This page contains exact reproductions of the comments posted by myself and Crimes of Zion on the Daryl Bradford Smith Indicted blog entry on Wake Up From Your Slumber between 16th-17th May, 2007. My comments on Crimes of Zion's comments have been interpolated in bold text.

What you are about to read is the opening sequence of personal attacks that Crimes of Zion initiated. This was his declaration of war. This is how it all began. Crimes of Zion's version of events can be studied here. I am more than content to let the evidence do the talking, and I will leave it to you, dear reader, to discern which of us telling the truth, and which of us is lying.

I have now all but completed the process of addressing the lies and deception that Crimes of Zion has subjected me to over the course of the past six weeks. This page offers interested parties an overview of why and how Crimes of Zion declared war on PlanetQuo, and should be read in conjunction with the following pages:

James Linton a.k.a. Crimes of Zion a.k.a. Infensus Mentis

Crimes of Zion Exposed

Crimes Of Zion Stripped Bare

Other related pages can be accessed via the drop-down menu below.

State of Denial

PlanetQuo - Wednesday, 16th May - 10:18

"Eric Hufschmid is the King of the Zionist Deniers"

I disagree. Alex Jones is the King of Kings when it comes to Zionist denial.

I was amused when I heard Daryl Bradford Smith say that he believes you to be Scott Makufka a.k.a. Victor Thorn. I reckon that you're Debus posting under another pseudonym, but I bet you'll deny it - just like Nina a.k.a. A Possum Princess from NOLAJBS denies that she knows Madthumbs. Nina, incidentally is the girl who likes to pose for the camera while wearing an IDF T-shirt.

I doubt though if she's told Daryl Bradford Smith of her support for the Israel Defence Forces during their telephone conversations. I'm sure he'll find out soon enough though. In fact, I know he will. Daryl has been keeping some bad company....tsk tsk. Shame be upon him.

You're keeping very bad company too Poseidon. A self-confessed Jewish shill and a participant in an IDF summer camp is not the kind of company such a fine researcher and writer as your good self should be mingling with. One does tend to be judged by the company that one keeps, you know.

PlanetQuo Liar or Just Stupid

Crimes of Zion - 17th May - 00:59

Jim Kerr of planetquo.com, the great forum-stalking exposer-guy, is either an outright liar or straight up delusional.

While it rather unkind for Crimes of Zion to attempt to discredit me by labelling me a 'forum stalker', it is however, most generous of him to accredit me as being "great." Thank you kindly Mr. Linton - perhaps one day I will be a celebrity like you. It amuses me to see a celebrity MySpacer attempt to re-invent himself as an 'anti-Zionist', come to Wake Up From Your Slumber and proclaim his new-found 'anti-Zionist' 'credentials' on the back of a hastily-assembled, newly-created cut-and-paste Google blogspot, and then tell me that I'm experiencing delusions of grandeur. As for being an "outright liar", I will leave it to you, dear reader, to examine his constantly-edited body of 'evidence', compare it with the evidence that I present here and elsewhere, and to draw your own conclusions as to which of us is not telling the truth.

I was friends with Jimbo until just recently, when he accused me of spreading disinformation via my myspace profile, because he doesn't approve of some of the sites I link to.

James Linton contacted me in January 2007 requesting that he be added to my list of MySpace contacts. This is the first comment that he posted on my profile. The link that was posted ultimately leads to this article by Rabbi Gedalya Liebermann, in which the Rabbi tells us that the Jews were ".....given the Holy Land by G-d in order to be able to study and practice the Torah without disturbance and to attain levels of holiness difficult to attain outside of the Holy Land" and that ".....more than six million holy people had to experience as punishment for the Zionist stupidity. The Holocaust, he wept, was a direct result of Zionism, a punishment from G-d."

After having initiated contact, Crimes Of Zion's first act was to promote via MY profile a deceptive website which publishes articles written by Rabbis proclaiming that the Jews are God's chosen people, and that God ordered six million of them exterminated as retribution for "Zionist stupidity"  - just one reason why Crimes Of Zion was flagged as a disinformationalist and possible enemy infiltrator in the early stages of our 'friendship.'

According to Jim, if you link to 9/11 sites that don't vociferously declare that Israel was behind the attacks, you're a disinfo agent.

This is Crime of Zion's decree - not mine. My position is that one has to be consistent if one's proclamation of one's anti-Zionist credentials is to be credible, and Crimes of Zion's only consistency is his inconsitency. He promotes numerous 9-11 websites that make no reference to Israel's role in the 9-11 attacks and attempt to shift blame away from Israel. Prison Planet and Infowars are but two such sites. And while Crimes of Zion does make vociferous statements, these vociferous declarations are not to the effect of 9-11 being an Israeli operation. On the contrary, the new kid on the block is confused as to which type of job 9-11 was. He informs us that 9-11 was an 'Israeli operation' but also vociferously proclaims 9-11 to be an 'inside-out job' and an 'inside job' too. As Crimes of Zion himself admits, he just doesn't understand it. Crimes of Zion makes John Kerry appear decisive.

And while I am more convinced of Crimes of Zion's disinformationalist credentials than I am of his 'anti-Zionist' claims, I am, however, not the only person who has issues with the quality and accuracy of the information that Crimes of Zion peddles.

His penchant for unwarranted finger-pointing and gratuitous accusations is second only to that of Eric Hufschmid.

I suppose that Crimes of Zion will also consider it "unwarranted" for me to draw attention to the fact that he lives in a suburb of the western-Australian city of Perth named Mount Lawley which is, according to the University of Sydney, where many of the city's Jewish community are resident. Indeed, of the 6,000 Jews that live in Perth, many of them are to be found in the Mount Lawley area, which means that there is a high probability of Crimes of Zion being a Jew. And given the gratuitous accusations that he has made both on Wake Up From Your Slumber and on the recently-created and much-edited Google blogspot that he created using my handle as the URL, I will repay Crimes of Zion in kind by accusing him of not only being a Jew, but of being a Zionist Jew.

Shalom, Jacob Lintonwitz.

Hmmmmm......I wonder if Hufschmid can top that......well......my oh my......he already has!!!

I didn't really give a shit when the finger started pointing at me, but now that the stupid old cunt's started posting lies about my friend Nina on his rapidly-declining-in-relevance website and on this thread, the time's come to do some "exposing" of my own.

So then, we have already arrived at the nitty-gritty of why Crimes of Zion came to Wake Up From Your Slumber on 16th May and launched this trilogy of vitriolic, abusive, personal attacks on me the very next day. This war he has declared is not about him, it's about Nina. I will address Nina a.k.a. A Possum Princess a.k.a. Shiksaleh a.k.a. the psychologically-unhinged Eireann Goddess - and God knows who else - later. For the moment though, I will address the assertion that Crimes of Zion makes in regard of my "rapidly-declining-in-relevance website." And by the way peasant, it's Mr. Cunt to you - you uncouth, coprolaliac, whippersnapper. Didn't your Mama teach you to show respect for your elders? I am your elder, Mr. Zion, and more learned than you, so kindly stick to the protocols please.

The number of unique visitors that PlanetQuo.Com and PlanetQuo.Net receives each month does not indicate that either of my websites are "rapidly-declining-in-relevance" as Crimes of Zion  falsely states. Compare what Crimes of Zion says nowadays with what he was saying when he first initiated contact with me. As I say, Crimes of Zion's only consistency is his inconsistentcy.

PlanetQuo: I was amused when I heard Daryl Bradford Smith say that he believes you to be Scott Makufka a.k.a. Victor Thorn. I reckon that you're Debus posting under another pseudonym, but I bet you'll deny it - just like Nina a.k.a. A Possum Princess from NOLAJBS denies that she knows Madthumbs. Nina, incidentally is the girl who likes to pose for the camera while wearing an IDF T-shirt.

