(This page will be completely revamped sometime during the Autumn to take account of developments since it was first published. The page was last updated on 6th April)
Introduction
This is the first of a trilogy of short essays that will closely scrutinise NOLAJBS.net, and mainly concerns three of the key players at NOLAJBS. LoneWolf merits a mention since it is he who has been writing lots of e-mails to Daryl Bradford Smith and Eric Hufschmid, and since it was he who banned me from the forum. Also mentioned is Donnie Darko as it was she who fired the opening salvos.
After a brief explanation of who LoneWolf is (and who he is not!!!) and who Donnie Darko is (and who she is not!!!), the spotlight then moves away from the monkeys, and onto the organ-grinder himself. The mysterious owner of the NOLAJBS forum is brought out into the light, and his Zionist connections exposed.
Part two of this trilogy will focus exclusively upon the recent controversy which took place on that Forum. I will demonstrate how this forum operates, and outline the tactics that they deploy against those who cross them. I will present a factual account of the events that led to the state of war that now exists between PlanetQuo and NOLAJBS.
Part three will debunk the lies that NOLAJBS published on their 'official blog' on 20th February under the heading of Deguello Bradford Smith? The article makes several allegations against myself, my friend and collaborator, Fugazi, and against Daryl Bradford Smith. None of the accusations made by NOLAJBS have any basis in reality.
Since publication of this essay on 27th April, comments about it have begun to appear on blogs and forums. Consider this comment made on the Politically Correct Apostate blog:
Mr. Maynard,
I know it's almost a year since you wrote this thing, but it is relevant today and will always be tomorrow!
I've watched DBS and Eric for sometime and their latest smear exposes 'them' even more. There's a guy by the name of Jim Kerr, admin of PlanetQuo.com, who is part of 'them' and they have wrongly attacked the owner of nolajbs.net, all because 'they' could not control him. It all came down to them wanting him to moderate certain threads, which basically positioned 'them' in the Moderator/Admin position. The owner told them to piss off, but in a nice way. Then 'they' started to look for needles in the haystack and came up with straws, and posted some crap on their site. The owner retaliated and very diplomatically held his ground - it was quite a show. It should have been a draw, but 'they' now are doing a 3 Part smear campaign and getting DIRTY. They've posted his name and addresses and even bared false witness against him. How's that for this "Iamthewitness" douche bags?
Oh, btw ... Eric's book is a product of The Church of Scientology. :-)
Here we have a female member of NOLAJBS.Net posting insults and lies on a public blog, and on yet another hidden thread within the NOLAJBS forum. The woman who operates the Donnie Darko and Quo Vadius handles on NOLAJBS has once again shown herself to be an incompetent liar and disinformationalist. I hadn't intended to discuss the Lizard Woman until part two of this trilogy, but since she's been lying about me on Chris Womack's blog, I might as well get started on her now.
Donnie Darko was the attack dog that NOLAJBS unleashed on me at the outset of the conflict. Although she has a male pseudonym, Donnie is actually a woman - but some of us knew that from the start. No man could possibly be such a bitch.
This bitch, however, is all bark and no bite - as we shall see in part two. Having been taken on and then taken apart, Donnie Darko lost the war she started with me, along with the little credibilty she had to begin with. As a consequence of the damage sustained, NOLAJBS had no other viable option but to jettison the user handle. Two weeks after I was banned from NOLAJBS, Donnie Darko had her account 'frozen', and it has remained dormant since. Alas, the bitch hasn't though. Donnie Darko is dead - long live Quo Vadius.
The operators of the NOLAJBS are cunning if nothing else. Before they could discard the Donnie Darko account, they had to first to embark upon a face-saving mission. This is how they did it. Tag-team wrestling at its finest. The Donnie Darko handle was put into cold-storage, and Quo Vadius created as a replacement. The name may have changed but it's the same operator. One can change one's handle but one cannot change one's idiosyncrasies.
