Article originally posted on Wake Up From Your Slumber
 
Lying Zionist Whore
 

Daryl's High-Speed Internet Connection
 
And on his last show

He was lying about

A:Being an American citizen

Or

B:lying about living in France.

Where is this Guy talking from? Who knows. He will not use skype BECAUSE it will uncover his nesting spot INSTANTLY. Creditability is something you will never have Mr Sutter.

Oh and i guess the higher highers told him to do the "GET YER SHOT GUNS" thing again. Something to be scared of mr Sutter? Or do you just want a bunch of folks to go out and do some killing in the near future? THis is twice you have spouted Go and Buy a bunch of guns and ammo what is your plan? Why does this human advocate Killings of ANY sort?

First you take D.C. Then you take New York.


Masher1 - Tuesday 29th May, 2007 - 04:13


                         --------------------------------------------------------------


Skype

Ever tried Skype over 56k dialup?

Not so good.


A Possum Princess - Tuesday 29th May, 2007 - 07:00

                                       --------------------------------------------------------------


Skype


Nina,

According to Eric Hufschmid, DBS got high-speed Internet last year. I'm sure that he could find guests who also have high-speed Internet. And of course, Eric has high-speed Internet.


Whippette - Tuesday 29th May, 2007 - 07:23


                         --------------------------------------------------------------


Well, despite what Eric has

Well, despite what Eric has supposedly reported re Daryl's connection, every time i have logged Daryl's visits he has had a different France Telecom IP address. Always geo-located to the same provincial area, but always a different IP (even when multiple visits were recorded just hours apart during the same day, each visit reflected a different IP address.)

In my experience, this is indicative of a dial-up connection or at best ISDN, which is still inadequate for Skype. No broadband provider I've ever seen reassigns dynamic IP's with such frequency. Not to say that Eric lied, rather it's possible that Daryl was mistaken about his connection type?


A Possum Princess - Tuesday 29th May, 2007 - 08:04


                         --------------------------------------------------------------


DBS IP Address

Nina, this was your response to me.

"Well, despite what Eric has supposedly reported re Daryl's connection, every time i have logged Daryl's visits he has had a different France Telecom IP address."
-----------------------------------------
This is my question to you regarding this response.

Logged Daryl's visits? I'm curious! Which website was DBS visiting that allowed you to log his visits? Was this I Am The Witness?


Whippette - Friday 1st June, 2007 - 08:11


                         --------------------------------------------------------------


DBS's ultra dynamic IP

Don't be silly Suzette... how and why would I log his visits to his own site?

I've been logging his bi-weekly visits to my Jdate member page, of course. ;)


A Possum Princess - Friday 1st June, 2007 - 15:27


                         --------------------------------------------------------------


Nina, you didn't answer my question

Nina, you responded to my question regarding Daryl's IP with the following.

"DBS's ultra dynamic IP
Don't be silly Suzette... how and why would I log his visits to his own site?

I've been logging his bi-weekly visits to my Jdate member page, of course. ;)"
-----------------------------------------

You're the one who is being inane Nina. You made a statement wherein you said that every time you have "logged Daryl's visits he has had a different France Telecom IP address,"and I asked you if the website where you logged Daryl's visits was I Am The Witness. You responded with one of your "silly jokes". I do of course assume that you were actually joking about being Jewish.

I ask you a straightforward question to which you respond with a question. You ask how and why you would log his visits to his own site. I Am The Witness is not Daryl's site. It is Eric Hufschmid's. Hufschmid is the webmaster, not Smith, but you already know this. The following quotation is lifted from the series of e-mails that flew back and forth between you and Infensus Mentis a.k.a. Crimes of Zion a few months ago.....

"I spoke with Daryl directly about the NOLA shit and he said he couldnt remove it because he really has little to do with the website and "frankly, I wouldnt know how to change it or even access my site." [snicker snicker] So after much arguing I got him to "have Eric remove the links". (Mind you, this is before I'd realized that NOLA was probably in on the charade as well.)"