I doubt though if she's told Daryl Bradford Smith of her support for the Israel Defence Forces during their telephone conversations. I'm sure he'll find out soon enough though. In fact, I know he will. Daryl has been keeping some bad company....tsk tsk. Shame be upon him.

You're keeping very bad company too Poseidon. A self-confessed Jewish shill and a participant in an IDF summer camp is not the kind of company such a fine researcher and writer as your good self should be mingling with. One does tend to be judged by the company that one keeps, you know.

Jim aka PlanetQuo would have you all believe that Nina, my 22yr old friend currently residing in New York, "attended an IDF summer camp". Here are some quotes from Jim's ridiculous too-much-time-on-his-hand doesn't-get-out-enough Nina expose:

"Why is Daryl Bradford Smith having regular telephone conversations with a 22-year old woman who states that she attended an IDF summer camp?"

"Daryl Bradford Smith urgently needs to explain his relationship with the young woman who likes to be photographed wearing IDF T-shirts and dining on pages of the Talmud. How did Smith become acquainted with a supporter of the Israel Defence Forces in the first place?"

What Jim's referring to is a photo that Nina herself posted on a thread in the NOLAJBS forum. The caption was

"Oh, so it IS okay for me to share my experience in IDF summer camp? I'm grateful that this forum provides such a hospitable warm environment to come clean. Thanks...."

It was in response to this post, from an idiot going by the name of Quo Vadius, aka Donnie Darko:

"My sister went to Israel. Worked on a Kibbutz. I should have killed her on her return.

My friend has barbecues with a former Israeli fighter pilot. I should assassinate him immediately.

I walked past a Jewish guy once. I should have vomited and washed myself with acid immediately.

Your amazing logic is noted.

See your psychiatrist."

Can anyone besides the delusional Jim Kerr not see that it was a joke? Or is Jim not delusional at all, but trying to deliberately mislead the readers of his painfully boring and inane "expose"? One thing's for sure; either Jimbo's incredibly fucking dumb, or he's a bullshit artist.

Oh yes, of course, it was just another of Nina's hilarious 'jokes'. Every time Nina is asked to account for her actions all we hear from her and Crimes of Zion is that was a 'joke'. This must be the 'wit' that Daryl Bradford Smith speaks of. I see nothing amusing in someone who purports themselves to be an anti-Zionist being photographed in public wearing a t-shirt that bears the logo of the IDF while inanely grinning like a demented Cheshire cat. On the contrary, I consider such actions to be damaging to the anti-Zionist cause. Ask yourself whether Nina's inane 'jokes' help us, or whether they hinder us.

Perhaps Crimes of Zion and his comedienne friend might consider sending a copy of the photograph of Nina in her IDF t-shirt to Rachel Corrie's parents to see if they find Nina's 'joke' funny.

Oh, and Poseidon is Debus, too, according to Jim. Who else besides Jimbo believes that?

Since my initial suspicion of Poseidon was based on the similarities between he and Debus, and since  Crimes of Zion told me on April 24th that I was "right" and that "there are similarities between Debus and Poseidon", Crimes of Zion evidently did not dismiss my theory when it was first put to him. Indeed, Crimes of Zion contacted me the following day to give me an example of "how full of shit Poseidon can be."

Anyway, all that aside, I happen to have proof that Jim aka PlanetQuo is a lowlife liar, even if he is stupid. A couple of weeks ago I offered Jim some information about Daryl Bradford Smith that I'd obtained through email correspondence with Nina, on the condition that he keep it to himself. After getting Nina's permission to pass on the info, I wrote to Jim thusly (excerpt from an email):

"I have a fair bit of information from Nina that I'll pass on to you if you can assure me that it will be used for your interest only. No publishing on your site, no sharing with Hufschmid, no fucking around. I don't want her to be seen to be weighing in on it, especially via me."

This is the first paragraph of his response, excerpted from his rather lengthy reply:

From: planetquo@hotmail.co.uk
Sent: Wednesday, 25 April 2007 6:36:23 AM
To: jamie linton (jmzlinton@hotmail.com)

Hi Jamie,

I give you my word that any information that you give me regarding Nina aka 'A Possum Princess' will not be published on any of my websites or shared with Eric Hufschmid. Nina is under investigation. I am interested solely in her relationships with Daryl Bradford Smith and Joe Molero and Madthumbs.

Although I am the holder of a second-class honours degree, Crimes of Zion believes that I am "dumb" and that I am "stupid." I was, however, smart enough not to give him my word that I would retain the information that he volunteered for my exclusive use only. As can be seen from the segment of the e-mail Crimes of Zion reproduces above, my exact words were:

"I give you my word that any information that you give me regarding Nina aka 'A Possum Princess' will not be published on any of my websites or shared with Eric Hufschmid."

That was the deal I signed-up to, and on which I have kept my word. None of the information that Crimes of Zion volunteered was published on any of my websites or passed to Eric Hufschmid. It was only after Crimes of Zion had joined Wake Up From Your Slumber on 16th May and declared war on me the following day that I published every single piece of information that he gave me along with every piece of e-mail correspondence he sent during the sixteen week period that he was on my contact list. Had I given Crimes of Zion my word that I would use the information he supplied only for my own interest, then he might have a case, but since I did not give him my word in this respect, he has no case. Yet it is upon this very point that his contention of me being "a liar" hinges. This, dear reader, is the "conclusive evidence" with which he has attempted to destroy me. This is his justification for the vicious, personal abuse that he has subjected me and friends to for six weeks. This is the pretext that Crimes of Zion used to declare war on PlanetQuo.

Suzette was given all the information that Crimes of Zion supplied, but since I did not give Crimes of Zion my specific word that I would not disclose this information to Suzette, he therefore has no grounds for complaint. The guy who reckons me to be "dumb" and "stupid" was outsmarted and outmaneouvered, and doesn't he know it. As I stated earlier, Crimes of Zion was already under suspicion of being an enemy infiltrator, and his subsequent actions have served only to confirm that I was right about him all along. I knew he and Nina were attempting to entrap me, and I  played along with it. It's as simple as that. I was dealing with an enemy masquerading as a 'friend'.

Suzette challenged Nina on the NOLAJBS forum on 4th May, and Nina was forced to admit that A Possum Princess is indeed another of the multiple psudonyms that she operates under, and that, dear reader, is the sequence of events that led to Crimes of Zion declaring war two weeks later.

I trusted Jim, I had no reason not to.

Alas, I was unable to reciprocate Crimes of Zion's 'trust' since I am not in the habiting of trusting my enemies. I prefer to allow them to delude themselves that they are my 'friend', and keep them close so that they can be observed, studied and monitored. One will learn so much more about one's enemies by observing them at close quarters than from afar.

I considered him a good friend and a man of his word.

True. Jamie Linton did consider me to be his "good friend." So too did his alter-ego Brendan O'Connell, but I never considered Crimes of Zion to be my "good friend" though. Indeed, I didn't even bother to ask his name - he told me that he was called Jamie a month after he had initiated contact. Should Crimes of Zion or anyone else doubt that I am indeed a man of word, then all they need do is ask any of my good friends.

So I forwarded an email I'd received from Nina to him, unedited and in full.

For which I am most grateful. Thank you kindly young man. Idiot.

What a mistake that was.

Indeed so - Crimes of Zion should not have got involved in my investigation of Nina. His biggest mistake, however, was declaring war on me - as he is already beginning to realise.