While the choice of Quo Vadius - and a very appropriate choice it was too - as a handle was a tad obvious, the e-mail address was a dead giveaway. Bigpond is an Australian-based Internet service provider thus Quo Vadius is based in Australia. Donnie Darko is based in Australia too. Coincidence?
Once is happenstance.
Twice is coincidence.
Three times is enemy action.
Four times is no coincidence.
Five times is strong evidence.
Six times is a smoking gun.
Note how the woman operating the Quo Vadius handle consistently mis-spells absolutely. Quo Vadius has written absoloutly instead of absolutely. The female operator of the Donnie Darko handle also experienced some difficulty with the correct spelling of absolutely. She too wrote that particular word as absoloutly. The similarities don't end there.
Compare the writing style of Donnie Darko with that of Quo Vadius. Note the references made to PlanetQuo in each piece. The woman who operated the Donnie Darko handle and is now operating the Quo Vadius profile is the nut case. The woman who posted the derogatory comments about myself and the "Iamthewitness douche bags" is the unstable nut-job. Someone who believes that they can attempt to deceive in this manner and get away with it is experiencing delusions of grandeur on a massive scale. Virgoans are renowned for their diligence, methodicalness and analytical ability, Scorpions for their arrogance, self-indulgence and indolence. Absoloutly!
Why is the owner of this forum allowing this deception to take place? The question, of course, is rhetorical, the answer rather obvious. He is an integral part of this web of deception and lies. Indeed, he is at the very hub of it - NOLAJBS is his forum!
And Isn't it amazing that none of the regular posters on NOLAJBS managed to spot what was glaringly obvious to me and about two dozen other NOLAJBS observers?
NOLAJBS have deleted the incriminating post that Donnie Darko made in the 'Sand Box' at 01:11:56 on 24th February, 2007, but it matters not. A smoking gun is a smoking gun is a smoking gun. The deception that is coming out of the NOLAJBS forum is co-ordinated, and is very much a team effort. NOLAJBS is a rats nest of Zionist deception.
"They've posted his name and addresses and even bared false witness against him", wails anonymous aka Quo Vadis aka Donnie Darko, in stout defence of the owner of Nolajbs.net, conveniently omitting the inconvenient fact that the owner of NOLAJBS published details of my address five weeks BEFORE I published details of his. NOLAJBS was "wrongly attacked", she screams. No kidding.
As you will have gleaned from the screenshots above, the scumsack owner of NOLAJBS forum got his just desserts. If you can't stand the heat, stay out of the kitchen. Avoid the boiler-room too. The only people who were wrongly attacked were Daryl Bradford Smith, Eric Hufschmid, Fugazi and myself.
"They started to look for needles in the haystack and came up with straws", asserts Australia's equivalent of Pinnochio. The "straws" that I found are now presented for Donnie Darko aka Quo Vadis, Vito Lapiccola aka Rudi Weyrich, and Joe Molero aka NOLAJBS to suck on.
I will leave it to you, dear reader, to decide who is blowing bubbles and making all the slurping noises.
Deguello Bradford Smith is reproduced here with a link to the original article. NOLAJBS have since removed Deguello Bradford Smith from their 'official blog'. A Google cache is still available though. Should the Google cache suddenly vanish too, the screenshots to be found further down the page will provide a permanent record. And if the allegations that NOLAJBS make in Deguello Bradford Smith are true, then one must wonder why that particular blog entry was 'Orwelled' a few days after this essay was published. Go figure.
How It All Began
On 5th December, 2006, Daryl Bradford Smith made a broadcast in which he briefly promoted the NOLAJBS forum. Click this link to listen to Daryl’s broadcast. NOLAJBS is mentioned around the 22:28 mark.
I became a member of the NOLAJBS forum the next day on the basis of what Daryl Bradford Smith had said about them during his broadcast. If Smith had not drawn my attention to the existence of the NOLAJBS forum, I never would have heard of it. Smith states in his broadcast that he has discovered a new forum, and that this forum is an offshoot of Liberty Forum. He goes on to say that NOLAJBS invited him to act as a moderator but that he declined their offer due to time constraints.