So let's dispense with the 'I Am The Witness is Daryl's website' crap please.

You've didn't answer my question, so I'll ask it again.....

Which website was DBS visiting that allowed you to log his visits?

For you to log DBS' visits to a website, you would need to be in control of that website or at the very least have admin powers. So Nina, what website did Daryl visit with such regularity?


Whippette - Friday 1st June, 2007 - 22:46


                         --------------------------------------------------------------


No

Perhaps you don't have even a cursory understanding of IP logging/visitor tracking, etc.

I cannot track visits to any site that I do not have admin privileges for. I do not, nor have I ever had such access to iamthewitness or any other site not owned by me... (unlike yourself, I might add, Suzette!) Furthermore, I would have no interest in tracking visits to any site other than my own.

To recap, I only monitor visits to sites I administer for myself. In other words, I only track the IP's of visitors to my own sites.

Can you deduce the rest?


A Possum Princess - Saturday 2nd June, 2007 - 03:40


                         --------------------------------------------------------------


N/A

As to the URL of my site... if that's what you are asking for..

..I don't believe that it is any of your business, Suzette.

Perhaps if you were to ask politely, rather than demand... and if you were to explain how it is in any way germane to you or your business, I would consider sharing it with you.


A Possum Princess - Saturday 2nd June, 2007 - 03:47


                         --------------------------------------------------------------


Nina, either you or Eric is mistaken re: Daryl's IP

To recap, DBS claims that he won't use SKYPE because it "doesn't network the way they want."

You say that SKYPE will not work properly because DBS connects to the Internet via a 56k dialup connection. What you claim completely contradicts what Eric Hufschmid has told me. According to Daryl's webmaster, DBS has been using a high-speed broadband connection since last year. In this case, the reason that you have given for Daryl not using SKYPE is incorrect and invalid.

Eric is better-placed to understand the technicalities of his partner's Internet connection than are you. Eric states that DBS uses a high-speed broadband connection, you state that he uses a 56k dial-up. One of you is badly mistaken, and unless you are privy to information regarding DBS that his partner and webmaster is not, it is you who is more likely to have erred.

It is you Nina who is suggesting that DBS is unable to use SKYPE because he does not have a fast-enough Internet connection, and since it is you who is disputing the accuracy of Eric Hufschmid's information, the onus lies with you to back-up your claim with hard evidence. You have already stated that you have such evidence, and all I am doing is asking you to produce it. Share with us the visitor logs that you say you have access to. Show us proof that DBS uses multiple IP addresses. Show that you are correct and Hufschmid wrong. Prove it.

You stated that you "only monitor visits to sites" that you administer for yourself then you speak of the URL of your site. You mention "sites" as in plural then you speak of "site" as in singular. You either have a site, or you have multiple sites. Which is the case? Why won't you state for the record the particular websites where you have administration privileges. Why won't you tell us the name(s) of the site(s)? Why won't you allow all other interested parties access to the information on the site(s) that you claim DBS visits on a regular basis? Why all the secrecy?

The website(s) you own and operate is not only a matter of interest to me, but also to everyone who has an interest in this thread. The title of this thread is 'Eric Hufschmid's charge unfounded', and if what you are saying with regard to the speed of DBS' Internet connection is true, then what Eric told me is obviously untrue. If this is so, we have yet another false statement from Eric. If you continue to insist that DBS is on a 56k dial-up then by default you imply that Hufschmid is lying. You can't have it both ways Nina. So which of you is telling the truth, and which of you is lying?


Whippette - Saturday 2nd June, 2007 - 23:51

                         --------------------------------------------------------------


fin

Suzette,

I would never publicly disclose anyone's IP address(es)... not even yours.

I would also never disclose any piece of information to you privately, for any reason.

As to my site(s), I have no interest in you visiting it/them whatsoever.

I have no admin privileges on any site(s) other than my own and I share such privileges with no one.