Another mistake that Crimes of Zion made was to get caught lying about when I asked him if he would be agreeable to me confronting Daryl Bradford Smith about his relationship with Nina on the back of not only the information that Nina relayed to me via Crimes of Zion, but also with what I had already gleaned from other sources. Crimes of Zion claims that in the next e-mail correspondence he received from me,  that I sought his permission for Smith to be informed of what Nina had been telling Crimes of Zion. This is a lie, and a demonstrable lie at that.

In the next email he sent me, he asked my permission to show Daryl Bradford Smith the email:

All one need do to see that Crimes of Zion lied, is to peruse the sequence of e-mail correspondence between Crimes of Zion and myself. The segment of the e-mail that Crimes of Zion cites below was sent to him at 10:20:33 PM GMT on Tuesday 1st May, and this is what he claims to be the next piece of correspondence that he received from me following my e-mail of 25th April.

"Smith needs to explain himself and answer the questions that I will be asking him. If he is clean, he has nothing to hide. In view of this, will you give me permission to reveal the information without naming my source. Smith does not need to know where my information came from. All he needs to know is what Nina has said. He will know whether or not she is telling the truth."

In actuality, Crimes of Zion received a total of FIVE SEPARATE EMAILS in the period in-between. Go see for yourself. Crimes of Zion is the one who is delusional, dumb and stupid if he believes he can spout such easily-detectable lies and expect to get away with it.

So he was already looking to break the deal, but at least it was looking like I had a choice in the matter. So I asked Nina in a myspace message:

----------------- Original Message -----------------
From: Infensus Mentis
Date: May 2, 2007 12:01 AM

Nina - Quo is asking for my permission to share some of the info (whatever it may be that he's interested in, I don't know) with Daryl, yay or nay?

Crimes of Zion 'forgot' to include the remainder of this particular piece of correspondence:

"She seems to think you've already spilt the beans."

And from her, I got this reply:

From: Nina
Date: 01 May 2007, 10:15 PM

oh? HAha im pretty sure some such discussions have already taken place.... ;) why he's asking permission now, i'm not sure. (btw, if you'd rather not serve as courier, you can let planetquo know that he is welcome to contact me directly. i'm certain you've got more important and interesting things to attend to.)

cheers, Nina"

Crimes of Zion leaps from 25th April to 2nd May, omitting a week's worth of correspondence in the process, and the statements that Nina made to Crimes of Zion on 25th April tell us why he omitted the inconvenient parts:

"I thought about this and really, it shouldn't be a problem. You can tell whomever whatever you wish."

and that Crimes of Zion was free to:

"divulge whatever you wish"

This is what Crimes of Zion himself had to say on 25th April:

"Yip, she knows you've received the email material I gave you. But no, it was all written before I asked her permission to pass it on. So don't think it as written for you - it was written for me - possibly with the knowledge that it would get to you."

Crimes of Zion is claiming that he asked Nina's permission on 2nd May, but since Nina had already had granted him permission EIGHT DAYS BEFORE there was no need whatsoever for him to repeat his request on 1st May. Go figure. In any case, it was on 29th April that I first suggested to Crimes of Zion that:

"Nina seems keen on giving you information to pass to me - too keen. I smell a rat. She WANTS me to know. Why so, do you think? The only way that her information can be verified is for me to pass it on to DBS and invite him to comment. Would you be agreeable to this?"

To which Crimes of Zion replied with on Tuesday 1st May:

"Wait, Quo - are you asking me if you can give info to DBS without telling him it's from Nina? Because if you are, that's fine. I thought by "the source" you meant me. If you meant that you'll pass on info without telling him it's from Nina, cool. But if you want to tell him that it comes from her, let me get permission."

To which I replied the following day:

"To clear up any confusion, what I'm proposing is this:
 
I furbish Smith with all the information that you have furbished me with, and in the exact same format as I received it (minus, of course, your comments!). As we both have e-mail copies of the information, you would be able to ascertain that I do not edit any of what you sent me. You would receive a copy of the e-mail that I send to Smith to verify that the information sent is exactly the same as the information received from you.
 
I tell him only that I acquired the information via a MySpace contact who is mutual to both Nina and myself. I offer Smith the opportunity to comment on the information. If he asks me to confirm sources, I would tell him that I must obtain their permission."

So it seemed he'd already spilled his guts. Unimpressed, I emailed him with the above quote from from Nina, with "it looks like you've already spilled the beans" at the bottom.

Yet another demonstrable lie. The e-mail that Crimes of Zion sent to me with Crime of Zion's "She seems to think you've already spilt the beans" statement at the foot was sent on Tuesday 2nd May. Crimes of Zion next e-mail was sent two days later on Thursday 4th May:

"Jim, what's goin' on you old weirdo? I didn't get another email after the one below.

It was at that point that he became hostile, deleted me from myspace, and accused me of being disinfo on account of the links to "deceptive sites" on my myspace profile. Conspicuously absent was any sort of denial about his "spilling the beans" and breaking his word. An excerpt from my reply:

My last email to you was "looks like you've spilled the beans", and now I get this. Not a direct answer, but this. And don't you fucking pretend that our deal was for you not to share it VERBATIM; the deal was for you not to share it at all, you conniving bastard. I believe my words were "for your interest only". But you broke that word, didn't you. So that you could run over to Daryl and be the hero that saves him from Nina, the 22 year old girl that you're making an arch-nemesis out of in your silly fucking doesn't-get-out-enough imagination.

As can be seen from my final e-mail to Crimes of Zion, I spoke in an assertive tone, but was not hostile. Indeed, I explained in detail why I no longer wished my websites to be linked with Crime of Zion's MySpace profile and requested that he remove all links to PlanetQuo. Crimes of Zion responded with two further e-mails both of which were abusive and written in his usual expletive style. In his final e-mail, Crimes of Zion made me smile when he said that I "broke my word" so that I "could run over to Daryl and be the hero that saves him from Nina, the 22 year old girl"; that I am "mindlessly" "in lockstep" with The French Connection; and that my "loyalty to them" is "cult-like."

And this, dear reader, adequately demonstrates just how little Crimes of Zion actually knew at the time. He had no idea whatsoever that I was planning to expose not only Nina, but also Daryl Bradford Smith. All my close friends did though. Go figure.

The last thing that I heard from Crimes of Zion via e-mail was in respect of the holocaust comment that he posted on my GoySpace profile on the same day that he was added to my contact list:

"I left you that link for your interest, Jim. I don't believe the holocaust was a "holocaust" either. But now you're ranting and raving and bla bla bla, I can't even be bothered finishing this shit."

Yes. How convenient, Crimes of Zion is taken to task for posting links to a deceptive article written by a Rabbi, and all he can say in his defence is that I am "ranting and raving" and "bla bla bla."

The final sentence of the final paragraph of the final e-mail that Crimes of Zion sent me is most amusing indeed: "Scurry off and "expose" me then, I couldn't give a fuck." Well, for someone who "couldn't give a fuck", Crimes of Zion sure is giving a fuck - pity he isn't getting one though.

Shortly thereafter, Nina's information, the email I'd given to Jim on trust, was posted verbatim in a thread on the NOLAJBS forum by Jim's new partner in crime, Suzette the Whipette. So he'd passed it onto someone else, breaking his word in the process. But not only that; remember my conditions, outlined above?

Oh yes, the information that Nina was so evidently desperate for me to receive, and had twice already authorised Crimes of Zion to divulge.

"..I'll pass on to you if you can assure me that it will be used for your interest only. No publishing on your site, no sharing with Hufschmid..."

Remember what I gave Crimes of Zion my word on?

"I give you my word that any information that you give me regarding Nina aka 'A Possum Princess' will not be published on any of my websites or shared with Eric Hufschmid."

