Australia wasn't interested in speaking to me yet he calls his other "good friend" in America on his mobile phone. Crimes of Zion's other "good friend" is evidently a "gooder" friend than I supposedly was. It's just as well that I'm not the jealous type.

During his opening attack sequence of 17th May - The Big Green Monster Rears It's Ugly Head - Crimes of Zion decrees that:

"Anyone can see that the driving force behind that video is spite. Could it be that PlanetQuo is jealous of a 22yr old woman's phone relationship with Smith, his longtime idol?"

The answer to the question is, of course, no. Since the root cause of jealousy is low self-esteem, and since I do not hold myself in low self-esteem, I do not experience the emotional dysfunction of jealousy. I did when I was sixteen, but that was a long, long time ago. In any case, I would find it difficult to experience jealousy over someone with whom I had never had any emotional contact. I care not one iota about Nina or Daryl Bradford Smith, and if this wasn't already self-evident, it should be now.

My interest in Nina arose solely as the consequence of her being identified and confirmed as the person who, at the request of Joe Molero exerted influence over Daryl Bradford Smith vis a vis hyperlinks on the front page of his website that led to this page on PlanetQuo.Net. Crimes of Zion knows this, Daryl Bradford Smith knows this, Nina knows this, Joe Molero knows this, I know this, and so too do dozens of of other people. And many more will come to know in the days, weeks and months to come, I assure you.

Crimes of Zion: "Before you admonish me, qrswave, I hear you. It's the last I have to say on the matter."

I leave you with the final two pieces of e-mail correspondence that I received from Eric Hufschmid, webmaster of The French Deception. Hufschmid was correct about the deception becoming more intense as the Zionists become more desperate - Crimes of Zion has demonstrated that point very well, don't you think? Hufschmid was also correct when he said and that "people need to identify the deception themselves." Teach me something I don't already know, Eric. Go tell it to the useful idiots - such as Tom Goy - who you have listed as your GoySpace 'friends.'

Although Hufschmid is correct to state that I have upset Nina - as if I care about how that Ziobitch might feel. Hufschmid is, however, mistaken if he believes that he can avoid being called to account for his involvement in this affair - badly mistaken indeed.

Eric Hufschmid can be absolutely certain of one thing - I can be counted-on to never say that he and and Daryl Bradford Smith are helping me. That is something I will gladly, and publicly give my word on. Consider it written in stone. Helping me? Now where have I heard that line before?

And as for the Brendon man....Hufschmid was once again correct. He most definitely despise me, and he most definitely did "join in" the fray. Brendon O'Connell, however, does not actually exist - except in the vivid imagination of Jamie Linton a.k.a. Crimes of Zion.