Regarding my relationship with Daryl, there is nothing further I wish to share with you.

In fact, I have nothing else to say to you, Suzette. Period.


A Possum Princess - Saturday 2nd June, 2007 - 06:06


                         --------------------------------------------------------------

Well I do

Jesus you're bland old hag, Suzette. I swear you're either related to Dr Spock, or you're a computer program.

If you continue to insist that DBS is on a 56k dial-up then by default you imply that Hufschmid is lying. You can't have it both ways Nina. So which of you is telling the truth, and which of you is lying?

She didn't "insist" on anything. What I remember her doing is making a suggestion based on an observation. You're about as cluey as PlanetClouseau P.I, you silly old dork.


Crimes of Zion - Saturday 2nd June, 2007 - 08:01

                         --------------------------------------------------------------


The Last Word


"I would never publicly disclose anyone's IP address(es)... not even yours."

Not even if the individual whose IP addresses you are being asked to disclose was someone who you believe may be a "Zionist operative" because the behavior that individual showed towards you employs "every known Zionist manipulation tactic" that a "Zionist operator" would use? Tactics such as those mentioned by Crimes of Zion perhaps?

An individual whose behavior had, you told Crimes of Zion on April 25, 2007, "recently freaked me out", an individual who you had already denounced as a "fucking scumbag liar," someone who you recommend everyone else to treat with "extreme caution and skepticism", not even someone who is on your Zionist watch-list?

The particular individual in question is Daryl Bradford Smith, and it was this individual, and this individual only, whose IP addresses I asked you to make public. You chose not to, so, we'll conclude the 56k dial-up versus the high-speed broadband debate here then, shall we? You have failed to convince me that Daryl and Eric both got it wrong about how Daryl connects to the Internet, and that you got it right. Daryl can use, and does use, SKYPE.

"I would also never disclose any piece of information to you privately, for any reason."

Nor I to you.....not that I would ever ask. You disclosed Daryl's landline telephone number to Joe Molero, the owner of NOLAJBS, and that alone is good enough reason for me not to trust you at all.

"As to my site(s), I have no interest in you visiting it/them whatsoever."

I never said that I had any interest in visiting your website(s). My sole interest in your website(s) lies exclusively in learning what particular material you have posted on your website(s) that would attract such regular visits from Daryl Bradford Smith using a 56k dial-up connection.

"I have no admin privileges on any site(s) other than my own and I share such privileges with no one."

Thank you for confirming that you, and you alone, are solely responsible for all the material that is to be found posted on your website(s).

"Regarding my relationship with Daryl, there is nothing further I wish to share with you."

Okay Nina, I'm happy to conclude here. I'll let Daryl have the last word about the relationship you and him have.

"In fact, I have nothing else to say to you, Suzette. Period."

Nor I to you. G'day Possum.

"Jesus you're bland old hag, Suzette. I swear you're either related to Dr Spock, or you're a computer program."

You don't appeal to me either Mr. Lintbottom. I much prefer refined, articulate, interesting, handsome men to Coprolalic, scruffy, voyeuristic boys.

To borrow the words of your "good friend"......I have nothing else to say to you, James Linton. Period.

G'day sport.

"Do they really think that they are so high and mighty that they can’t answer a few questions? They want answers about everyone else, but they won’t answer a few questions themselves? Did they really think people wouldn’t start asking questions about them?"

Duped's comments are as applicable to Nina and her knight in shining armor as they are to Smith and Hufschmid.


Whippette - Sunday 3rd June, 2007 - 10:51


                         --------------------------------------------------------------


Title

That hitpiece on me is lame. It hinges entirely on me being Donnie Darko, True Believer, Fester, Quo Vadius, and Brendan O'Connell, who I'm obviously not. And he knows this. Let me tell you why.