From his little Nina "expose" page on his website:

I invite you, dear reader, to examine the following extract from a conversation that Nina recently had with a mutual acquaintance, and to draw your conclusions regarding the truthfulness of what Nina is telling us...

The Who Are You? page to which Crimes of Zion refers was published just AFTER Crimes of Zion began the first of his well-rehearsed attacks on me via Wake Up From Your Slumber. Prior to Crimes of Zion publicly attacking me, none of the information that Nina had relayed to me using Crimes of Zion as the conduit, had been published on either of my websites or shared with Eric Hufschmid.

So there you go. Jim Kerr aka Planet Quo is full of shit, and as such, can't be trusted at all, for anything, and should shut the fuck up.

As much as Crimes of Zion would like me to remain silent, I give him my word that I will continue to be most vociferous in my denunciation of him. I will continue to hunt him down and expose him. Crimes of Zion may consider that pledge to be written in stone. For as long as he continues to use other people's websites as a base for launching attacks on me, I will reciprocate in kind.

No more finger-pointing, no more Poseidon this and Debus that, no more "deceptive" this and "disinfo" that. That's right Jim, I'm talking to you. You've lied and deceived about Nina and her "IDF connections", and you outright lied to me, someone you've publicly declared as a "good friend" on NOLAJBS forum.

You mean this kind of finger-pointing, Criminal From Zion?.....

"So who are you, "duped"? I'm betting your other name is Sean. And I'm almost certain now that this PlanetQueer/Fagarsie campaign is an intelligence (and I use that word loosely) operation." (source)

"I'm 80% convinced now that the Quo/Fugazi/Whipette (Suzette) triumvirate is a Zionist operation, possibly without the knowledge of Fugazi and the Sooz." (source)

"I know another breed of subhumans who are renowned for the same methods of deception and penchant for lying that Kerr is; we call them Zionists." (source)

(source)

Can you believe this guy's chuptzah? Spot the Zionist Jew.

How ironic. Crimes of Zion asserts that I "outright lied" to him in the very same sentence that he himself lies through the skin of his teeth. He states that I "publicly declared" him as a "good friend" on the NOLAJBS forum. This is yet another demonstrable lie as I will prove conclusively in two steps.

The only way that anyone searching NOLAJBS for a connection between Crimes of Zion and PlanetQuo in regard of him supposedly being my "good friend" will find such a connection, is by entering the user name of Quo Vadius into the search engine:

Quo Vadius got it wrong though, I have never stated James Linton to be my "good friend." Only Quo Vadius a.k.a Brendon O'Connell and James Linton a.k.a. Brendon O'Connell have ever made that statement.

And indeed I was until you fucked with me and tried smearing the good name of an innocent young girl half your fucking age, all based on contrived bullshit and out-of-context tidbits.

Crimes of Zion has 'forgotten' that it was me who binned him. It was me who decided to terminate all contact with him. His 'friendship' is no loss to me since it was inconsequential in the first place. Crimes of Zion was never anything other than a MySpace contact who latched on to me in the middle of January before I banished him in the first days of May.

Although Crimes of Zion's good friend and "kosher" associate Nina is rather immature for her age, she cannot, however, under any circumstances be considered a "young girl", and would you, dear reader, deem these words to be the words of an "innocent"?

So it looks like you're in a "bit of a pickle"; if you deny the above quotes are your words, you're a liar (I've got the emails to prove it), and if you accept that they are, which of course they are, you're a liar by virtue of the broken promises therein.

Crimes of Zion is an idiot savant, if nothing else. He's already had to make numerous edits to his futile attempt at debunking me debunking him. Crimes of Zion has had to re-title his PlanetClouseau PI: Idiot Savant piece to PlanetClouseau P.I. Debunked, and was forced to erase all rerefences to "idiot savant" after this page was published. The reason why he had to do so much Orwelling will become crystal clear later. Crimes of Zion is the man who is in the Branston.

I suggest you put the brakes on your rapid descent into irrelevance and get busy exposing the real Zionists for a change.

As you wish, dear boy, as you wish.

The Big Green Monster Rears It's Ugly Head

Crimes of Zion - Thursday, 17th May - 05:17

Yes Michael (Fugazi is Michael of myspace for those of you that don't know), anyone that's just read my last post and clicked on the links has already seen your silly video.

You put it there as if you're proud of it, but as far as Nina goes, it's much ado about five-eighths of fuck all, champ.

Michael is indeed proud of our video production, and so too am I. Michael and I are prouder still of our follow-up production. We've given it the title of The French Deception. The video will appear on the front page of PlanetQuo.Com on Wednesday 27th June. Alas poor Nina, we knew her well.

Let's examine the evidence against Nina in the video then.

1. Nina is a mutual friend of DBS and Joe Molero of NOLAJBS, who is known to Nina only as NOLA.

Nina is a mutual friend and associate of Crimes of Zion, Daryl Bradford Smith and Joe Molero - owner of the NOLAJBS forum that Smith promoted on 5th December, and praised me for exposing a couple of months later. Smith has also promoted Nina in the past.

2. DBS and Nina have spoken on the telephone on occasion.

Eric Hufschmid is a more reliable source than Crimes of Zion vis a vis the regularity of the telephone conversations that Smith has with Nina. What Smith's webmaster has to say on this issue makes Crimes of Zion's "on occasion" assertion redundant.

3. Nina objected to TFC posting NOLA's personal details on their site, and asked Daryl to remove that information, which he did.

Perhaps she did, but this was not the reason for Nina's intervention. Nina told Crimes of Zion on 25th April that she contacted Smith because of the "plea I got from NOLA himself for help." Nina told Smith that the publication of Molero's name and known addresses on this page of The French Connection was "really gay... obnoxious.. whatever."

Smith was evidently persuaded by the substance and eloquence of Nina's argument, and duly had his webmaster remove the information that Nina had deemed to be "really gay."

The video, and Jim aka PlanetQuo's expose for that matter, is nothing but one big non sequitur, particularly with regard to Nina (although I do like the soundtrack).

On the contrary, Michael's video and my expose of Nina were instrumental in shedding light upon the dark horse that is Nina, and this is why Crimes of Zion has tried so hard to ridicule every piece of incriminating evidence that Michael and myself have produced. Our latest video production - The French Deception - goes even further. We don't just shed light upon her - we place her centre-stage and focus every super-trouper in the house on her. Boy oh boy, that psychobitchfromhell casts a dark shadow.

After a great deal of melodramatic posturing and pomp, it basically says nothing at all.

Crimes of Zion has summarised himself quite nicely, don't you think?

Super-imposed over photos of Nina, stolen by two 50 yr old men, I might add, are pretty little lovehearts which childishly insinuate that Daryl's calls to Nina are evidence of some sort of romantic infatuation he has with her.

The "stolen" images of Nina to which Crimes of Zion refers are images which she herself made publicly available via the Internet. As Crimes of Zion knows full well, once an individual places images in the public domain, those images become public property. One must be very careful about what one posts on the Internet.

Since Crimes of Zion has continuously emphasised just how much a "good friend" he considered me to be, one would have thought that my "good friend" might actually know my age. I am forty-seven. Michael is forty.

It seems the only exercise PlanetQuo gets is jumping to conclusions.

"It's about the only thing PlanetQuo got right in his expose, besides his identification of Joe Molero as being a Christian Zionist." (Source)

Now we know why Crimes of Zion is employed as a full-time Zionist disinformationalist, and not as a comedian.

Nina gave NOLA DBS' phone number after the latter posted NOLA's private info on his site, in order to provide a means by which the two could sort out their differences over the phone, without her being in the middle.