While Smith initially praised NOLAJBS, he also stated that one can "be wrong about people." How very true indeed. Furthermore, Smith tells of how the previous forum that he was involved with – Opposing Digits – suckered him in. Daryl obviously made an error of judgment in getting involved with OD, and he erred again in promoting NOLAJBS. But to his credit he did forewarn of Zionist deception in the NOLAJBS forum.
His warning was subsequently proven to be accurate.
NOLAJBS state in their 'official blog' that one of their administrators had been badgering Daryl Bradford Smith "for a couple of months prior" to his December 5th broadcast. NOLAJBS say that LoneWolf had been sending Smith e-mails to try and persuade him to link I Am The Witness with the NOLAJBS forum, the stated purpose being the swapping of links and traffic. NOLAJBS further state that it would make "perfect sense" for the two sites to link since LoneWolf believed that Smith’s research was closest to what NOLAJBS "already knew", and that Smith was more preferable than Alex Jones and "other talking heads."
A Gigolo In Wolf’s Clothing
During a recent e-mail correspondence with Eric Hufschmid, LoneWolf says that his name is Rudi Weyrich. His NOLAJBS profile states that he is fifty-five years of age.
The handsome young beast pictured below is Vito Lapiccola. Vito is thirty-six years young, and, according to his MySpace profile, resides in Hollywood. Vito Lapiccola is actually LoneWolf with nineteen years chopped-off his age. NOLAJBS confirms that Vito Lapiccola and LoneWolf are one and the same via the comments he posted on Lapiccola’s blog.
As can be seen from LoneWolf's NOLAJBS profile, he is a resident of Vancouver Island, Canada. So who is the real LoneWolf? Is LoneWolf a 36 year-old swinger with aspirations to make it big in the movie business, and is impersonating a middle-aged Canadian, or is it the other way round? Vito Lapiccola or Rudi Weyrich? Will the real LoneWolf please stand up.
Lapiccola/Weyrich claims that I was banned for breaching the forum's terms of service but does not specify the personal information that I supposedly revealed in the NOLAJBS forum or "elsewhere." He can produce no evidence of my alleged 'revelations' because no such disclosures were ever made. The reason that he supplies for me being banned is a lie. At no time did I reveal any personal information regarding any other member of the NOLAJBS forum. I challenge Lapiccola/Weyrich to produce one scrap of evidence in support of what he alleges. Put up or shut up.
If, as LoneWolf claims, revealing the personal information of another member is deemed serious enough to merit being banned, then questions need to be raised as to why he did not also ban the imbecile who posts under the handle of NewMath. Since NewMath posted a link to a Sheffield directory that revealed the address from where my websites are registered, LoneWolf is guilty of not only lying about the reason for me being banned, he is also guilty of blatant hypocrisy.
The statement above outlines the forum's privacy policy. Perhaps the site owner should add the following: these terms do not apply if you are part of the forum clique.
It is rather ironic that after falsely claiming that I breached their privacy policy, NOLAJBS then post details on their website of a business address that I am connected with, along with details of my IP address. Daryl Bradford Smith's IP address was also revealed as was Fugazi's. A photograph of Fugazi's wife was also published. Publication of this photograph was most unwise, ditto publication of my personal details - as the man responsible for these publications will soon discover to his detriment. I do not take kindly to being lied about, slandered, abused and having my personal details revealed on a public Internet forum.
The owner of NOLAJBS then has the audacity to falsely insinuate that Fugazi, Daryl Bradford Smith and myself are "signalling local sayanims to physically do me harm." The lying, paranoic then asks: "why else would my physical location be relevant?" I ask NOLAJBS the same question. Why should my physical location be of revelance? Why were my personal details published other than as an act of sheer maliciousness on his part?