1. He has both O'Connell and my home addresses. They're different.

2. He has both our IP's, and they're different.

3. He has both our landline numbers, and they're different. And no, I didn't lie when I said I don't have a landline, because I don't. Not a landline telephone, only a mobile. They activated my landline account when I set up my internet account. You can ring it all day long, you'll only get whatever tone comes through when there's no phone on the end of it.

4. Brendon O'Connell reported me to the cops, and provided evidence of it by way of a link to a screenshot of the letter he got back from them, or the Ombudsman, whatever. I think it's pretty obvious that I'm not interested in reporting myself to the police, even for the sake of playing mindfuck games with Quo's head.

5. It's just obvious. He knows I'm not DD or QV or Fester, because we're totally different with regard to both our writing styles and our position on Smith and just about everything else. That's why you'll see no attempt at trying to prove it in the hitpiece. He just says it's so, and expects you to believe it.

Well it isn't the case. So is Quo a liar, or just stupid? I don't believe it's the latter, so I'll stick with what I've said all along, which is that he's a liar. I've got a webcam right here to comfort anyone I care enough about, if they're stupid enough to fall for any of it. I'm James Linton; one address, one "phone" number, one physical body, and one IP address, and I'm not in the habit of reporting myself to the authoritahs.

One thing you might notice in the hitpiece is that I stated my house number to be a two digit number. That's not true, there's three digits to it (as PlanetClouseau P.I has been kind enough to plaster all over his site for you). The reason for that, is because I didn't want anyone to know my address. Pretty understandable, I would've thought. But Quo asserts that because I'm actually Donnie Darko, I revealed my own address, which I then had to (as Infensus Mentis) refute, by saying that it only had two digits, not three, and therefore must be wrong. If you believe Quo, I had a very long, stupid argument with myself on the NOLAJBS forum, for no good reason, and reported myself to the police therein. It doesn't make sense, because it's bullshit. And very obvious bullshit, at that.

You might also notice that although Quo has stated on this forum that he published "the whole she-bang" with regard to our email correspondence, all his myspace correspondence to me is missing. Only mine is there; you won't see what he wrote to me on myspace, i.e. that which I'm responding to in the emails. And I know why; it's because he's embarrassed about certain things he said. He was all happy and appreciative of the "friend" requests he got after meeting me, and he's probably a bit too shy to show that email in particular, not with all those exclamation marks. Also, seeing as he insists we were never "friends", he'd be loathe to produce anything in which he's being all happy and "friendly", calling me things like "bud" and being decidedly friendli-istic. But look at one of the only little pieces of Quo's writing you can see in our myspace correspondence on that page. This is what he says:

Thanks for helping me expose these bastards. You're a star.

Regards

Jim

I guess he let that through because it wasn't as sucky and as "friendy" as the rest.

Before you admonish me, qrswave, I hear you. It's the last I have to say on the matter.


Crimes of Zion - Sunday 2nd June, 2007 - 12:12


                         --------------------------------------------------------------


Link to the letter

Yeah, that's it. Suzette (but I suspect Quo wrote that last comment) provided the link herself. It's the letter I just mentioned that O'Connell got back from the police after reporting me. But supposedly, I reported myself.


Crimes of Zion - Sunday 2nd June, 2007 - 12:40


                         --------------------------------------------------------------

fingerpuppets

Snakes alive! PlanetQuo and Whippette are one and the same!!

What an attractive sock puppet couple..

In light of this new revelation, especially entertaining was reading about the kind of boys PlanetQuo is into these days... ones that carry pocket Thesauruses, no doubt.


A Possum Princess - Sunday 3rd June, 2007 - 13:45

                         --------------------------------------------------------------

Crunchtime for PlanetQuo

The time has come to settle this shit once and for all, you lying little fuck.

Qrswave and others have, understandably, requested that we take our beef away from WUFYS, where important work is being done. I agree, so let's do it. Choose a forum, and let's see who and who is not serious about their dedication to the Truth. Let's see who's been lying, deceiving, and bullshitting. Let's see, once and for all, who the liar is.