According to Nina,  she passed Smith's landline number (Daryl can't use SKYPE!!!) to Molero because the owner of NOLAJBS asked her to "share some personal information, such as Daryl's phone number." Nina then gave Smith's residential telephone number to Molero and asked him to name a specific day whereby Nina would call Smith to let him know that a call from Molero was imminent, and expressly instructed him not to publicly disclose Smith's residential telephone number, and to call Smith himself to "reason with him."

I now invite you, dear reader, to carefully scrutinise the comments below:

What in hell is wrong with you cheesy bastards?

Nina was introduced to DBS by me - something I regret as I have learned that his group is bullshit and most likely a bunch of 'them' being paid to screw US up.

Im sorry, Nina.

Another thing, I was the one who talked Nina into giving nola something about daryl. She decided on phone number. I kinda made her do it This is ANOTHER thing I regret, because I have subsequently found that the celebrated 'fight' on nolajbs.net was contrived theatre - and it seems that some of the operators knew that all along. (besides the fact that it wasnt used)

She wouldnt give ME the damn number however, ya bunch o freaken weirdos.

Her pic with the IDF shirt? She showed it to me.. I begged her to post it months ago just to see what the Smithraelites would do.

Understand something, Nina grew up in circles more priviledged than the average Joe, so she knows some of em. Plus - she lives in NY.

Nina is always one to give you the benefit of the doubt, that includes Daryl and the rest. Something many of us here know little about, myself included. Something we could use more of.

Nina kicks ass. And she has more balls than most people posting herein.

You're all insane.

The comments above were posted on the Daryl Bradford Smith Indicted  at 09:13 on Thursday 17th May by the poster known as Geeez. I know Geeez better as NewMath. He/she is the person who first posted details on the NOLAJBS forum of an address in Sheffield I once lived at. Crimes of Zion and Nina weep buckets of crocodile tears about the ethics of having one's personal information posted on the Internet whenever it is they or one of their associates whose personal details are being posted, yet both remain silent whenever their enemies personal details are being publicly disclosed. Hypocrites.

That phonecall was never made.

Which, of course, means that Joe Molero's 'differences' with Daryl Bradford Smith were not such an important matter after all.

But of course, according to PlanetQuo, all this is evidence of Nina being an "agent" of NOLAJBS, deviously "playing both sides" to fulfill her sinister agenda to convince TFC to cease linking to PlanetQuo.com's "NOLAJBS exposed" trilogy, which to anyone who looks closely enough at PlanetQuo's beef with DBS and Nina is the real reason behind all this hostility.

And Crimes of Zion shoots himself in the foot yet again. Dick Cheney - eat your heart out:

"She's playing both sides, but openly. Or stupidly. Or perhaps both." (Source)

The root cause of "all this hostility" is the fact that Daryl Bradford Smith promoted Nina, promoted NOLAJBS, promoted my expose of NOLAJBS, allowed Nina to dictate that the links to my expose be removed from the front page of The French Connection, continued to attack NOLAJBS, tells us to investigate all investigators, then refuses to answer questions when he is the one being investigated.

'Conflict of interests', I believe to be the term one would use to describe such duplicitous behaviour.

Jim aka PlanetQuo worked very long and hard on his little expose, just take a look.

Good idea. Take a look. Have a look at this one and this one too.

And that's only part one of the coming trilogy.

A three-part expose was indeed the original concept, but I now intend to completely revamp the NOLAJBS Exposed page so that the the information contained therein is updated to take account of developments since the article was first published.

When Daryl pulled the link to PlanetQuo.com, Jim was not a happy chappy.

I was more mystified than anything else. I didn't understand why Smith publicly praised me on 3rd April only to pull the rug from under my feet just a few days later. I fully understand now though - Nina told him to. Crimes of Zion says that he can see why Smith's 180 degree turn irritated me. Such an empathetic fellow is Jamie the Jew.

Traffic to PlanetQuo increased many-fold when TFC linked to PQ.

Crimes of Zion cannot possibly qualify his statement since he has never been privy to data pertinent to the traffic either of my websites receive. My NOLAJBS expose was published on the evening of Wednesday 28th March, and Eric Hufschmid posted a hyperlink to my article in the news section of The French Connection that same night. The analysis of traffic to PlanetQuo.Com and PlanetQuo.Net for April shows the traffic to the .com domain increased by the grand total of 252 visitors. This could hardly be described as a "many-fold increase". The number of visitors to the .net domain actually dropped.

In fact, in one of his emails he said to me that if Smith didn't link to the next installment of his NOLAJBS expose, PlanetQuo would no longer support iamthewitness.com, because "support is a two way street, Jamie".

And now, surprise surprise, here we are.

No surprise. I supported Smith and he supported me - until Nina told him not to. Ultimately, I didn't bother asking to link to the revised NOLAJBS expose.

Anyone can see that the driving force behind that video is spite.

Stevie Wonder can't.

Could it be that PlanetQuo is jealous of a 22yr old woman's phone relationship with Smith, his longtime idol?

Crimes of Zion is having a laugh. Daryl Bradford Smith is not my "idol" nor was he ever. I don't idolise anyone. I will, however, admit to being a huge fan of these two blokes for thirty-four years though!

Two weeks ago, PlanetQuo was the staunchest supporter of Smith and Hufschmid I've ever met in my life. Seriously.

That three high-profile supporters all decided to abandon ship at the same time should tell you that something is seriously amiss over there.

Anyway, take a good look and decide for yourself.

Well folks, you heard the man. Take a good look - at the useful idiots that represent Daryl and Eric's sleeping army. The Zionists must be quaking in their boots.

Fugazi: Infensus Mentis a.k.a. Crimes of Zion a.k.a. Jamie Linton.

Nice one, Captain Obvious. Your effort to create the impression that I'm somehow trying to conceal my identity is transparently deceptive. Anyone who's read my first post on this thread knows that Crimes of Zion is Infensus Mentis is Jamie Linton. Go back and read the post, dipshit. It's all there. Even my hotmail email addy was published therein.

And now they know too that Crimes of Zion is Infensus Mentis is Jamie Linton is also Brendon O'Connell is Brendon Lee O'Connell is Quo Vadius is Donnie Darko is True Believer is Fester. And who might the insidious Lord Sidious, public defender of Eireann Goddess be? Answers on a postcard please to Jacob Lintonwitz, 135 Fifth Avenue, Mount Lawley, Pert, Western Australia.

Evidently the fact that DBS has been compromised by a Christian Zionist via Nina is of no concern to you.

More deception.

Yep......sure is.

The falsehood is in the question itself, making the answer redundant.

Clever stuff, eh folks? The art of avoiding having to answer compromising questions. Crimes of Zion makes Michael Howard appear revelatory.

Has DBS been compromised by a Christian Zionist?

Yer damn tootin' he has......extra, extra......read all about it.

Dunno, don't care.

"It's about the only thing PlanetQuo got right in his expose, besides his identification of Joe Molero as being a Christian Zionist." (Source)

This is most telling indeed. Crimes of Zion would have us believe that he is an 'anti-Zionist' yet he cares not that Daryl Bradford Smith promoted a forum whose owner has PROVEN Christian Zionist connections. Worse, Crimes of Zion is a good friend and associate of the person who is at the centre of the NOLAJBS affair - the person who Crimes of Zion would have you believe was an "intermediatery", but who was, in actual fact, Joe Molero's agent. That Nina protects Molero, and that Crimes of Zion protects Nina, should tell you all you need to know.

Just imagine how Crimes of Zion would react if the name published here was Jim Kerr and not Joe Molero.