If the owner of the NOLAJBS forum genuinely felt threatened, he should have reported the matter to the local police as I did in February when my personal details were first revealed on his forum by NewMath. At no time then, and at no time since, have I, Fugazi or Daryl Bradford Smith made any threats of violence against any member of NOLAJBS, either directly or via third-parties. These slanderous insinuations are a lie.
Details of the NOLAJBS forum owner's home address were published for a short time on this page but not by me, and not by Fugazi. Since Daryl Bradford Smith is not the webmaster of the I Am The Witness website, and since NOLAJBS knew that prior to publishing Daryl's IP address, any suggestion that Smith posted these details is also a lie. Equally false is the insinuation made by NOLAJBS that Daryl Bradford Smith, Fugazi and myself are "in contact" with "local Sayanims." Another lie - another product of a seriously paranoid individual's vivid imagination. I challenge the owner of the NOLAJBS forum to produce evidence in substantiation of the slanderous allegations that he has made against me. Put up or shut up.
NOLAJBS = Joseph Anthony Molero
Joseph Anthony Molero doesn't like to be publicly identified but since he unjusitifiably published my personal details on his website, I will now settle that particular score by publishing his personal details on mine. Fair enough Joe? Let's do battle by your rules of engagement then. Open wide for a taste of your own medicine.
Joe Molero is the owner of the NOLAJBS forum, although he has recently transferred registration of his website to someone living in Vancouver, Canada - most probably to his friend Vito...oops...sorry...Rudi. The new IP address of the NOLAJBS forum is 66.225.201.13 No e-mail address is given but anyone wishing to contact the elusive Mr. Molero can do so via NOLAJBS.NET, P.O. Box 821650, Vancouver, WA 98682.
A detailed search of the domain records pertaining to NOLAJBS.net, will reveal that the domain was previously registered to the following address:
1809 Magazine
Penthouse
New Orleans
LA 70130
According to this report from the Southern Animal Foundation, there was a blaze in August 2002 at 1809 Magazine, New Orleans. The fire broke-out in premises occupied by The Cat Practice. The report also states that six cats belonging to a staff member of The Cat Practice and her husband, died in the fire. The owners of the cats lived in an apartment above, and are identified as Amanda and Joe Molero.
NOLAJBS.net was most recently registered to this address:
304 1/2 Decatur Street
New Orleans
LA 70130
I assume that this is where the Moleros relocated to following the blaze at their previous address. An outlay of $19.95 could prove to be a sound investment for anyone interested in unearthing further information about the not-so-mysterious-now owner of NOLAJBS. Perhaps Molero will think twice before he ever reveals anyone else's personal details on a public Internet forum, or allows muppets such as NewMath to do so.
Joe Molero claims that he ended his involvement with the New Orleans chapter of the John Birch Society in July, 2004. In a post that he made on the Freedom Underground forum in September, 2004, Molero makes the following statement:
"I have been with the JBS for many years, and always reserved the possibility of them being a front organization. I've been studying the Zionist aspect of the conspiracy for a while. The first go around, when I confronted the JBS, they were able to pull the wool over my eyes because I didn't know enough. The second time, they failed. In July of 2004, I gave them the boot when they tried to tell me to stay away from certain people as well as wanting to control what I placed on my web site. Then everything else fell into place. I saw them naked and bearing reproach on America by hijacking many patriots and getting them to do the cha-cha-cha and playing footsies with the Insiders. They were, and to this day, are a Zionist front funded by Nelson Rockefeller himself."
Molero states that he resigned his position as chapter leader of the New Orleans branch of the John Birch Society in July, 2004. If this is true, then how does he explain this discrepancy?
Molero wrote this article in January, 2003. It begins with "Back when I was Birching...." Simple logic decrees that if his words are true, then as of 1st January, 2003, Molero was no longer "Birching." This conflicts with the statement he made on the Freedom Underground forum. The screenshot above was taken from this page. If you scroll to the final paragraph of Molero's article, you will see that he makes this statement:
"At the time, NOLAJBS and other local Chapters of the John Birch Society, as well as non-members, were getting organized. However, this is no longer the case. As you may already know, we are no longer affiliated with the John Birch Society, but are continuing the work we started."