This is the hitpiece in which Jim Kerr aka PlanetQuo has asserted that I'm Brendon O'Connell and all his aliases. He knows I'm not O'Connell, which I've made very clear, as you'll soon discover. O'Connell is my enemy, and always will be. O'Connell is a fucking idiot and a fraud, just like Kerr. Kerr is full of shit, and being that he's used his website to make a permanent record of his lies, which happen to show up as the fourth listing upon googling "crimes of zion", I've been forced to take time out to set the record straight. Each and every lie in the hitpiece has been debunked here.

That's two solid days of work and research which I would've much rather have spent in the fight against Zionism (which is not to say that I haven't been doing just that), which might explain why I haven't posted any blog material here lately. But it was a necessary endeavor; ask yourself how you'd handle your affairs if a hitpiece of that nature, full of outright lies and deception, were to be put out about you.

You picked the wrong Jamie Linton to fuck with, Kerr.

I haven't "pinged" it at technorati yet, or made arrangements for it to show up in a google search. But if we can't settle this bullshit in the due course of time, it won't be long before planetquo.blogspot.com is the third or fourth listing under "planetquo" on google, just like your hitpiece on me is, under "crimes of zion". I've also taken the liberty of covering my arse in numerous other ways which will not be disclosed at this point, as insurance against any further attacks on my name and reputation.

I've debunked all the claims Kerr has made in his hitpiece on me at

http://planetquo.blogspot.com/

The fact of the matter is, the Truth is on my side. I'm not Brendon O'Connell, or anyone else I haven't claimed to be, and I won't sit by idly while lies to that effect are plastered all over the net. I'm not standing for this shit any longer. I have the evidence; he has nothing but lies and spin. I'm armed with the Truth; he's full of shit and armless. It's a one-armed man against a one-man army.

So let's do it. Let's bring this to a head, PlanetSmear.

See you at sundown, pardner.

The truth, in correct order:

http://planetquo.blogspot.com/2007/06/truth-of-matter.html
http://planetquo.blogspot.com/2007/06/background.html
http://planetquo.blogspot.com/2007/06/planetclouseau-pi-idiot-savant.htm...


Crimes of Zion - Thursday 7th June, 2007 - 15:40


                         --------------------------------------------------------------


Copralalia with a capital 'C'

Just one last thing, by the way, before WUFYS sees no more of this folly.

Scroll up if you will, and check out Suzette's last post. Therein was stated

"You don't appeal to me either Mr Lintbottom. I much prefer refined, articulate, interesting, handsome men to Coprolalic, scruffy, voyeuristic boys."

Imagine my complete lack of surprise to see the exact same word, capitalised and all, on PlanetKerr's hitpiece page on me. He states on it

"...but it is now the turn of my duplicitous, deceiving, Coprolalic, adversary to face trial by jury."

What a coinky-dink, eh? Looks like Kerr the copralalic (which needn't begin with a capital 'c' in the middle of a sentence) hypocrite is the only one demonstrably posting on forums under false names. Note also that "bottom" is an English colloquialism for 'ass' or 'arse' - rarely if ever used by Americans. If Suzette wants to tell me I have lint in my arse-crack, it's kinda strange that she's using Kerr's English vernacular to tell me so.

"You don't appeal to me either Mr Lintbottom"

So either Quo is posting as Suzette, or Suzette has so little wit of her own that she's had to consult the similarly witless Jim Kerr aka PlanetQuo before responding to me in her post. Either way, it's yet another case of the kind of deceit we've come to expect from the Q/S/M trio.

No wonder all I got was silence when I called it a few posts ago.

Yeah, that's it. Suzette (but I suspect Quo wrote that last comment) provided the link herself.

I wonder who feels more embarrassed right now, Sooz or the pee queue.

Visit

http://planetquo.blogspot.com/

for the "trial by jury".


Crimes of Zion - Thursday 7th June, 2007 - 15:40


                         --------------------------------------------------------------