Comments that Crimes of Zion has made in respect of NOLAJBS:

But your "via Nina" assertion is false, for reasons I've already explained.

All that needs to be explained about Nina and NOLAJBS is explained here.

You would have us believe that Nina's mutual association with Molero and Smith is somehow tantamount to Zionist deception, or otherwise suspicious behaviour. It simply isn't.

"It simply isn't", he says despite there being a plethora of evidence to the contrary. Crimes of Zion reminds me of the black knight in Monty Python and the Holy Grail. Crimes of Zion reminds me of Lord Sidious in Revenge of the Sith.

Michael's statement was: "Evidently the fact that DBS has been compromised by a Christian Zionist via Nina is of no concern to you."

Fact 1: Daryl Bradford Smith promoted NOLAJBS.

Fact 2: Joe Molero, the owner of NOLAJBS, promotes a Christian Zionist website.

Fact3: This Christian Zionist website credits Joe Molero.

Fact 4: Nina defends Joe Molero via lies and deception.

Fact 5: Crimes of Zion defends Nina. Indeed, the defence of Nina is the rationale for his declaration of war. His "betrayal" by a "good friend" deception was the pretext.

Fact 6: Crimes of Zion is on the record as having stated that my "identification of Joe Molero as being a Christian Zionist" is correct.

Go figure.

The only deception I've seen lately on this thread has come from you and PlanetQuo.

Even though I had yet to post any comments. Halucinogenic of Zion sees things that have not actually happened. Perhaps he dropped too much acid on 17th May.

You provide no evidence at all for your accusations, just a silly little video depicting photos of Nina with red lovehearts all over them.

Michael's video production runs for 9 minutes and 3 seconds. The photograph of Nina with red loverhearts appears just three times and features for a grand total of just SEVEN SECONDS. It is indicative of Crimes of Zion's complete lack of objectivity that he focuses exclusively on 1.29% of the total footage. Crimes of Zion offers no analysis of the remaining 98.71% nor does he dispute the authenticity of the other information contained therein.

In fact, as everyone on this thread has seen, your evidence against Nina is nonexistent, because there simply is none.

Here we go again. If I say it "simply" isn't so then it "simply" isn't so. Sanctimonious prick.

Put up or shut up.

That Daryl Bradford Smith's webmaster has already confirmed that Smith has had regular telephone converstations with Nina renders Crimes of Zion's opinion on the issue is rendered inconsequential. It is upon such damning evidence that the video was based.

Can you explain why you are defending a 22 year old person who, not only is a friend of NOLAJBS aka Joe Molero, has contributed nothing in the war against the "crimes of Zion", wields so much power over DBS (not just a few phone calls as you suggest in your effort to minimize the damage, Eric confirmed this) and yourself?

Yeah, I can explain it. Because she's a friend of mine, and I won't listen to lies about my friends. This "so much power" crap is just that - crap.

The "lies" that Crimes of Zion claims Michael and I are allegedly telling have already been dealt with in previous paragraphs, and I see no further need to address the issue again. Crimes of Zion tells us that the influence Nina is able to exert upon Daryl Bradford Smith is "crap."

Fact 1: Nina is the person who got Smith to remove the links to my expose of NOLAJBS from the front page of The French Connection. She was forced to admit this.

Fact 2: Before being forced to admit her complicity, Nina lied when Suzette first challenged her. Worse, Nina tried to point the finger at a completely innocent party. As per usual, whenever Nina is put on the spot and caught lying, she just comes out with one of her 'jokes'.

And this is the "fucking quality human being" that Crimes of Zion defends to the hilt.

It is highly significant that Crimes of Zion does not dispute that Nina's contribution to the anti-Zionist movement has been absolutely zilch. Her contribution to the Zionist movement has, however, been considerable.

why do you promote Alex Jones, a Zionist denier and protector of the "crimes of Zion" along with other known suspect sites on your myspace profile?

I've already shown the readers of this thread my myspace profile. On it I've placed links to all the sites I've found helpful in my research, for the purposes of helping others to do their own. I just counted 29 banner-links, and only one leads to Jones, specifically the Jones Report. I'm hardly an Alex Jones cheerleader. The words "Alex Jones" don't even appear on my profile.

Exhibit A and Exhibit B offer conclusive and incontrovertible proof that Crimes of Zion is a compulsive liar.

Now you come out of nowhere to defend a 22 year old woman who you claim to be a friend of, a friend that you would like to f*** over and over (as stated in you messages to Planetquo via myspace) simply because she responded to your initial contact.

More lies. I believe my words to PlanetQuo were "I'd love to fuck her". I still would, who wouldn't?

I wouldn't, God knows where she's been. She probably has more fingerprints on her arse than the FBI have on file. Besides, I prefer classy, sophisticated, interesting, witty, mature brunettes with a decent set of tits. Stick insects I find repugnant.

But your "over and over" bullshit is a lie, designed to make me sound stupid, I presume. It aint gonna work.

Exhibit C:

Michael's point was that Crimes of Zion made repeated statements of how strong his desire to exchange body fluids with Nina (what a horrid thought) is.

Why not simply show yourself? All this hiding behind fancy images and names with hidden meanings in an attempt to sound somewhat mystical is painful if not comical.

Michael, Michael Michael. There you go again, being deceptive and trying to mislead the unwary. I've revealed my full name; you have not. Again, for the record, it's James Linton. What's yours?

It's Michael Stewart, and Michael has only one name, unlike you, Lord Brendon Sidious O'Connell Linton.

And as far as "revealing myself" goes, I've been "revealed" since day one. I've already linked to my myspace profile from here, on which there are photographs of myself. Here is my picture page. Handsome, aren't I?

Nope. You're one of the ugliest twats that I've ever had the misfortune to lay my eyes upon. No wonder you can't laid and have to resort to getting off on watching Indian women frig themselves via your webcam. Is that a glass eye that you have? Your righthand jaw looks as if someone has smacked you with a baseball bat. If so, good on 'em.

Readers of this thread know very well that I'm not "hiding behind fancy images and names with hidden meanings". You're full of shit, Michael, and it's here for everyone to see. The fact of the matter is, I have the truth on my side, and that being the case, you're fighting a war you just won't win, champ.

We shall soon see who will emerge victorious. You are going to need copious amounts of duct-tape to survive the nukes that will soon be heading your way. You have played all your cards Linton - we haven't even started on you yet sonny boy.

I'm well aware of what is happening here Jamie and you know that I do, it's just a shame that your head is filled with dick and not a brain to think critically which leads intelligent people to consider the possibility that you are either one of the useful idiots Eric keeps telling us about or you're simply a bad guy working to muddy the waters of clarity and truth.

Go and check the homepage of WUFYS, Michael. Two of my articles are posted there today (May 17 2007). Does it look like I'm "muddying the waters of clarity and truth"? I thought not.

Yes, three cheers for Mike Rivero and Mark Glenn. Where would Crimes of Zion be without their support? Why, I wonder, are they so candidly supporting a third-rate blogger who is very much the new kid on the block when it comes to the crimes of Zionists? Mike and Mark would be well-advised to cease promoting Crimes of Zion with immediate effect.

And where, might I ask, is your research?

Michael's research was posted on his old MySpace accounts, but was removed when he deleted both his accounts. I do recall you posting praiseworthy comments on several of them. In time, Michael's older research will be hosted on PlanetQuo.Com along with the joint-projects that we intend to begin working on in the near future. For the time being though, you, Nina and Smith are our prime concern. You three are toast.

What are you contributing to the fight against Zionism?

Michael has forgotten more about Zionism than Crimes of Zion will ever know. Michael has been studying Zionism for ten years. Crimes of Zion's track-record in the study of Zionism stretches back all of six weeks.