Molero states unequivocally that he is no longer associated with the John Birch Society. If Molero terminated his involvement with the JBS prior to January, 2003, then why does he claim that he resigned in July, 2004? Which of these two versions is true? Indeed, are either of them true? Perhaps Joe Molero is still actively involved with this Zionist front-group. It may well be the case that he never left and is attempting to deceive us into believing that he has.
Joe Molero needs to make a statement clarifying his position. He needs to explain why he has made two completely contradictory statements regarding the circumstances of his supposed departure from the John Birch Society.
While there are question marks surrounding Molero's involvement with the John Birch Society, there is no vagueness regarding his involvement with Alex Jones and Paul Joseph Watson. Molero would have us believe that he left the JBS because after "many years" of "suspecting" that the JBS are a Zionist front-group, he finally sussed that they actually are a Zionist front. Yet despite his 'awakening', to the Zionist conspiracy, Molero promoted the websites of two proven Zionist-deniers. Molero not only promoted Jones and Watson - he worked with them.
Molero tells us that he has "been working with two other guys on the running the forum", and that Paul Joseph Watson invited him to "help us out with this Yahoo group." This is a most interesting revelation indeed, because it confirms that Molero and Watson were acquainted as far back as 2003. As it is highly improbable that Watson would have trusted Molero to assist in the administration of the Prison Planet forum unless he knew him reasonably well, we can therefore safely assume that Joseph Anthony Molero and Paul Joseph Watson are more than mere acquaintances.
Less than a year ago, Alex Jones interviewed the President of the John Birch Society, John McManus. During the interview, Jones tells McManus of how he, "wants to work with you guys, to see you grow," to which McManus replies, "I am looking forward to seeing the relationship continue". What 'relationship' might that be then? Why would Jones want to work with a Zionist front-group unless he himself was a Zionist sympathiser? Think about it! Alex Jones has been promoting the JBS rather heavily lately, as the links here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here and here adequately demonstrate.
Joe Molero, a man who was involved with a Zionist front-group for "many years", a man who just a few years ago was running a proven Zionist stooge's forum, a man who may well still be involved with the John Birch Society, then has the chuptzah to infer that I am a crypto-Jew. I'm sure you will agree, dear reader, that Molero's credentials in this department are far stronger than mine. Having thoroughly researched my own family history, I can assure you that there is no Jewish blood flowing in my veins. I am of Scottish-Irish descent thus 100% Celtic, and unlike Molero, I have never been involved with Zionist front organisations or worked with Zionist stooges.
Molero would have us believe that he got wise to the Zionist deception within the JBS and left as a consequence but he seems not to have learned much about Zionist deception since his great awakening. Molero is either in a continued state of slumber or he is lying. Take your pick.
NOLAJBS links to Patriot Saints - a website that promotes Laws of Zion - a website that is affiliated with Remnant Saints - an organisation of which Alex Jones is a registered member. (See: RSICC - A John Birch-Society smokescreen-frontgroup/cell?)
Apart from promoting Alex Jones, Patriot Saints is a website that promotes...
...Truthseeker TV - producers of The Brandon Corey Story - a movie whose central theme is that Dick Cheney is a blood-drinking, shape-shifting lizard.
...Mike Ruppert - someone who Smith and Hufschmid feel should be decapitated.
...Jim Hoffman.
...Gerard Holmgren.
...The Emperor’s New Clothes - a website run by a man by the name of Jared Israel.
This link leads to Reverse Propagandists which is NOLAJBS' official blog. Click on links in the top-right corner, and then click on the September 11th link. Click the 911 Conspiracy, Sinister Plot link to view the Patriot Saints website, click France, Russia, Germany Responsible for 9-11? to be taken to the website of agent of disinformation, Joe Vialls - someone whom the Skunk suggests may be the psuedonym of Ari Ben-Menashe, an author and alleged Israeli Spy.