All I see you doing is picking on young girls like a bully, from a safe distance away, hiding behind your computer like a poofter.

How would Crimes of Zion know how homosexual men behave? Is there something he's not telling us? His frequent references to homosexuality say more about him than the people he is trying to mock. Perhaps Crimes of Zion is a repressed closet gay.

If you imagine that I have anything more to contribute to this distraction within this thread, you're wrong.

You're right. You have nothing to contribute, you never did.

So why did Crimes of Zion post regular praiseworthy comments on Michael's old MySpace blogs?

The thread is "Daryl Bradford Smith Indicted" and not "The Innocence of Nina"

Don't tell me what to post on this thread. I'll post what I like.

This is what Crimes of Zion wrote in response to comments that I made on one of his cut-and-paste blog entries:

"You're just being a spiteful little pain in the arse, that's all this is. But you should've known you'd lose this war; I am, after all, fighting with an unarmed man.

Now explain to the WUFYS community why they should trust you or anything from you when I've just demonstrated that you're a complete fucking lowlife liar. Either that, or piss off out of my thread."

Child of Zion feels at liberty to make whatever offensive comments he likes on other people's blogs, but should anyone else have the audacity to make comments that baby Jamie doesn't like on his blog, he starts crying like a kid who has just had its mothers tit removed from its mouth. This is one reason why his enemies refer to him as Infantile Mentalitus.

who has already been exposed as a double-minded close friend of a Christian Zionist who promotes Ron Paul who says that America deserved to be attacked and is a supporter of the official 911 cover story. Keep drooling Jamie, you're outed. Regards, Michael.

The only people exposing themselves on this thread are you and Quo, as complete idiots and possible agent provocateurs.

How is it possible to 'expose' myself on a blog entry on Wake Up From Your Slumber in which I had yet to post any comments?

And Crimes of Zion calls me an idiot. Idiot.

Anyone reading this thread with a discerning mind can see which one of us is coming from a position of truth.

Crimes of Zion assumes that any individual who possesses critical-analyitcal skills will automatically agree that Crimes of Zion has a monopoly on truth. Crimes of Zion operates on a 'it must be true if I say so' basis. How arrogant, presumptuous and self-righteous is this?

Michael and I do the research, lay it all out in front of you, and leave you free to draw your own conclusions. We don't continually overstate our case.

Now piss off and leave my friend alone.

No chance. Michael and I will continue to expose you and your friend for the Zionist operatives that you both are.

Planet Quo M.I.A.

Crimes of Zion - Thursday, 17th May - 12:54

So Fugazi, where's PlanetQuo?

Dedicated Exposer Of Zionists

They seek him here, they seek him there
His exposes are loud but never bare
It will make or break him so he's got to do his best
Cause he's a dedicated exposer of Zionists

And when he does his little rounds
Crimes of Zion's dark Zionist heart pounds
Eagerly pursuing Zionists along with crypto Jews
Cause he's a dedicated exposer of Zionists

Oh yes he is (oh yes he is), oh yes he is (oh yes he is)

Has he sent you here to do his fighting for him?

The Greatest Fighter

When Crimes of Zion posts late at night
The dross he writes fills me with delight, it's all shite
C.O.Z is desperate, can't you tell?
His mind is racing but his time is as well
It's so funny, he's a sham

He's the greatest fighter in Mount Lawley
Got into a brawl over some girl, "little girl"
He'll get beaten, his scars won't heal
His mouth will open but his ears never will
It's so funny, he's a sham

I just outed him as a complete and utter liar, he should be here defending himself if he has issues with the veracity of my assertions.

It's My Website

It's my website and I'll hide if I want to
Hide if I want to, hide if I want to
You would hide too if it happened to you

Nobody knows where PlanetQuo has gone
But Infensus Mentis left the same time
Why was he being Nina's good friend?
When he's supposed to be mine

It's my website and I'll hide if I want to
Hide if I want to, hide if I want to
You would hide too if it happened to you

I know he's been watching and reading all this, it's all he fucking does.

Every Breath You Take

Every breath you take
Every post you make
Every word you break
Every piss you take
Ill be watching you

Every single day
Every word you say
Every game you play
Every night you stay
Ill be watching you

He's the forum-busting "exposer" guy, doesn't miss a thing.

That's pretty much what Brendon O'Connell reckons as well.

He vociferously reserves the right to demand answers from Daryl, so the sanctimonious prick had better come up with some of his own.

Question

Why do we never get an answer
When we're asking Daryl Bradford Smith
Lots of uncomfortable questions
About Joe Molero, Nina, and their little tiff?
And when we stop and look around us
There are answers that we need
In a world of Zionist deception
Between the lines we must read

Why do we never get an answer?
When we're knocking at Daryl's door
Because the truth is hard to swallow
That's what this war over Nina is for

The Status of Quo

Crimes of Zion - Thursday, 17th May - 19:32

Michael, do you really think I haven't been over the WhoAreYou? file? Of course I have, and therein lies my beef with PlanetQuo, and by extension, yourself.

Once again, Crimes of Zion confirms that the reason he declared war on me was because of the damage that his good friend and "kosher" associate Nina has sustained as a consequence of me exposing her, and once again, Crimes of Zion confirms that he and Brendon O'Connell prefer to use "beef with..." rather than alternatives such as complaint, issue or problem.

There are two main reasons for this war: #1. The false (and I know for a fact they're false) allegations against Nina, whom I now consider a good friend.

I think it can be stated with absolute certainty that there can be no doubt whatsoever that Crimes of Zion is fighting Nina's war by proxy. This is what Crimes of Zion had to say about Nina on 25th April:

"I'm not trying to defend her Jim, I'm just playing devil's advocate and balancing out your err-on-the-side-of-dubious angle."

"I'm not going to trust in her in any meaningful way. I agree, she's dubious."

"I have no relationship with her to speak of."

"she's a piss in the sea to me."

"But ultimately, I don't care. Go ahead and expose her, "make her pay" etc etc. Heh heh. But don't be breaking your promise to me."

Three weeks later, Crimes of Zion is screaming from the rooftops about how much of a "good friend" Nina is, and how much of a "fucking quality human being" she is, and of how "kosher" she is.

How fickle we are.

As I keep saying, Crimes of Zion's only consistency is his inconsistency.

I know things that you don't Michael, you're just going to have to trust me.

Trust and Crimes of Zion are mutually incompatible. Crimes of Zion and Nina though are two peas from the same pod. Anyone for some Risi e Bisi?

If I still trusted Jim, he might be privy to some of it, but he violated that trust, which I'll get to in a minute.

How convenient. Within weeks of me getting shot of Crimes of Zion, my supposed "good friend" and "former ally" (his words, not mine) 'suddenly' has access to inside information that he might have shared with me had I not binned him.

With regard to my role in Nina's defense: think what you like about my "dick running my brain", but I'd do exactly the same for a male friend.

It is a matter of fact that Crimes of Zion has a pre-occupation with sex, and he does indulge in some perverted acts, and harbour some very dangerous abnormal sexual fantasies. Sicko.

And you know this firsthand, Michael; you bore witness to my involvement in the NOLAJBS war, which I fought in support of Jim Kerr aka PlanetQuo, because I considered him a friend. I wasn't there for my own reasons, he knows that.

Source

Fact 1: Crimes of Zion became a member of NOLAJBS ONE WEEK IN ADVANCE of hostilities commencing.