Click High Level of US Complicity to be taken to Gerard Holmgren's website, click Cover-up Two-Page Summary to be redirected to Paul Thompson - a man whose 9-11 timeline implies that Al-Qaeda were responsible for 9-11, a man who I Am The Witness have under suspicion as being involved in a cover-up of 9-11 rather than an expose - a man who Hufschmid says should be investigated for his involvement in the deceptive 9-11 Press For Truth video, and click on For Those Who Care About Our Future to be redirected to a website called Want To Know.
According to Want To Know, the "best" free videos providing 9/11 information, are the three that they list:
David Ray Griffin on C-SPAN 2
9/11: Press for Truth
Loose Change
And what do the external 9-11 websites that NOLAJBS link to all have in common? The answer is that none of them touch upon Israeli involvement in 9-11. How can it be that NOLAJBS purports itself as 'anti-Zionist' yet links to websites who shift the blame for 9-11 away from Zionists? Does this make any sense to you? Ask yourself why a supposed 'anti-Zionist' forum is promoting 9-11 websites that protect Zionists. Go figure.
Joe Molero would like us to believe that he is an 'anti-Zionist' but the external websites that his website links to indicate otherwise. Couple this with his involvement in known Zionist-controlled organisations, and you begin to get the picture. Joe Molero is no 'anti-Zionist.' But don't take my word for it, go and see for yourself.
If you scroll down until you reach the tenth listing, you will be viewing what appears in the screenshot below:
You can see that First Plumbline name Joe Molero in their 'credits' section but do not state what he is being credited with - devoted service to Zionism above and beyond the call of duty, I would expect. Rather amusingly, Molero's buddies at First Plumbline list him as being the ex-leader of a New Orleans cult. After you've wiped the tears of laughter from your eyes, take a look at the screenshot below. The text that is highlighted in green confirms that Molero must be aware of his listing on First Plumbline - he links to them. Of significant interest, is that First Plumbline is listed as a member site. This means that the owner of First Plumbline must also be a member of the NOLAJBS forum.
What a con. An 'anti-Zionist' forum that promotes a Christian Zionist website who believe in the God of Israel as the one true God.
The screenshot above was taken on 15th March but the 'Member Sites' section has now been removed from the homepage of the NOLAJBS forum. Someone has something to hide, don't they Joseph? Someone doesn't want you to see something, eh Mr. Molero? Ladies and gentleman, I have great pleasure in introducing Moriel.
If the evidence that I have presented so far hasn't raised any red-flags or set alarm bells ringing, then the penny should finally drop after taking a cursory glance at who Moriel link to. Hell-o-o. How much more obvious could it be? Unfortunately for Joe 'anti-Zionist' Molero, he is trapped by the link to First Plumbline via NOLAJBS. He cannot plead ignorance. It will be very interesting indeed to see how the duplicitous, lying toad tries to wriggle out of this one. You're nicked sunshine. Collared.
Joe Molero needs to make a statement - and quickly - explaining why, as an 'anti-Zionist', operating an 'anti-Zionist' forum, he is credited by, and promotes on NOLAJBS, a website that in turn promotes another website whose owner, James Jacob Prasch, is a Messianic Jew who demands the hermeneutic models of second temple period Judaism be the basis of biblical interpretation. Joe Molero claims to be a Christian. Christian Zionist would be a more apt description, I reckon.
Wild imaginations, Mr. Molero? I think not. Fugazi and I were right about you all along. It is YOU who is the fabricator. J'accuse.
Either how canst thou say to thy brother, Brother, let me pull out the mote that is in thine eye, when thou thyself beholdest not the beam that is in thine own eye? Thou hypocrite, cast out first the beam out of thine own eye, and then shalt thou see clearly to pull out the mote that is in thy brother's eye." Luke 6:42.