Fact 2: A week after the fight began on the Ed Haas and the conversation in Hebrew thread that I had initiated in December 2006, Crimes of Zion entered the fray - as a guest. Crimes of Zion apparently 'forgot' that he was already a member. And despite him praising the research that I had conducted on Ed Haas and his dubious associations, Crimes of Zion contributed absolutely zilch to the discussion. On the contrary, he did nothing except antagonise and pour petrol over the fire. This was not in the least bit surprising since that is precisely why he appeared on the Ed Haas thread in the first place. It was precisely the same tale on the Daryl Bradford Smith Is Convinced NOLAJBS.Net Is Another Zionist Group thread that I also initiated.

Although Crimes of Zion would have you believe that his participation in the Ed Haas thread was borne out of some noble act of loyalty to me, his true rationale is revealed in the screenshot below.

Fact 3: Crimes of Zion 'supported' me by providing my enemy with ammunition to fire at me. Brendon O'Connell a.k.a. Quo Vadius a.k.a. Donnie Darko has consistently attempted to discredit me by repeatedly linking me with James Linton. O'Connell has used my supposed 'friendship' with Linton as the weapon with which he has attempted to attack and discredit me. It is no coincidence that Linton has also attempted to use his imagined 'friendship' with me as the SOLE basis for his attempt to discredit me. What we have here, dear reader, is the exact same tactic being deployed by two seemingly different entities who 'just happen' to live in the same suburb of the same Australian city, who 'just happen' to share a common enemy, who 'just happen' to share the same modus operandi and operate in the exact same fashion.

Once is happestance. Twice is coincidence. Three times is enemy action.

James Linton and Brendon O'Connell are one and the same. Go figure.

Furthermore, her private email to me and the fact that it found it's way onto a public forum is something I'm entirely responsible for, so needless to say, I feel more than a little bit obliged to refute all the subsequent claims that have arisen about her since it was leaked.

Nina's "Private" e-mail? Pardonne moi? A "leaked" e-mail? Non comprendez. I reiterate what Nina told Crimes of Zion on 25th April:

"I thought about this and really, it shouldn't be a problem. You can tell whomever whatever you wish."

"divulge whatever you wish"

Which leads me to #2. Regardless of what Jim aka PlanetQuo has told you about how or from whom or under what conditions he obtained the email from Nina that was posted on the NOLAJBS forum by Suzette, and later on his site, I can assure you, my version of events regarding our agreement about that email is accurate.

The e-mail that Crimes of Zion refers to was not obtained from Nina - it was given to me by Crimes of Zion. Indeed, the only e-mail that I have ever received direct from Nina is the one below -  the IP address of which can be traced to Berlin.

I don't bullshit, Michael. I trusted him, and he fucked me over.

Listening to Crimes of Zion say that he doesn't bullshit is like listening to Tony Blair say that Britain has not become a police state.

Where I come from, you're only as good as your word, and by that standard, Jim Kerr is a piece of shit, and I'll never trust him again. Ever. PlanetQuo and I are now enemies, for good, notwithstanding a public apology, which you know as well I do will not be forthcoming.

Yes, we know where YOU come from Mr. Criminal from Zion. Jew Central, was the name I believe your alter-ego gave to Mount Lawley, and by that standard, there is a high probability of Crimes of Zion being a Jew. I'm delighted to hear that Criminal from Zion does not trust me - I would be most concerned indeed if he did.

Crimes of Zion and myself are indeed enemies - we were never anything but.

I could sit here and debunk, point by point, his case against Nina, but who has the fucking time he has for such inane bullshit?

I have - as this page, this page, this page and the one that you are currently reading show. Since I have taken, the time, trouble and effort to debunk Crimes of Zion point-by-point, why can't he do likewise? The answer is simple - the facts do not support his 'case'. This is his best effort. Pah.

Why does Crimes of Zion feel obligated to be Nina's shining black knight in armour? Why doesn't she defend herself? Why has the job of defending Nina been allocated to Crimes of Zion? Go figure.

Look at him, for fuck's sake.

Here I am!

Look at this ridiculous folly.

Well folks, you heard the man - so go take a look at this ridiculous folly.

Surely you're lucid and human enough to see that the sort of dirt PlanetQuo digs up about people on his little forum-stalking forays is the same kind of shit the fucking GOP digs up to smear opponents, not what you do to people online. It's petty and ridiculous, and he's a snivelling little cunt who deserves a headbutt in the face for it.

Whenever Crimes of Zion writes disparaging articles about me, or posts abusive, insulting and derogatory comments about me on Wake Up From Your Slumber, he is 'telling the truth' but whenever I write pieces that expose him and his good friend and associate Nina, they are "hitpieces" that "smear" my adversaries. And if this is "not what you do to people online", then how does Crimes of Zion account for the regularity of his abusive, vitriloic character assassination of myself and my friends Michael and Suzette?

 It's a pity that Crimes of Zion is in Australia and that I am in Britain, because if he were resident in Britain, I would invite him to confront me and attempt to to headbutt me in the face and walk away unscathed. Although Crimes of Zion regularly mocks my disability, he does not seem to realise that a one-armed man needs only one hand to split an enemy aggressor's skull wide open with a baseball bat or stab them through the heart with a Bowie knife. Uninvited guests are advised to bear this in mind if thinking of making an impromptu visit to my home.

Look at the link he provides as supposed evidence of her "regular telephone contact with Madthumbs"

From his "Nina Expose":

""But since Nina has already confirmed that she is an associate of, and has had regular telephone contact with Madthumbs, it would be highly improbable for Nina to not already know of Smith's alleged heavy drinking/alcoholism. Whippette merely reiterated what had already been made common knowledge by Matthew Benedict and Phil Jayhan."

The statement from Who Are You? that Crimes of Zion cites was not published as evidence in respect of the regularity of Nina's telephone conversations with Matthew Benedict. My statement was produced in evidence of the fact that Nina falsely accused Suzette of making public Daryl Bradford Smith's alcoholism when she had merely reiterated what Madthumbs, Phil Jayhan and others had already made public. My full statement reads as follows:

On 18th March, Madthumbs had this to say about Daryl Bradford Smith: "Daryl has hepatitis and shouldn't be drinking, though he does. I know him well enough to say I highly doubt he asked you to join him. He does have fits of anger, and a propensity for drinking."

Phil Jayhan, owner of the Letsroll911.org forum, also has some "dirt" to share: "Darrel is a raging alcoholic. He called me 3 weeks ago, while in an inebriated fit of anger and threatened me numerous ways, all of them ambiguous, unless "I joined" his organization, as if he is some sort of Mafia Joe or something."

It is self-evident that Whippette was not, as Nina falsely alleges, the party responsible for making details of Daryl Bradford Smith's illnesses public. Nina claims that had Whippette not "chosen to share that kind of personal information about Mr. Smith here in the forum", then she "would never have known or even suspected it."

But since Nina has already confirmed that she is an associate of, and has had regular telephone contact with Madthumbs, it would be highly improbable for Nina to not already know of Smith's alleged heavy drinking/alcoholism. Whippette merely reiterated what had already been made common knowledge by Matthew Benedict and Phil Jayhan.

I reckon that A Possum Princess owes Whippette a public apology, but don't hold your breath Suzette.

See what spurious codswallop he passes off as "evidence"? Or does he just fill up these "exposes" with a gazillion arbitrary hyperlinks because he knows no one has the time or inclination to bother clicking on them all?

How does Crimes of Zion know that people don't have the inclination or the time to peruse the evidence that I furbish via hyperlinks? The question is, of course, rhetorical. Crimes of Zion cannot possibly qualify his absurd statement. Like almost everything else that comes out of his big mouth, he just says it and hopes that people will believe it.

Because let's face it, Michael, the public interest value of these insipid, protracted writeups of his is exactly